Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia: A Health Economic Evaluation

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia: A Health Economic Evaluation. / Thiart, Hanne; Ebert, David Daniel; Lehr, Dirk et al.
in: Sleep, Jahrgang 39, Nr. 10, 01.10.2016, S. 1769-1778.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Thiart H, Ebert DD, Lehr D, Nobis S, Buntrock C, Berking M et al. Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia: A Health Economic Evaluation. Sleep. 2016 Okt 1;39(10):1769-1778. doi: 10.5665/sleep.6152

Bibtex

@article{a8b43f03fe664e58bbf2a762edc34f39,
title = "Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia: A Health Economic Evaluation",
abstract = "Study Objectives: Lost productivity caused by insomnia is a common and costly problem for employers. Although evidence for the efficacy of Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (iCBT-I) already exists, little is known about its economic effects. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of providing iCBT-I to symptomatic employees from the employer's perspective. Methods: School teachers (N = 128) with clinically significant insomnia symptoms and work-related rumination were randomized to guided iCBT-I or a waitlist-control-group, both with access to treatment as usual. Economic data were collected at baseline and 6-mo follow-up. We conducted (1) a costeffectiveness analysis with treatment response (Reliable Change [decline of 5.01 points] and Insomnia Severity Index < 8 at 6-month follow-up) as the outcome and (2) a cost-benefit analysis. Because both analyses were performed from the employer's perspective, we focused specifically on absenteeism and presenteeism costs. Statistical uncertainty was estimated using bootstrapping. Results: Assuming intervention costs of €200 ($245), cost-effectiveness analyses showed that at a willingness-to-pay of €0 for each positive treatment response, there is an 87% probability that the intervention is more cost effective than treatment as usual alone. Cost-benefit analyses led to a net benefit of €418 (95% confidence interval: -593.03 to 1,488.70) ($512) per participant and a return on investment of 208% (95% confidence interval: -296.52 to 744.35). The reduction in costs was mainly driven by the effects of the intervention on presenteeism and to a lesser degree by reduced absenteeism. Conclusions: Focusing on sleep improvement using iCBT-I may be a cost-effective strategy in occupational health care.",
keywords = "Psychology, cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, employer perspective, insomnia, randomized controlled trial, self-help, Internet, Business psychology, Digital media",
author = "Hanne Thiart and Ebert, {David Daniel} and Dirk Lehr and Stephanie Nobis and Claudia Buntrock and Matthias Berking and Filip Smit and Heleen Riper",
year = "2016",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.5665/sleep.6152",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "1769--1778",
journal = "Sleep",
issn = "0161-8105",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia

T2 - A Health Economic Evaluation

AU - Thiart, Hanne

AU - Ebert, David Daniel

AU - Lehr, Dirk

AU - Nobis, Stephanie

AU - Buntrock, Claudia

AU - Berking, Matthias

AU - Smit, Filip

AU - Riper, Heleen

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Study Objectives: Lost productivity caused by insomnia is a common and costly problem for employers. Although evidence for the efficacy of Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (iCBT-I) already exists, little is known about its economic effects. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of providing iCBT-I to symptomatic employees from the employer's perspective. Methods: School teachers (N = 128) with clinically significant insomnia symptoms and work-related rumination were randomized to guided iCBT-I or a waitlist-control-group, both with access to treatment as usual. Economic data were collected at baseline and 6-mo follow-up. We conducted (1) a costeffectiveness analysis with treatment response (Reliable Change [decline of 5.01 points] and Insomnia Severity Index < 8 at 6-month follow-up) as the outcome and (2) a cost-benefit analysis. Because both analyses were performed from the employer's perspective, we focused specifically on absenteeism and presenteeism costs. Statistical uncertainty was estimated using bootstrapping. Results: Assuming intervention costs of €200 ($245), cost-effectiveness analyses showed that at a willingness-to-pay of €0 for each positive treatment response, there is an 87% probability that the intervention is more cost effective than treatment as usual alone. Cost-benefit analyses led to a net benefit of €418 (95% confidence interval: -593.03 to 1,488.70) ($512) per participant and a return on investment of 208% (95% confidence interval: -296.52 to 744.35). The reduction in costs was mainly driven by the effects of the intervention on presenteeism and to a lesser degree by reduced absenteeism. Conclusions: Focusing on sleep improvement using iCBT-I may be a cost-effective strategy in occupational health care.

