Improved sensorimotor control is not connected with improved proprioception

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenKonferenz-Abstracts in FachzeitschriftenForschung

Standard

Improved sensorimotor control is not connected with improved proprioception. / Haas, C. T.; Schulze-Cleven, K.; Turbanski, Stephan et al.
in: British Journal of Sports Medicine, Jahrgang 39, Nr. 6, 65, 2005, S. 388.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenKonferenz-Abstracts in FachzeitschriftenForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{b9e4af09195b47038d48fdd7583538df,
title = "Improved sensorimotor control is not connected with improved proprioception",
abstract = "Purpose: To analyse whether improved sensorimotor control is based on improved proprioceptive capabilities. Methods: In total, 15 physical education students participated in the study. All subjects performed five series, taking 60 seconds each, of random whole body vibration. This treatment is known to improve postural control rapidly. Pre-treatment and post-treatment proprioceptive capabilities were tested using a specially constructed device. Via a goniometer fixed at the knee, joint subjects had to reproduce a slowly oscillating course, which was presented at a computer screen by knee extension and flexion. No feedback concerning success of the task was given. Before testing started, all subjects performed a couple of training sessions, thus they were able to reproduce the course precisely. Results: Performance of subjects was interindividually variable but intraindividually constant–that is, some subjects generated overshooting errors others produced undershooting errors. On average, the amplitude was 1 degree lower compared with the presented course. This error resulted from undershooting errors at both endpoints. Pre-treatment and post-treatment comparison showed only small and statistically insignificant (p>0.05) differences in all analysed parameters: amplitude, maximum endpoint, minimum endpoint, and rhythm. Conclusions: As the treatment leads to a strongly improved postural control of 20–30% (p<0.01) while proprioceptive capabilities do not change, it must be concluded that positive modifications of sensorimotor control can not be explained by an increased perceptive performance. Consequently, other mechanism that might explain these neuromuscular improvements have to be identified. We speculate about changes in interneurone function as well as about modifications in the supraspinal areas, such as in the supplementary motor area.",
keywords = "Physical education and sports",
author = "Haas, {C. T.} and K. Schulze-Cleven and Stephan Turbanski and Dietmar Schmidtbleicher",
note = "1st World Congress of Sports Injury Prevention",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "388",
journal = "British Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0306-3674",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improved sensorimotor control is not connected with improved proprioception

AU - Haas, C. T.

AU - Schulze-Cleven, K.

AU - Turbanski, Stephan

AU - Schmidtbleicher, Dietmar

N1 - 1st World Congress of Sports Injury Prevention

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Purpose: To analyse whether improved sensorimotor control is based on improved proprioceptive capabilities. Methods: In total, 15 physical education students participated in the study. All subjects performed five series, taking 60 seconds each, of random whole body vibration. This treatment is known to improve postural control rapidly. Pre-treatment and post-treatment proprioceptive capabilities were tested using a specially constructed device. Via a goniometer fixed at the knee, joint subjects had to reproduce a slowly oscillating course, which was presented at a computer screen by knee extension and flexion. No feedback concerning success of the task was given. Before testing started, all subjects performed a couple of training sessions, thus they were able to reproduce the course precisely. Results: Performance of subjects was interindividually variable but intraindividually constant–that is, some subjects generated overshooting errors others produced undershooting errors. On average, the amplitude was 1 degree lower compared with the presented course. This error resulted from undershooting errors at both endpoints. Pre-treatment and post-treatment comparison showed only small and statistically insignificant (p>0.05) differences in all analysed parameters: amplitude, maximum endpoint, minimum endpoint, and rhythm. Conclusions: As the treatment leads to a strongly improved postural control of 20–30% (p<0.01) while proprioceptive capabilities do not change, it must be concluded that positive modifications of sensorimotor control can not be explained by an increased perceptive performance. Consequently, other mechanism that might explain these neuromuscular improvements have to be identified. We speculate about changes in interneurone function as well as about modifications in the supraspinal areas, such as in the supplementary motor area.

