Managing Multiple Logics: The Role of Performance Measurement Systems in Social Enterprises

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

Managing Multiple Logics: The Role of Performance Measurement Systems in Social Enterprises. / Nielsen, Janni Grouleff; Lueg, Rainer; van Liempd, Dennis.

in: Sustainability, Jahrgang 11, Nr. 8, 2327, 18.04.2019.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Nielsen JG, Lueg R, van Liempd D. Managing Multiple Logics: The Role of Performance Measurement Systems in Social Enterprises. Sustainability. 2019 Apr 18;11(8):2327. doi: 10.3390/su11082327

Bibtex

@article{959327e8ae384c3b92b1d73b91b1bcae,
title = "Managing Multiple Logics: The Role of Performance Measurement Systems in Social Enterprises",
abstract = "This systematic literature review explores the role of performance measurement systems (PMSs) in managing multiple logics in social enterprises. Social enterprises are hybrid organizations that simultaneously pursue a social mission (social logic) and financial sustainability (commercial logic). Satisfying multiple logics often leads to tensions, which are addressed and managed through PMSs. For this, we conduct a systematic literature review to derive our conclusions. PMSs in social enterprises may assume the roles of mediator, disrupter and symbolizer. The PMS works as a mediator in combination with sincere stakeholder involvement when both logics are represented in the PMS. If a PMS represents only one logic, it increases tensions and the PMS becomes a disrupter. When the PMS is used to enhance legitimacy, the PMS assumes the role of a symbolizer. In particular, we find that PMSs are most useful for monitoring performance and enhancing legitimacy. The role of PMSs in decision-making is limited due to difficulties of integrating social and commercial logics into a single PMS. Several factors—such as decision-makers{\textquoteright} influence—further shape the role of PMSs",
keywords = "performance measurement, social enterprise, tensions, stakeholder involvement, Management studies",
author = "Nielsen, {Janni Grouleff} and Rainer Lueg and {van Liempd}, Dennis",
note = "Funding: J.G.N. Ph.d.project was funded by Innovationsfonden Denmark. The APC was funded by University of Southern Denmark. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 by the authors.",
year = "2019",
month = apr,
day = "18",
doi = "10.3390/su11082327",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing Multiple Logics: The Role of Performance Measurement Systems in Social Enterprises

AU - Nielsen, Janni Grouleff

AU - Lueg, Rainer

AU - van Liempd, Dennis

N1 - Funding: J.G.N. Ph.d.project was funded by Innovationsfonden Denmark. The APC was funded by University of Southern Denmark. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 by the authors.

PY - 2019/4/18

Y1 - 2019/4/18

N2 - This systematic literature review explores the role of performance measurement systems (PMSs) in managing multiple logics in social enterprises. Social enterprises are hybrid organizations that simultaneously pursue a social mission (social logic) and financial sustainability (commercial logic). Satisfying multiple logics often leads to tensions, which are addressed and managed through PMSs. For this, we conduct a systematic literature review to derive our conclusions. PMSs in social enterprises may assume the roles of mediator, disrupter and symbolizer. The PMS works as a mediator in combination with sincere stakeholder involvement when both logics are represented in the PMS. If a PMS represents only one logic, it increases tensions and the PMS becomes a disrupter. When the PMS is used to enhance legitimacy, the PMS assumes the role of a symbolizer. In particular, we find that PMSs are most useful for monitoring performance and enhancing legitimacy. The role of PMSs in decision-making is limited due to difficulties of integrating social and commercial logics into a single PMS. Several factors—such as decision-makers’ influence—further shape the role of PMSs

AB - This systematic literature review explores the role of performance measurement systems (PMSs) in managing multiple logics in social enterprises. Social enterprises are hybrid organizations that simultaneously pursue a social mission (social logic) and financial sustainability (commercial logic). Satisfying multiple logics often leads to tensions, which are addressed and managed through PMSs. For this, we conduct a systematic literature review to derive our conclusions. PMSs in social enterprises may assume the roles of mediator, disrupter and symbolizer. The PMS works as a mediator in combination with sincere stakeholder involvement when both logics are represented in the PMS. If a PMS represents only one logic, it increases tensions and the PMS becomes a disrupter. When the PMS is used to enhance legitimacy, the PMS assumes the role of a symbolizer. In particular, we find that PMSs are most useful for monitoring performance and enhancing legitimacy. The role of PMSs in decision-making is limited due to difficulties of integrating social and commercial logics into a single PMS. Several factors—such as decision-makers’ influence—further shape the role of PMSs

KW - performance measurement

KW - social enterprise

KW - tensions

KW - stakeholder involvement

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066939035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/04330425-087f-34e5-8e9e-a802a3cf1f34/

U2 - 10.3390/su11082327

DO - 10.3390/su11082327

M3 - Scientific review articles

VL - 11

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 8

M1 - 2327

ER -

Dokumente

DOI