Mad speculation and absolute inhumanism: Lovecraft, ligotti, and the weirding of philosophy

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Mad speculation and absolute inhumanism: Lovecraft, ligotti, and the weirding of philosophy. / Woodard, Ben.
in: Logos, Jahrgang 29, Nr. 5, 01.01.2019, S. 203-228.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Woodard B. Mad speculation and absolute inhumanism: Lovecraft, ligotti, and the weirding of philosophy. Logos. 2019 Jan 1;29(5):203-228. doi: 10.22394/0869-5377-2019-5-203-225

Bibtex

@article{ab65792c00d8405c85bc6b5135b931db,
title = "Mad speculation and absolute inhumanism: Lovecraft, ligotti, and the weirding of philosophy",
abstract = "How does one redefine the boundary between madness and rationality? This is the question that launches Ben Woodard on a discussion of the methods for accessing the Absolute or what he refers to as the Great Outdoors. Immanuel Kant{\textquoteright}s theoretical framework with its “legalistic” norms is the first target of his criticism, which argues that Kant{\textquoteright}s bulwark shielding rationality from madness is untenable. Kant had “circled his wagons” against madness in order to clearly distinguish philosophical speculation from the ravings of a madman, but that defense deprived philosophy of the capacity to describe reality as it is. Speculative realism positions itself as an alternative to Kant that holds out the promise of access to the Great Outdoors; therefore it must somehow distinguish philosophy from madness. Rather than indulging in the “mad speculation” or theoretical permissiveness of some followers of Gilles Deleuze and F{\'e}lix Guattari in order to leave the narrow limits of reason behind, Woodard applies the thinking of Thomas Ligotti and Howard Lovecraft to make a two-pronged attack on anthropocentrism. Lovecraft represents a “shoggothic materialism” that energizes the horror of formless matter, while Ligotti represents a “ventriloquist idealism” highlighting the inherent horror of having a consciousness. Weird fiction then is no longer a literary excuse for madness that justifies pursuit of after stunning imagery at the expense of meaning, but is instead an important theoretical tool for grounding the external as such. What is ultimate is not attainable through altered states of consciousness or otherwise distorting language or bodily being. To the contrary, it is reached by rather tedious work with a text which is itself already positioned in the Outdoors with respect to the reader.",
keywords = "Absolute, F{\'e}lix Guattari, Gilles Deleuze, Howard Lovecraft, Inhumanism, Madness, Nick Land, Philosophy of horror, Rationality, Thomas Ligotti, Ventriloquist idealism, Weird fiction, Philosophy",
author = "Ben Woodard",
year = "2019",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.22394/0869-5377-2019-5-203-225",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "203--228",
journal = "Logos",
issn = "0869-5377",
publisher = "Institut Ekonomicheskoi Politiki im. E.T. & Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mad speculation and absolute inhumanism

T2 - Lovecraft, ligotti, and the weirding of philosophy

AU - Woodard, Ben

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - How does one redefine the boundary between madness and rationality? This is the question that launches Ben Woodard on a discussion of the methods for accessing the Absolute or what he refers to as the Great Outdoors. Immanuel Kant’s theoretical framework with its “legalistic” norms is the first target of his criticism, which argues that Kant’s bulwark shielding rationality from madness is untenable. Kant had “circled his wagons” against madness in order to clearly distinguish philosophical speculation from the ravings of a madman, but that defense deprived philosophy of the capacity to describe reality as it is. Speculative realism positions itself as an alternative to Kant that holds out the promise of access to the Great Outdoors; therefore it must somehow distinguish philosophy from madness. Rather than indulging in the “mad speculation” or theoretical permissiveness of some followers of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari in order to leave the narrow limits of reason behind, Woodard applies the thinking of Thomas Ligotti and Howard Lovecraft to make a two-pronged attack on anthropocentrism. Lovecraft represents a “shoggothic materialism” that energizes the horror of formless matter, while Ligotti represents a “ventriloquist idealism” highlighting the inherent horror of having a consciousness. Weird fiction then is no longer a literary excuse for madness that justifies pursuit of after stunning imagery at the expense of meaning, but is instead an important theoretical tool for grounding the external as such. What is ultimate is not attainable through altered states of consciousness or otherwise distorting language or bodily being. To the contrary, it is reached by rather tedious work with a text which is itself already positioned in the Outdoors with respect to the reader.

AB - How does one redefine the boundary between madness and rationality? This is the question that launches Ben Woodard on a discussion of the methods for accessing the Absolute or what he refers to as the Great Outdoors. Immanuel Kant’s theoretical framework with its “legalistic” norms is the first target of his criticism, which argues that Kant’s bulwark shielding rationality from madness is untenable. Kant had “circled his wagons” against madness in order to clearly distinguish philosophical speculation from the ravings of a madman, but that defense deprived philosophy of the capacity to describe reality as it is. Speculative realism positions itself as an alternative to Kant that holds out the promise of access to the Great Outdoors; therefore it must somehow distinguish philosophy from madness. Rather than indulging in the “mad speculation” or theoretical permissiveness of some followers of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari in order to leave the narrow limits of reason behind, Woodard applies the thinking of Thomas Ligotti and Howard Lovecraft to make a two-pronged attack on anthropocentrism. Lovecraft represents a “shoggothic materialism” that energizes the horror of formless matter, while Ligotti represents a “ventriloquist idealism” highlighting the inherent horror of having a consciousness. Weird fiction then is no longer a literary excuse for madness that justifies pursuit of after stunning imagery at the expense of meaning, but is instead an important theoretical tool for grounding the external as such. What is ultimate is not attainable through altered states of consciousness or otherwise distorting language or bodily being. To the contrary, it is reached by rather tedious work with a text which is itself already positioned in the Outdoors with respect to the reader.

KW - Absolute

KW - Félix Guattari

KW - Gilles Deleuze

KW - Howard Lovecraft

KW - Inhumanism

KW - Madness

KW - Nick Land

KW - Philosophy of horror

KW - Rationality

KW - Thomas Ligotti

KW - Ventriloquist idealism

KW - Weird fiction

KW - Philosophy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075598317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.22394/0869-5377-2019-5-203-225

DO - 10.22394/0869-5377-2019-5-203-225

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85075598317

VL - 29

SP - 203

EP - 228

JO - Logos

JF - Logos

SN - 0869-5377

IS - 5

ER -

DOI