Integrating knowledge within and between knowledge types in transdisciplinary sustainability research: Seven case studies and an indicator framework

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Integrating knowledge within and between knowledge types in transdisciplinary sustainability research: Seven case studies and an indicator framework. / Karrasch, Leena; Grothmann, Torsten; Michel, T. A. et al.
in: Environmental Science and Policy, Jahrgang 131, 05.2022, S. 14-25.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{0a12d8996d21475687b076e6f61baf64,
title = "Integrating knowledge within and between knowledge types in transdisciplinary sustainability research: Seven case studies and an indicator framework",
abstract = "Transdisciplinary research aims to generate knowledge through science-practice interactions and is attracting increasing attention in sustainability science. However,sustainable development is characterized by vast complexities and context specificities, with a broad spectrum of relevant actors. Transdisciplinary research projects targeting at socio-ecological transformations, therefore, require the integration of different bodies of knowledge from diverse actors to gain an accurate and comprehensive understanding of existing problems and potential solutions. This knowledge integration involves both the active exchange of knowledge and the creation of a joint understanding of problems and solutions. Hence, the focus of this article is to analyse how and why knowledge integration is successful in transdisciplinary research processes. We conceptualize and define knowledge types and goals of knowledge integration. By analysing seven transdisciplinary research projects, we develop and empirically test indicators for knowledge integration. We examine knowledge integration (i) within three specific knowledge types (systems, target, and transformative knowledge), and (ii) between these different knowledge types. Furthermore, we reflect on the roles of researchers and non-academic actors. The description, comparison and discussion of knowledge integration lead to the identification of barriers and success factors to improve such processes in transdisciplinary research activities.",
keywords = "Case study analyses, Evaluation, Knowledge integration, Participation, Transdisciplinary research, Environmental Governance",
author = "Leena Karrasch and Torsten Grothmann and Michel, {T. A.} and Maren Wesselow and Henner Wolter and Alexandra Unger and Alkje Wegner and Diana Giebels and Bernd Siebenh{\"u}ner",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022",
year = "2022",
month = may,
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.014",
language = "English",
volume = "131",
pages = "14--25",
journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating knowledge within and between knowledge types in transdisciplinary sustainability research

T2 - Seven case studies and an indicator framework

AU - Karrasch, Leena

AU - Grothmann, Torsten

AU - Michel, T. A.

AU - Wesselow, Maren

AU - Wolter, Henner

AU - Unger, Alexandra

AU - Wegner, Alkje

AU - Giebels, Diana

AU - Siebenhüner, Bernd

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022

PY - 2022/5

Y1 - 2022/5

N2 - Transdisciplinary research aims to generate knowledge through science-practice interactions and is attracting increasing attention in sustainability science. However,sustainable development is characterized by vast complexities and context specificities, with a broad spectrum of relevant actors. Transdisciplinary research projects targeting at socio-ecological transformations, therefore, require the integration of different bodies of knowledge from diverse actors to gain an accurate and comprehensive understanding of existing problems and potential solutions. This knowledge integration involves both the active exchange of knowledge and the creation of a joint understanding of problems and solutions. Hence, the focus of this article is to analyse how and why knowledge integration is successful in transdisciplinary research processes. We conceptualize and define knowledge types and goals of knowledge integration. By analysing seven transdisciplinary research projects, we develop and empirically test indicators for knowledge integration. We examine knowledge integration (i) within three specific knowledge types (systems, target, and transformative knowledge), and (ii) between these different knowledge types. Furthermore, we reflect on the roles of researchers and non-academic actors. The description, comparison and discussion of knowledge integration lead to the identification of barriers and success factors to improve such processes in transdisciplinary research activities.

AB - Transdisciplinary research aims to generate knowledge through science-practice interactions and is attracting increasing attention in sustainability science. However,sustainable development is characterized by vast complexities and context specificities, with a broad spectrum of relevant actors. Transdisciplinary research projects targeting at socio-ecological transformations, therefore, require the integration of different bodies of knowledge from diverse actors to gain an accurate and comprehensive understanding of existing problems and potential solutions. This knowledge integration involves both the active exchange of knowledge and the creation of a joint understanding of problems and solutions. Hence, the focus of this article is to analyse how and why knowledge integration is successful in transdisciplinary research processes. We conceptualize and define knowledge types and goals of knowledge integration. By analysing seven transdisciplinary research projects, we develop and empirically test indicators for knowledge integration. We examine knowledge integration (i) within three specific knowledge types (systems, target, and transformative knowledge), and (ii) between these different knowledge types. Furthermore, we reflect on the roles of researchers and non-academic actors. The description, comparison and discussion of knowledge integration lead to the identification of barriers and success factors to improve such processes in transdisciplinary research activities.

KW - Case study analyses

KW - Evaluation

KW - Knowledge integration

KW - Participation

KW - Transdisciplinary research

KW - Environmental Governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123351247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.014

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.014

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85123351247

VL - 131

SP - 14

EP - 25

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Aktivitäten

  1. Journal of Pragmatics (Zeitschrift)
  2. Network-Based Analysis of Lagrangian Transport and Mixing
  3. Journal of Vocational Behavior (Fachzeitschrift)
  4. Universalism and sameness: looking back and looking forward
  5. A daily diary study on humor at work: Some preliminary findings
  6. Faradaysche Käfige
  7. Pan's papers
  8. A propos de 'Land of Thorns': Le conflit en Karamoja
  9. A Cross-Disciplinary Model of Organizational Practices for Prolonged Working Lives
  10. Touching Land. Creative Practices for Planetary Be/Longings
  11. Wirtschaftsinformatik - Nachwuchstreffen 2024
  12. Conference - International Class Action Conference: From Class Actions to Collective Redress
  13. Hans Blumenbergs "Philosophie der Entängstigung"
  14. Representing Future Generations in Parliament
  15. Creating Space for Academic Feedom: Progressive Liberal Education in a German Public University
  16. Intersectionality as a lens to educational inequalities during and after the COVID-19 pandemic
  17. Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management - AOM 2008
  18. Towards the Design of Active Pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) mineralizing readily in the Environment
  19. SIIVE-Tagung 2015
  20. Unboxing Amazon – How Amazon is taking over (public) infrastructures and why we should care
  21. Round Table Gespräch des Transformationsworkshop "JPI-Climate – Transformation Review" - JPI 2013
  22. Ecology Without Nature and Anthropocene Without Anthropos: Perspectives from the Critical Animal Studies
  23. Posterpräsentation: Teaching wheelchair basketball in PE lessons
  24. Sanctions, aid, and Syria's future: Navigating EU policy in a post-Assad era
  25. Journal of Research on Technology in Education (Fachzeitschrift)