Measuring cognitive load with subjective rating scales during problem solving: differences between immediate and delayed ratings
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Instructional Science, Jahrgang 43, Nr. 1, 01.01.2015, S. 93-114.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring cognitive load with subjective rating scales during problem solving
T2 - differences between immediate and delayed ratings
AU - Schmeck, Annett
AU - Opfermann, Maria
AU - van Gog, Tamara
AU - Paas, Fred
AU - Leutner, Detlev
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - Subjective cognitive load (CL) rating scales are widely used in educational research. However, there are still some open questions regarding the point of time at which such scales should be applied. Whereas some studies apply rating scales directly after each step or task and use an average of these ratings, others assess CL only once after the whole learning or problem-solving phase. To investigate if these two approaches are comparable indicators of experienced CL, two experiments were conducted, in which 168 and 107 teacher education university students, respectively, worked through a sequence of six problems. CL was assessed by means of subjective ratings of mental effort and perceived task difficulty after each problem and after the whole process. Results showed that the delayed ratings of both effort and difficulty were significantly higher than the average of the six ratings made during problem solving. In addition, the problems we assumed to be of higher complexity seemed to be the best predictors for the delayed ratings. Interestingly, for ratings of affective variables, such as interest and motivation, the delayed rating did not differ from the average of immediate ratings.
AB - Subjective cognitive load (CL) rating scales are widely used in educational research. However, there are still some open questions regarding the point of time at which such scales should be applied. Whereas some studies apply rating scales directly after each step or task and use an average of these ratings, others assess CL only once after the whole learning or problem-solving phase. To investigate if these two approaches are comparable indicators of experienced CL, two experiments were conducted, in which 168 and 107 teacher education university students, respectively, worked through a sequence of six problems. CL was assessed by means of subjective ratings of mental effort and perceived task difficulty after each problem and after the whole process. Results showed that the delayed ratings of both effort and difficulty were significantly higher than the average of the six ratings made during problem solving. In addition, the problems we assumed to be of higher complexity seemed to be the best predictors for the delayed ratings. Interestingly, for ratings of affective variables, such as interest and motivation, the delayed rating did not differ from the average of immediate ratings.
KW - Cognitive load
KW - Measurement
KW - Mental effort
KW - Problem solving
KW - Task difficulty
KW - Psychology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027940284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11251-014-9328-3
DO - 10.1007/s11251-014-9328-3
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85027940284
VL - 43
SP - 93
EP - 114
JO - Instructional Science
JF - Instructional Science
SN - 0020-4277
IS - 1
ER -