Magnús eiríksson: An opponent of martensen and an unwelcome ally of kierkegaard
Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Kapitel › begutachtet
Standard
Magnús eiríksson : An opponent of martensen and an unwelcome ally of kierkegaard. / Schreiber, Gerhard.
Volume 7, Tome II: Kierkegaard and His Danish Contemporaries - Theology. Hrsg. / John Stewart. Band 7 Taylor and Francis Inc., 2009. S. 49-94.Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Kapitel › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Magnús eiríksson
T2 - An opponent of martensen and an unwelcome ally of kierkegaard
AU - Schreiber, Gerhard
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Jon stewart and The contributors 2009.
PY - 2009/11/28
Y1 - 2009/11/28
N2 - The secondary literature has long demanded a more detailed account, or a systematicTheological interpretation, of The complete works of The icelandic Theologian and religious author magnús eiríksson (1806-81). The limited scholarship that does exist on eiríksson1 and on kierkegaard’s relation to him2 is marred by generalizations and oversimplifications, particularly with regard to eiríksson’s Theological stance, which is commonly characterized as a form of “(neo-)rationalism.” If (kierkegaard) researchers continue to lack interest in eiríksson and in The kierkegaard-eiríksson encounter, this may perhaps be explained by The fact that kierkegaard fought his battles with his fellow copenhagener exclusively in his journals and papers. One result of this fact is that neiTher eiríksson’s name nor direct reference to any of his writings can be found in kierkegaard’s published works.3.
AB - The secondary literature has long demanded a more detailed account, or a systematicTheological interpretation, of The complete works of The icelandic Theologian and religious author magnús eiríksson (1806-81). The limited scholarship that does exist on eiríksson1 and on kierkegaard’s relation to him2 is marred by generalizations and oversimplifications, particularly with regard to eiríksson’s Theological stance, which is commonly characterized as a form of “(neo-)rationalism.” If (kierkegaard) researchers continue to lack interest in eiríksson and in The kierkegaard-eiríksson encounter, this may perhaps be explained by The fact that kierkegaard fought his battles with his fellow copenhagener exclusively in his journals and papers. One result of this fact is that neiTher eiríksson’s name nor direct reference to any of his writings can be found in kierkegaard’s published works.3.
KW - Theology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108485058&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4324/9781315234540-10
DO - 10.4324/9781315234540-10
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85108485058
SN - 9781351874373
SN - 9781138266032
VL - 7
SP - 49
EP - 94
BT - Volume 7, Tome II
A2 - Stewart, John
PB - Taylor and Francis Inc.
ER -