Intergroup conflict and third-party intervention: social identities at the negotiation table

Publikation: Bücher und AnthologienMonografienForschung

Standard

Intergroup conflict and third-party intervention : social identities at the negotiation table. / Loschelder, David D.

Uelvesbüll : Der Andere Verlag, 2013. 103 S.

Publikation: Bücher und AnthologienMonografienForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@book{58c5f9bb49ed4c1bb9051d10a26364ac,
title = "Intergroup conflict and third-party intervention: social identities at the negotiation table",
abstract = "The present dissertation examines an identity-based third-party intervention as a means to alleviate competitive, conflict-laden intergroup negotiations. Although intergroup negotiations between opposing group representatives are likely to result in impasse and suboptimal outcomes, little is known about specific means to overcome these impairments. To address this shortcoming it is assumed that intergroup negotiations are resolved more effectively when they involve a mediator who promotes the construction of a common ingroup identity between opposing representatives. Five studies are reported examining the newly developed common-identity mediation{"} (CIM) intervention in a professional mediation context (Field Study; N = 117), in an integrative win-win negotiation (Experiment 1; N = 100), in a distributive zero sum context (Experiment 2; N = 160), and in competitive intergroup disputes (Experiments 3 & 4; N = 160; N = 190). In addition, the effectiveness of CIM is compared to two well-established dispute resolution procedures. The underlying mechanism accounting for the beneficial CIM effects is examined (Experiments 2-4), and a moderating boundary condition for its applicability is illustrated (Experiment 4). Implications for negotiations, dispute resolution, social identity research, and third-party intervention are discussed.",
keywords = "Psychology, Soziale Identit{\"a}t, Inter-Gruppenkonflikt, Meditation",
author = "Loschelder, {David D.}",
note = "Zugl.: Trier, Univ., Diss., 2013 ",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-86247-344-1",
publisher = "Der Andere Verlag",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Intergroup conflict and third-party intervention

T2 - social identities at the negotiation table

AU - Loschelder, David D.

N1 - Zugl.: Trier, Univ., Diss., 2013

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The present dissertation examines an identity-based third-party intervention as a means to alleviate competitive, conflict-laden intergroup negotiations. Although intergroup negotiations between opposing group representatives are likely to result in impasse and suboptimal outcomes, little is known about specific means to overcome these impairments. To address this shortcoming it is assumed that intergroup negotiations are resolved more effectively when they involve a mediator who promotes the construction of a common ingroup identity between opposing representatives. Five studies are reported examining the newly developed common-identity mediation" (CIM) intervention in a professional mediation context (Field Study; N = 117), in an integrative win-win negotiation (Experiment 1; N = 100), in a distributive zero sum context (Experiment 2; N = 160), and in competitive intergroup disputes (Experiments 3 & 4; N = 160; N = 190). In addition, the effectiveness of CIM is compared to two well-established dispute resolution procedures. The underlying mechanism accounting for the beneficial CIM effects is examined (Experiments 2-4), and a moderating boundary condition for its applicability is illustrated (Experiment 4). Implications for negotiations, dispute resolution, social identity research, and third-party intervention are discussed.

AB - The present dissertation examines an identity-based third-party intervention as a means to alleviate competitive, conflict-laden intergroup negotiations. Although intergroup negotiations between opposing group representatives are likely to result in impasse and suboptimal outcomes, little is known about specific means to overcome these impairments. To address this shortcoming it is assumed that intergroup negotiations are resolved more effectively when they involve a mediator who promotes the construction of a common ingroup identity between opposing representatives. Five studies are reported examining the newly developed common-identity mediation" (CIM) intervention in a professional mediation context (Field Study; N = 117), in an integrative win-win negotiation (Experiment 1; N = 100), in a distributive zero sum context (Experiment 2; N = 160), and in competitive intergroup disputes (Experiments 3 & 4; N = 160; N = 190). In addition, the effectiveness of CIM is compared to two well-established dispute resolution procedures. The underlying mechanism accounting for the beneficial CIM effects is examined (Experiments 2-4), and a moderating boundary condition for its applicability is illustrated (Experiment 4). Implications for negotiations, dispute resolution, social identity research, and third-party intervention are discussed.

KW - Psychology

KW - Soziale Identität

KW - Inter-Gruppenkonflikt

KW - Meditation

UR - https://d-nb.info/1032920769

M3 - Monographs

SN - 978-3-86247-344-1

BT - Intergroup conflict and third-party intervention

PB - Der Andere Verlag

CY - Uelvesbüll

ER -