Managing technology as a virtual enterprise

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Managing technology as a virtual enterprise. / Weisenfeld, Ursula; Fisscher, Olaf; Pearson, Alan et al.
in: R&D Management, Jahrgang 31, Nr. 3, 01.07.2001, S. 323-334.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Weisenfeld, U, Fisscher, O, Pearson, A & Brockhoff, K 2001, 'Managing technology as a virtual enterprise', R&D Management, Jg. 31, Nr. 3, S. 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00220

APA

Vancouver

Weisenfeld U, Fisscher O, Pearson A, Brockhoff K. Managing technology as a virtual enterprise. R&D Management. 2001 Jul 1;31(3):323-334. doi: 10.1111/1467-9310.00220

Bibtex

@article{11798c9b04fb4a0cb63b20d28c98496c,
title = "Managing technology as a virtual enterprise",
abstract = "The complexity of R&D projects and growing international competition are factors leading to more cooperation especially among small and medium-sized firms. But even large integrated firms are often not willing or able to perform the necessary amount of R&D and to cope with the uncertainty associated with radical innovations. In a virtual company, members form a network, thereby enabling projects to be pursued by combining member's resources. Specific assets of a virtual company are its flexibility and ability to handle variety. Costs of co-ordination and motivation are lowered if the virtual company succeeds in building trust and commitment. On the other hand, lack of these pose severe problems. In markets with a strong scientific-technological basis and rapid rate of change the concept of a virtual organization seems appealing. High R&D costs and risks can be shared, developments and time-to-market can be accelerated and the partners can concentrate on their respective core competencies. In the paper we use an example from the biotechnology industry as a case study and discuss some of the theoretical and practical problems that are encountered in the virtual enterprise.",
keywords = "Management studies",
author = "Ursula Weisenfeld and Olaf Fisscher and Alan Pearson and Klaus Brockhoff",
year = "2001",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1467-9310.00220",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "323--334",
journal = "R&D Management",
issn = "0033-6807",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing technology as a virtual enterprise

AU - Weisenfeld, Ursula

AU - Fisscher, Olaf

AU - Pearson, Alan

AU - Brockhoff, Klaus

PY - 2001/7/1

Y1 - 2001/7/1

N2 - The complexity of R&D projects and growing international competition are factors leading to more cooperation especially among small and medium-sized firms. But even large integrated firms are often not willing or able to perform the necessary amount of R&D and to cope with the uncertainty associated with radical innovations. In a virtual company, members form a network, thereby enabling projects to be pursued by combining member's resources. Specific assets of a virtual company are its flexibility and ability to handle variety. Costs of co-ordination and motivation are lowered if the virtual company succeeds in building trust and commitment. On the other hand, lack of these pose severe problems. In markets with a strong scientific-technological basis and rapid rate of change the concept of a virtual organization seems appealing. High R&D costs and risks can be shared, developments and time-to-market can be accelerated and the partners can concentrate on their respective core competencies. In the paper we use an example from the biotechnology industry as a case study and discuss some of the theoretical and practical problems that are encountered in the virtual enterprise.

AB - The complexity of R&D projects and growing international competition are factors leading to more cooperation especially among small and medium-sized firms. But even large integrated firms are often not willing or able to perform the necessary amount of R&D and to cope with the uncertainty associated with radical innovations. In a virtual company, members form a network, thereby enabling projects to be pursued by combining member's resources. Specific assets of a virtual company are its flexibility and ability to handle variety. Costs of co-ordination and motivation are lowered if the virtual company succeeds in building trust and commitment. On the other hand, lack of these pose severe problems. In markets with a strong scientific-technological basis and rapid rate of change the concept of a virtual organization seems appealing. High R&D costs and risks can be shared, developments and time-to-market can be accelerated and the partners can concentrate on their respective core competencies. In the paper we use an example from the biotechnology industry as a case study and discuss some of the theoretical and practical problems that are encountered in the virtual enterprise.

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035596086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9310.00220

DO - 10.1111/1467-9310.00220

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 31

SP - 323

EP - 334

JO - R&D Management

JF - R&D Management

SN - 0033-6807

IS - 3

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Incentives under hybrid activity-based costing systems
  2. The complementarity of single-species and ecosystem-oriented research in conservation research
  3. Effects of grade retention on achievement and self-concept in science and mathematics
  4. Political Representation in the EU
  5. Umweltrechtsschutz in China
  6. Multimodality in Strategy-as-Practice Research
  7. Dynamicland
  8. ORCHIDEE-SOM
  9. Motivation revisited
  10. What do we do with "other" music?
  11. From Making to Displaying: The Role of Organizational Space in Showing Creative Coolness at the Volkshotel
  12. The Role of Assessment and Quality Management in Transformations towards Sustainable Development
  13. Consequence evaluations and moral concerns about climate change
  14. A Glue from Snail Slime?!
  15. Corporate hedging for different production cycles with the wavelet-approach
  16. Explaining primary school teachers’ intention to use digital learning platforms for students’ individualized practice
  17. Effects of facebook activities on the performance of start-ups
  18. Valuing beaches for beauty and recreation only? Uncovering perception bias through a hashtag analysis
  19. The magnitude of correlation between deadlift 1RM and jumping performance is sports dependent
  20. From incremental to fundamental substitution in chemical alternatives assessment
  21. Does outcome expectancy predict outcomes in online depression prevention? Secondary analysis of randomised-controlled trials
  22. Who guards the guards with AI-driven robots? The ethicalness and cognitive neutralization of police violence following AI-robot advice
  23. Atmospheric mercury speciation and mercury in snow over time at Alert, Canada
  24. Kinder als Manager
  25. Teaching entrepreneurship as lived experience through ‘wonderment exercises’