AB - Study Objectives: Lost productivity caused by insomnia is a common and costly problem for employers. Although evidence for the efficacy of Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (iCBT-I) already exists, little is known about its economic effects. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of providing iCBT-I to symptomatic employees from the employer's perspective. Methods: School teachers (N = 128) with clinically significant insomnia symptoms and work-related rumination were randomized to guided iCBT-I or a waitlist-control-group, both with access to treatment as usual. Economic data were collected at baseline and 6-mo follow-up. We conducted (1) a costeffectiveness analysis with treatment response (Reliable Change [decline of 5.01 points] and Insomnia Severity Index < 8 at 6-month follow-up) as the outcome and (2) a cost-benefit analysis. Because both analyses were performed from the employer's perspective, we focused specifically on absenteeism and presenteeism costs. Statistical uncertainty was estimated using bootstrapping. Results: Assuming intervention costs of €200 ($245), cost-effectiveness analyses showed that at a willingness-to-pay of €0 for each positive treatment response, there is an 87% probability that the intervention is more cost effective than treatment as usual alone. Cost-benefit analyses led to a net benefit of €418 (95% confidence interval: -593.03 to 1,488.70) ($512) per participant and a return on investment of 208% (95% confidence interval: -296.52 to 744.35). The reduction in costs was mainly driven by the effects of the intervention on presenteeism and to a lesser degree by reduced absenteeism. Conclusions: Focusing on sleep improvement using iCBT-I may be a cost-effective strategy in occupational health care.

KW - Psychology

KW - cost-benefit

KW - cost-effectiveness

KW - employer perspective

KW - insomnia

KW - randomized controlled trial

KW - self-help

KW - Internet

KW - Business psychology

KW - Digital media

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992390436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5665/sleep.6152

DO - 10.5665/sleep.6152

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 27450686

VL - 39

SP - 1769

EP - 1778

JO - Sleep

JF - Sleep

SN - 0161-8105

IS - 10

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. ‘The song factories have closed!’
  2. Local and landscape level variables influence butterfly diversity in critically endangered South African renosterveld
  3. Reciprocal relations between emotional exhaustion and episode-specific emotional labour: An experience-sampling study
  4. Islam and Patriarchy
  5. Plant diversity and composition compensate for negative effects of urbanization on foraging bumble bees
  6. Über die Krise einer unverwüstlichen Lebensform
  7. Significance of Antibiotics in the Environment
  8. Pre-COVID-19 pandemic health-related behaviours in children (2018-2020) and association with being tested for SARS-CoV-2 and testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 (2020-2021)
  9. Improvising Digital Transformation
  10. Meta-analytic cointegrating rank tests for dependent panels
  11. Welcome to the (label) jungle? Analyzing how consumers deal with intra-sustainability label trade-offs on food
  12. Multiple components of plant diversity loss determine herbivore phylogenetic diversity in a subtropical forest experiment
  13. Hierarchie
  14. Gender-specific perspectives of mangrove ecosystem services
  15. Vorstellung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung von Lernstrategien in mathematikhaltigen Studiengängen.
  16. Technökologien
  17. Does syndication with local venture capitalists moderate the effects of geographical and institutional distances?
  18. Coopération, confiance et réussite — Considerations théoriques et résultants empiriques
  19. Moréas, Jean [d. i. Joannis Papadiamantopoulos] (1856-1910)
  20. Öffentliche Bibliothek
  21. III. FORMAL CREATURES: GILLES CHÂTELET ’S METAPHORS
  22. Forming of aesthetic judgements in movement
  23. Marketing in kleinen und mittelständischen Unternehmen
  24. Strategic Practice Drift
  25. “Dann verfügen wir über Instrumente…”: Äußerungsbefugnisse von Mitgliedern der EU-Kommission
  26. § 289d Nutzung von Rahmenwerken
  27. Public Value - Organisationen machen Gesellschaft
  28. Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement in der öffentlichen Verwaltung
  29. Translation