AB - Purpose: To analyse whether improved sensorimotor control is based on improved proprioceptive capabilities. Methods: In total, 15 physical education students participated in the study. All subjects performed five series, taking 60 seconds each, of random whole body vibration. This treatment is known to improve postural control rapidly. Pre-treatment and post-treatment proprioceptive capabilities were tested using a specially constructed device. Via a goniometer fixed at the knee, joint subjects had to reproduce a slowly oscillating course, which was presented at a computer screen by knee extension and flexion. No feedback concerning success of the task was given. Before testing started, all subjects performed a couple of training sessions, thus they were able to reproduce the course precisely. Results: Performance of subjects was interindividually variable but intraindividually constant–that is, some subjects generated overshooting errors others produced undershooting errors. On average, the amplitude was 1 degree lower compared with the presented course. This error resulted from undershooting errors at both endpoints. Pre-treatment and post-treatment comparison showed only small and statistically insignificant (p>0.05) differences in all analysed parameters: amplitude, maximum endpoint, minimum endpoint, and rhythm. Conclusions: As the treatment leads to a strongly improved postural control of 20–30% (p<0.01) while proprioceptive capabilities do not change, it must be concluded that positive modifications of sensorimotor control can not be explained by an increased perceptive performance. Consequently, other mechanism that might explain these neuromuscular improvements have to be identified. We speculate about changes in interneurone function as well as about modifications in the supraspinal areas, such as in the supplementary motor area.

KW - Physical education and sports

M3 - Conference abstract in journal

VL - 39

SP - 388

JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0306-3674

IS - 6

M1 - 65

ER -

Links

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Trajectory tracking using MPC and a velocity observer for flat actuator systems in automotive applications
  2. Interactions between ecosystem properties and land use clarify spatial strategies to optimize trade-offs between agriculture and species conservation
  3. Multiphase-field modeling of temperature-driven intermetallic compound evolution in an Al-Mg system for application to solid-state joining processes
  4. HAWK - hybrid question answering using linked data
  5. Erroneous examples as desirable difficulty
  6. Student Game Design for Language Learning
  7. The identification of up-And downstream industries using input-output tables and a firm-level application to minority shareholdings
  8. Automatic three-dimensional geometry and mesh generation of periodic representative volume elements for matrix-inclusion composites
  9. Head turn scaling below the threshold of perception in immersive virtual environments
  10. Implicit and explicit horizons
  11. Cue predictability changes scaling in eye-movement fluctuations
  12. Quantum computing
  13. How alloying and processing effects can influence the microstructure and mechanical properties of directly extruded thin zinc wires
  14. Constructing strangeness
  15. Public perceptions of CCS in context
  16. Cobalt in end-of-life products in the EU, where does it end up? - The MaTrace approach
  17. Systematic feature evaluation for gene name recognition
  18. Digital Business Transformation and the Changing Role of the IT Function
  19. The buffering effect of selection, optimization, and compensation strategy use on the relationship between problem solving demands and occupational well-being
  20. (How) Can didactic research find its way into the classroom? Results from a questionnaire survey on the lesson preparation and continuing professional development of German teachers
  21. Adaptive control of the nonlinear dynamic behavior of the cantilever-sample system of an atomic force microscope
  22. Non-acceptances in context
  23. Toward Data-Driven Analyses of Electronic Text Books
  24. The Benefit of Web- and Computer-Based Interventions for Stress
  25. Knowledge Decolonization à la Grounded Theory
  26. Root-root interactions: extending our perspective to be more inclusive of the range of theories in ecology and agriculture using in-vivo analyses
  27. Modelling, explaining, enacting and getting feedback: How can the acquisition of core practices in teacher education be optimally fostered?
  28. What factors enable social-ecological transformative potential? The role of learning practices, empowerment, and networking
  29. Experience from downscaling IPCC-SRES scenarios to specific national-level focus scenarios for ecosystem service management
  30. Peter's positions: a diffractive analysis of authority in a year one classroom
  31. Complex Trait-Treatment-Interaction analysis
  32. Unveiling local knowledge