Lives versus Livelihoods? Perceived economic risk has a stronger association with support for COVID-19 preventive measures than perceived health risk
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
Lives versus Livelihoods? Perceived economic risk has a stronger association with support for COVID-19 preventive measures than perceived health risk. / Nisa, Claudia F.; Bélanger, Jocelyn J.; Faller, Daiane G. et al.
in: Scientific Reports, Jahrgang 11, Nr. 1, 9669, 2021.Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Lives versus Livelihoods? Perceived economic risk has a stronger association with support for COVID-19 preventive measures than perceived health risk
AU - Nisa, Claudia F.
AU - Bélanger, Jocelyn J.
AU - Faller, Daiane G.
AU - Buttrick, Nicholas R.
AU - Mierau, Jochen O.
AU - Austin, Maura M.K.
AU - Schumpe, Birga M.
AU - Sasin, Edyta M.
AU - Agostini, Maximilian
AU - Gützkow, Ben
AU - Kreienkamp, Jannis
AU - Abakoumkin, Georgios
AU - Abdul Khaiyom, Jamilah Hanum
AU - Ahmedi, Vjollca
AU - Akkas, Handan
AU - Almenara, Carlos A.
AU - Atta, Mohsin
AU - Bagci, Sabahat Cigdem
AU - Basel, Sima
AU - Kida, Edona Berisha
AU - Bernardo, Allan B.I.
AU - Chobthamkit, Phatthanakit
AU - Choi, Hoon Seok
AU - Cristea, Mioara
AU - Csaba, Sára
AU - Damnjanović, Kaja
AU - Danyliuk, Ivan
AU - Dash, Arobindu
AU - Di Santo, Daniela
AU - Douglas, Karen M.
AU - Enea, Violeta
AU - Fitzsimons, Gavan
AU - Gheorghiu, Alexandra
AU - Gómez, Ángel
AU - Grzymala-Moszczynska, Joanna
AU - Hamaidia, Ali
AU - Han, Qing
AU - Helmy, Mai
AU - Hudiyana, Joevarian
AU - Jeronimus, Bertus F.
AU - Jiang, Ding Yu
AU - Jovanović, Veljko
AU - Kamenov, Željka
AU - Kende, Anna
AU - Keng, Shian Ling
AU - Kieu, Tra Thi Thanh
AU - Koc, Yasin
AU - Kovyazina, Kamila
AU - Kozytska, Inna
AU - Krause, Joshua
AU - Kruglanski, Arie W.
AU - Kurapov, Anton
AU - Kutlaca, Maja
AU - Lantos, Nóra Anna
AU - Lemay, Edward P.
AU - Lesmana, Cokorda Bagus Jaya
AU - Louis, Winnifred R.
AU - Lueders, Adrian
AU - Malik, Najma Iqbal
AU - Martinez, Anton
AU - McCabe, Kira O.
AU - Mehulić, Jasmina
AU - Milla, Mirra Noor
AU - Mohammed, Idris
AU - Molinario, Erica
AU - Moyano, Manuel
AU - Muhammad, Hayat
AU - Mula, Silvana
AU - Muluk, Hamdi
AU - Myroniuk, Solomiia
AU - Najafi, Reza
AU - Nyúl, Boglárka
AU - O’Keefe, Paul A.
AU - Osuna, Jose Javier Olivas
AU - Osin, Evgeny N.
AU - Park, Joonha
AU - Pica, Gennaro
AU - Pierro, Antonio
AU - Rees, Jonas
AU - Reitsema, Anne Margit
AU - Resta, Elena
AU - Rullo, Marika
AU - Ryan, Michelle K.
AU - Samekin, Adil
AU - Santtila, Pekka
AU - Selim, Heyla A.
AU - Stanton, Michael Vicente
AU - Sultana, Samiah
AU - Sutton, Robbie M.
AU - Tseliou, Eleftheria
AU - Utsugi, Akira
AU - van Breen, Jolien Anne
AU - Van Lissa, Caspar J.
AU - Van Veen, Kees
AU - vanDellen, Michelle R.
AU - Vázquez, Alexandra
AU - Wollast, Robin
AU - Yeung, Victoria Wai lan
AU - Zand, Somayeh
AU - Žeželj, Iris Lav
AU - Zheng, Bang
AU - Zick, Andreas
AU - Zúñiga, Claudia
AU - Leander, N. Pontus
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - This paper examines whether compliance with COVID-19 mitigation measures is motivated by wanting to save lives or save the economy (or both), and which implications this carries to fight the pandemic. National representative samples were collected from 24 countries (N = 25,435). The main predictors were (1) perceived risk to contract coronavirus, (2) perceived risk to suffer economic losses due to coronavirus, and (3) their interaction effect. Individual and country-level variables were added as covariates in multilevel regression models. We examined compliance with various preventive health behaviors and support for strict containment policies. Results show that perceived economic risk consistently predicted mitigation behavior and policy support—and its effects were positive. Perceived health risk had mixed effects. Only two significant interactions between health and economic risk were identified—both positive.
AB - This paper examines whether compliance with COVID-19 mitigation measures is motivated by wanting to save lives or save the economy (or both), and which implications this carries to fight the pandemic. National representative samples were collected from 24 countries (N = 25,435). The main predictors were (1) perceived risk to contract coronavirus, (2) perceived risk to suffer economic losses due to coronavirus, and (3) their interaction effect. Individual and country-level variables were added as covariates in multilevel regression models. We examined compliance with various preventive health behaviors and support for strict containment policies. Results show that perceived economic risk consistently predicted mitigation behavior and policy support—and its effects were positive. Perceived health risk had mixed effects. Only two significant interactions between health and economic risk were identified—both positive.
KW - Psychology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105459494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-021-88314-4
DO - 10.1038/s41598-021-88314-4
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 33958617
AN - SCOPUS:85105459494
VL - 11
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
SN - 2045-2322
IS - 1
M1 - 9669
ER -