Integrating resilience thinking and optimisation for conservation

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Integrating resilience thinking and optimisation for conservation. / Fischer, J.; Gardner, T. A.; Gordon, Line J. et al.
in: Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Jahrgang 24, Nr. 10, 10.2009, S. 549-554.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Fischer, J, Gardner, TA, Gordon, LJ, Fazey, I, Elmqvist, T, Felton, A, Folke, C, Dovers, S & Peterson, G 2009, 'Integrating resilience thinking and optimisation for conservation', Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Jg. 24, Nr. 10, S. 549-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.020

APA

Fischer, J., Gardner, T. A., Gordon, L. J., Fazey, I., Elmqvist, T., Felton, A., Folke, C., Dovers, S., & Peterson, G. (2009). Integrating resilience thinking and optimisation for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(10), 549-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.020

Vancouver

Fischer J, Gardner TA, Gordon LJ, Fazey I, Elmqvist T, Felton A et al. Integrating resilience thinking and optimisation for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2009 Okt;24(10):549-554. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.020

Bibtex

@article{2ade6375233344d4bcf40fcfa25208b5,
title = "Integrating resilience thinking and optimisation for conservation",
abstract = "Conservation strategies need to be both effective and efficient to be successful. To this end, two bodies of research should be integrated, namely 'resilience thinking' and 'optimisation for conservation,' both of which are highly policy relevant but to date have evolved largely separately. Resilience thinking provides an integrated perspective for analysis, emphasising the potential of nonlinear changes and the interdependency of social and ecological systems. By contrast, optimisation for conservation is an outcome-oriented tool that recognises resource scarcity and the need to make rational and transparent decisions. Here we propose that actively embedding optimisation analyses within a resilience-thinking framework could draw on the complementary strengths of the two bodies of work, thereby promoting cost-effective and enduring conservation outcomes.",
keywords = "Environmental planning",
author = "J. Fischer and Gardner, {T. A.} and Gordon, {Line J.} and Ioan Fazey and T. Elmqvist and A. Felton and C. Folke and Stephen Dovers and Garry Peterson",
note = "Times Cited: 2",
year = "2009",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.020",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "549--554",
journal = "Trends in Ecology & Evolution",
issn = "0169-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating resilience thinking and optimisation for conservation

AU - Fischer, J.

AU - Gardner, T. A.

AU - Gordon, Line J.

AU - Fazey, Ioan

AU - Elmqvist, T.

AU - Felton, A.

AU - Folke, C.

AU - Dovers, Stephen

AU - Peterson, Garry

N1 - Times Cited: 2

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - Conservation strategies need to be both effective and efficient to be successful. To this end, two bodies of research should be integrated, namely 'resilience thinking' and 'optimisation for conservation,' both of which are highly policy relevant but to date have evolved largely separately. Resilience thinking provides an integrated perspective for analysis, emphasising the potential of nonlinear changes and the interdependency of social and ecological systems. By contrast, optimisation for conservation is an outcome-oriented tool that recognises resource scarcity and the need to make rational and transparent decisions. Here we propose that actively embedding optimisation analyses within a resilience-thinking framework could draw on the complementary strengths of the two bodies of work, thereby promoting cost-effective and enduring conservation outcomes.

AB - Conservation strategies need to be both effective and efficient to be successful. To this end, two bodies of research should be integrated, namely 'resilience thinking' and 'optimisation for conservation,' both of which are highly policy relevant but to date have evolved largely separately. Resilience thinking provides an integrated perspective for analysis, emphasising the potential of nonlinear changes and the interdependency of social and ecological systems. By contrast, optimisation for conservation is an outcome-oriented tool that recognises resource scarcity and the need to make rational and transparent decisions. Here we propose that actively embedding optimisation analyses within a resilience-thinking framework could draw on the complementary strengths of the two bodies of work, thereby promoting cost-effective and enduring conservation outcomes.

KW - Environmental planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69749116500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.020

DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.020

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 19665820

VL - 24

SP - 549

EP - 554

JO - Trends in Ecology & Evolution

JF - Trends in Ecology & Evolution

SN - 0169-5347

IS - 10

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. High temperature deformation mechanisms and processing map for hot working of cast-homogenized Mg-3Sn-2Ca alloy
  2. Boundaryless working hours and recovery in Germany
  3. Soziale Netzwerkanalyse
  4. Communicating CCS
  5. The Multiple Self Objection to the Prudential Lifespan Account
  6. Does Job Satisfaction Adapt to Working Conditions?
  7. To err is Human, To Explain and Correct is Divine: A Study of Interactive Erroneous Examples with Middle School Math Students.
  8. What is normal?
  9. On the geometric control of internal forces in power grasps
  10. How and where to map supply and demand of ecosystem services for policy-relevant outcomes?
  11. Multitrait-multimethod-analysis
  12. Introduction
  13. New prototype of the two-legged robot centaurob
  14. Introduction
  15. Commitment Strategies for Sustainability
  16. IFIP WG 13.5 workshop on resilience, reliability, safety and human error in system development
  17. A theoretical multiscale analysis of electrical field for fuel cells stack structures
  18. Worauf warten?
  19. A hybrid hydraulic piezo actuator modeling and hysteresis effect identification for control in camless internal combustion engines
  20. Towards a Critique of Social Networking
  21. Influence of clouds on the photochemical degradation in aqueous phase - II
  22. Determiner Ellipsis in Electronic Writing - Discourse or Syntax?
  23. To Row Together or Paddle One's Own Canoe? Simulating Strategies to Spur Digital Platform Growth
  24. Bolt load retention and creep response of AS41 alloyed with 0.15% Ca
  25. Introduction
  26. Dynamic Capabilities in Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  27. The path biography methodology
  28. Vocational exploration: Multivariate predictors and effect on confidence development in adolescence