Mass-Mediated Expertise as Informal Policy Advice
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Science, Technology and Human Values, Jahrgang 35, Nr. 6, 01.11.2010, S. 865-887.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Mass-Mediated Expertise as Informal Policy Advice
AU - Petersen, Imme
AU - Heinrichs, Harald
AU - Peters, Hans Peter
N1 - Special Issue: Scientific expertise between uncertainty and ambiguity
PY - 2010/11/1
Y1 - 2010/11/1
N2 - Scientific policy advice is usually perceived as a formalized advisory process within political institutions. Politics has benefited from this arrangement because the science-based rationalization of policy has contributed to its legitimacy. However, in Western democratic societies, scientific expertise that is routinely mobilized to legitimate political positions has increasingly lost its power due to controversial expertise in the public sphere in particular within the mass media. As a consequence of the medialization of science, political decision makers are increasingly confronted with mass-mediated expertise. Empirical results of a qualitative survey among decision makers in the German political and administrative system, presented in this article, support the hypothesis that mass-mediated expertise has a significant impact on policy processes. Five functions of media coverage on science-based issues for policy making were identified. Mass-mediated expertise has therefore altered the established relations between scientific policy advisors and political decision makers and can be seen as informal policy advice complementing institutionalized advisory arrangements.
AB - Scientific policy advice is usually perceived as a formalized advisory process within political institutions. Politics has benefited from this arrangement because the science-based rationalization of policy has contributed to its legitimacy. However, in Western democratic societies, scientific expertise that is routinely mobilized to legitimate political positions has increasingly lost its power due to controversial expertise in the public sphere in particular within the mass media. As a consequence of the medialization of science, political decision makers are increasingly confronted with mass-mediated expertise. Empirical results of a qualitative survey among decision makers in the German political and administrative system, presented in this article, support the hypothesis that mass-mediated expertise has a significant impact on policy processes. Five functions of media coverage on science-based issues for policy making were identified. Mass-mediated expertise has therefore altered the established relations between scientific policy advisors and political decision makers and can be seen as informal policy advice complementing institutionalized advisory arrangements.
KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication
KW - scientific expertise
KW - medialization
KW - political mass media effects
KW - policy advice
KW - mass media
KW - mass media
KW - medialization
KW - policy advice
KW - political mass media effects
KW - scientific expertise
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77957282673&origin=inward&txGid=0
U2 - 10.1177/0162243909357914
DO - 10.1177/0162243909357914
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 35
SP - 865
EP - 887
JO - Science, Technology and Human Values
JF - Science, Technology and Human Values
SN - 0162-2439
IS - 6
ER -