Methodological Challenges in Sustainability Science: A Call for Method Plurality, Procedural Rigor and Longitudinal Research

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Methodological Challenges in Sustainability Science: A Call for Method Plurality, Procedural Rigor and Longitudinal Research. / Wehrden, Henrik; Lüderitz, Christopher; Leventon, Julia et al.

in: Challenges in Sustainability, Jahrgang 5, Nr. 1, 20.03.2017, S. 35-42.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{05049b72d9904f2b9ff7ef40b128f53e,
title = "Methodological Challenges in Sustainability Science: A Call for Method Plurality, Procedural Rigor and Longitudinal Research",
abstract = "Sustainability science encompasses a unique field that is defined through its purpose, the problem it addresses, and its solution-oriented agenda. However, this orientation creates significant methodological challenges. In this discussion paper, we conceptualize sustainability problems as wicked problems to tease out the key challenges that sustainability science is facing if scientists intend to deliver on its solution-oriented agenda. Building on the available literature, we discuss three aspects that demand increased attention for advancing sustainability science: 1) methods with higher diversity and complemen-tarity are needed to increase the chance of deriving solutions to the unique aspects of wicked problems; for instance, mixed methods approaches are potentially better suited to allow for an approximation of solutions,since they cover wider arrays of knowledge; 2) methodologies capable of dealing with wicked problems demand strict procedural and ethical guidelines, in order to ensure their integration potential; for example, learning from solution implementation in different contexts requires increased comparability between research approaches while carefully addressing issues of legitimacy and credibility; and 3) approaches areneeded that allow for longitudinal research, since wicked problems are continuous and solutions can only be diagnosed in retrospect; for example, complex dynamics of wicked problems play out across temporal patterns that are not necessarily aligned with the common timeframe of participatory sustainability research. Taken together, we call for plurality in methodologies, emphasizing procedural rigor and the necessity ofcontinuous research to effectively addressing wicked problems as well as methodological challenges in sustainability science ",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, mixed methods, solution-orientated, transdisciplinarity, wicked problems, Transdisciplinary studies",
author = "Henrik Wehrden and Christopher L{\"u}deritz and Julia Leventon and Sally Russell",
year = "2017",
month = mar,
day = "20",
doi = "10.12924/cis2017.05010035",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "35--42",
journal = "Challenges in Sustainability",
issn = "2297-6477",
publisher = "Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological Challenges in Sustainability Science: A Call for Method Plurality, Procedural Rigor and Longitudinal Research

AU - Wehrden, Henrik

AU - Lüderitz, Christopher

AU - Leventon, Julia

AU - Russell, Sally

PY - 2017/3/20

Y1 - 2017/3/20

N2 - Sustainability science encompasses a unique field that is defined through its purpose, the problem it addresses, and its solution-oriented agenda. However, this orientation creates significant methodological challenges. In this discussion paper, we conceptualize sustainability problems as wicked problems to tease out the key challenges that sustainability science is facing if scientists intend to deliver on its solution-oriented agenda. Building on the available literature, we discuss three aspects that demand increased attention for advancing sustainability science: 1) methods with higher diversity and complemen-tarity are needed to increase the chance of deriving solutions to the unique aspects of wicked problems; for instance, mixed methods approaches are potentially better suited to allow for an approximation of solutions,since they cover wider arrays of knowledge; 2) methodologies capable of dealing with wicked problems demand strict procedural and ethical guidelines, in order to ensure their integration potential; for example, learning from solution implementation in different contexts requires increased comparability between research approaches while carefully addressing issues of legitimacy and credibility; and 3) approaches areneeded that allow for longitudinal research, since wicked problems are continuous and solutions can only be diagnosed in retrospect; for example, complex dynamics of wicked problems play out across temporal patterns that are not necessarily aligned with the common timeframe of participatory sustainability research. Taken together, we call for plurality in methodologies, emphasizing procedural rigor and the necessity ofcontinuous research to effectively addressing wicked problems as well as methodological challenges in sustainability science

AB - Sustainability science encompasses a unique field that is defined through its purpose, the problem it addresses, and its solution-oriented agenda. However, this orientation creates significant methodological challenges. In this discussion paper, we conceptualize sustainability problems as wicked problems to tease out the key challenges that sustainability science is facing if scientists intend to deliver on its solution-oriented agenda. Building on the available literature, we discuss three aspects that demand increased attention for advancing sustainability science: 1) methods with higher diversity and complemen-tarity are needed to increase the chance of deriving solutions to the unique aspects of wicked problems; for instance, mixed methods approaches are potentially better suited to allow for an approximation of solutions,since they cover wider arrays of knowledge; 2) methodologies capable of dealing with wicked problems demand strict procedural and ethical guidelines, in order to ensure their integration potential; for example, learning from solution implementation in different contexts requires increased comparability between research approaches while carefully addressing issues of legitimacy and credibility; and 3) approaches areneeded that allow for longitudinal research, since wicked problems are continuous and solutions can only be diagnosed in retrospect; for example, complex dynamics of wicked problems play out across temporal patterns that are not necessarily aligned with the common timeframe of participatory sustainability research. Taken together, we call for plurality in methodologies, emphasizing procedural rigor and the necessity ofcontinuous research to effectively addressing wicked problems as well as methodological challenges in sustainability science

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - mixed methods

KW - solution-orientated

KW - transdisciplinarity

KW - wicked problems

KW - Transdisciplinary studies

U2 - 10.12924/cis2017.05010035

DO - 10.12924/cis2017.05010035

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 5

SP - 35

EP - 42

JO - Challenges in Sustainability

JF - Challenges in Sustainability

SN - 2297-6477

IS - 1

ER -

Dokumente

DOI