Life Satisfaction During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Human, Economic, Social, and Psychological Capital

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Life Satisfaction During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Human, Economic, Social, and Psychological Capital. / Delhey, Jan; Hess, Stephanie; Boehnke, Klaus et al.
in: Journal of Happiness Studies, Jahrgang 24, Nr. 7, 10.2023, S. 2201-2222.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Delhey J, Hess S, Boehnke K, Deutsch F, Eichhorn J, Kühnen U et al. Life Satisfaction During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Human, Economic, Social, and Psychological Capital. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2023 Okt;24(7):2201-2222. doi: 10.1007/s10902-023-00676-w

Bibtex

@article{a1491ac09d32457381753500b230ab94,
title = "Life Satisfaction During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Human, Economic, Social, and Psychological Capital",
abstract = "A cornerstone of well-being research is that the resource-rich are happier with their lives than the resource-poor and better positioned to cope with stressful life events. This paper addresses the role of various resources—human, economic, social, and psychological capital—in life satisfaction during the coronavirus pandemic, using panel data from Germany and the United Kingdom for 2020 and 2021. Cross-sectionally, we find life satisfaction to be clearly related to all these forms of capital, with psychological capital being the strongest predictor of life satisfaction. Longitudinally, the capital endowments in 2020 did not predict changes in life satisfaction within individuals from 2020 to 2021, except for psychological capital. Our results suggest two things: first, the unfolding pandemic did not heighten well-being inequalities; and second, weathering the pandemic required psychological resources in the first place.",
keywords = "COVID-19, Economic capital, Life satisfaction, Psychological capital, Social capital, Well-being inequality, Politics",
author = "Jan Delhey and Stephanie Hess and Klaus Boehnke and Franziska Deutsch and Jan Eichhorn and Ulrich K{\"u}hnen and Christian Welzel",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023, The Author(s).",
year = "2023",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1007/s10902-023-00676-w",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "2201--2222",
journal = "Journal of Happiness Studies",
issn = "1389-4978",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Life Satisfaction During the COVID-19 Pandemic

T2 - The Role of Human, Economic, Social, and Psychological Capital

AU - Delhey, Jan

AU - Hess, Stephanie

AU - Boehnke, Klaus

AU - Deutsch, Franziska

AU - Eichhorn, Jan

AU - Kühnen, Ulrich

AU - Welzel, Christian

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).

PY - 2023/10

Y1 - 2023/10

N2 - A cornerstone of well-being research is that the resource-rich are happier with their lives than the resource-poor and better positioned to cope with stressful life events. This paper addresses the role of various resources—human, economic, social, and psychological capital—in life satisfaction during the coronavirus pandemic, using panel data from Germany and the United Kingdom for 2020 and 2021. Cross-sectionally, we find life satisfaction to be clearly related to all these forms of capital, with psychological capital being the strongest predictor of life satisfaction. Longitudinally, the capital endowments in 2020 did not predict changes in life satisfaction within individuals from 2020 to 2021, except for psychological capital. Our results suggest two things: first, the unfolding pandemic did not heighten well-being inequalities; and second, weathering the pandemic required psychological resources in the first place.

AB - A cornerstone of well-being research is that the resource-rich are happier with their lives than the resource-poor and better positioned to cope with stressful life events. This paper addresses the role of various resources—human, economic, social, and psychological capital—in life satisfaction during the coronavirus pandemic, using panel data from Germany and the United Kingdom for 2020 and 2021. Cross-sectionally, we find life satisfaction to be clearly related to all these forms of capital, with psychological capital being the strongest predictor of life satisfaction. Longitudinally, the capital endowments in 2020 did not predict changes in life satisfaction within individuals from 2020 to 2021, except for psychological capital. Our results suggest two things: first, the unfolding pandemic did not heighten well-being inequalities; and second, weathering the pandemic required psychological resources in the first place.

KW - COVID-19

KW - Economic capital

KW - Life satisfaction

KW - Psychological capital

KW - Social capital

KW - Well-being inequality

KW - Politics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165070992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5e9afbe8-8a85-370f-aa59-923e4ab141af/

U2 - 10.1007/s10902-023-00676-w

DO - 10.1007/s10902-023-00676-w

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85165070992

VL - 24

SP - 2201

EP - 2222

JO - Journal of Happiness Studies

JF - Journal of Happiness Studies

SN - 1389-4978

IS - 7

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Aby Warburg’s literal and intermedial self-translation
  2. Bilderwanderungen. Umberto Boccionis memorialer Atlas
  3. Social–ecological inventory in a postdisaster context
  4. Measuring institutional overlap in global governance
  5. Information and the evolution of human communication
  6. Russian maritime strategy since the Ukrainian crisis
  7. The development of an eco-label for software products
  8. Liberalism, postmaterialism, and the growth of freedom
  9. Social movements in defense of public water services
  10. Sind wir mit der ‚fraternisierenden Solidarität‘ fertig?
  11. Rebound Effects in Methods of Artificial Intelligence
  12. Erzählungen in Literatur und Medien und ihre Didaktik
  13. Guided online treatment in routine mental health care
  14. Heaven and Earth – Cloud and Territory in the Internet
  15. Textsortenspezifische sprachliche Variation ermitteln
  16. Beschwerde, Ombudschaft und die Kinder- und Jugendhilfe
  17. Der Frankfurter und Homburger Freundeskreis (1796 - 1800)
  18. Consumerist lifestyles in the context of globalization
  19. Rollstuhlrugby - Kurzportrait einer spannenden Sportart
  20. Das gegliederte Schulwesen aus anthropologischer Sicht
  21. Carbon Management Accounting and Reporting in Practice
  22. Editorial zum Schwerpunktthema "Medien statt Gedächtnis"
  23. Geography and the maritime potential of China and Iran
  24. Selbstreflexion akademischen Schreibhandelns anstoßen
  25. Ecological-economic modeling for biodiversity management
  26. Generative Phänomenologie in feministischer Perspektive
  27. Die Verpackungsverordnung aus umweltökonomischer Sicht
  28. Public responses to climate change and low-carbon energy
  29. Risalendo alla Fonte Castalia tra Arte, Storia e Scienza
  30. Personalstruktur und Typenzwang im Hochschulrahmenrecht
  31. Schreiben und Medien - Medienspezifische Schreibprozesse
  32. Influence of Different Biogenic Fuels on Base Oil Aging
  33. Validität des NEPS-Mathematiktests für die neunte Klasse
  34. Bewegte Sprache – Ein Leben mit und für Mehrsprachigkeit
  35. Systematic feature evaluation for gene name recognition
  36. Multimediale Lernumgebungen für das Fremdsprachenlernen
  37. Russland: Energieeffizienz und Klimaschutz kommen zu kurz
  38. Divergent Perceptions of Peace in Post-Conflict Societies:
  39. Harnessing place attachment for local climate mitigation?
  40. Kompetenzen und Bildung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung
  41. Origins and practices of genetic risk and responsibility
  42. Modell „Phasen und Handlungen akademischer Textproduktion“
  43. Die Nihilisierung des Nihilismus - Alfred Seidel (1895-1924)