How numeric advice precision affects advice taking

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

How numeric advice precision affects advice taking. / Schultze, Thomas; Loschelder, David D.
in: Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Jahrgang 34, Nr. 3, 07.2021, S. 303-310.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Schultze T, Loschelder DD. How numeric advice precision affects advice taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2021 Jul;34(3):303-310. Epub 2020 Sep 29. doi: 10.1002/bdm.2211

Bibtex

@article{f8e04f2a2d90435f8e4ec7ce9e22dccb,
title = "How numeric advice precision affects advice taking",
abstract = "Advice is a powerful means to improve peoples' judgments and decisions. Because advice quality is rarely apparent, decision‐makers must infer it from the characteristics of the advisor or the advice itself. Here, we focus on a largely neglected advice characteristic that should signal quality: advice precision. In a preregistered, high‐powered study (N = 195), we tested the effects of advice precision on advice taking. Drawing from past research and theorizing on anchor precision, we derived and tested two competing hypotheses for the relation of advice precision and advice taking—one predicting a monotone increase in advice taking when advice precision increases and the other predicting a backfiring effect of overly precise advice resulting in an inverted U‐shape. Our results support the notion of a monotone, albeit not a strong monotone, relationship. Higher perceived advice quality correlated with individuals' advice taking. Consistent with the idea that advice precision serves as a cue for advice quality, the effect of advice precision on advice taking was statistically mediated by perceived advice quality. Although the mediation analysis does not allow for causal interpretation because we did not manipulate the mediating variable, it shows that the effect of advice precision on advice taking is not merely a demand effect. Implications of our findings for theory and practice are discussed.",
keywords = "Business psychology, advice taking, judment and decision making, numerical precision, social influence",
author = "Thomas Schultze and Loschelder, {David D.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2021",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1002/bdm.2211",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "303--310",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Decision Making",
issn = "0894-3257",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How numeric advice precision affects advice taking

AU - Schultze, Thomas

AU - Loschelder, David D.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2021/7

Y1 - 2021/7

N2 - Advice is a powerful means to improve peoples' judgments and decisions. Because advice quality is rarely apparent, decision‐makers must infer it from the characteristics of the advisor or the advice itself. Here, we focus on a largely neglected advice characteristic that should signal quality: advice precision. In a preregistered, high‐powered study (N = 195), we tested the effects of advice precision on advice taking. Drawing from past research and theorizing on anchor precision, we derived and tested two competing hypotheses for the relation of advice precision and advice taking—one predicting a monotone increase in advice taking when advice precision increases and the other predicting a backfiring effect of overly precise advice resulting in an inverted U‐shape. Our results support the notion of a monotone, albeit not a strong monotone, relationship. Higher perceived advice quality correlated with individuals' advice taking. Consistent with the idea that advice precision serves as a cue for advice quality, the effect of advice precision on advice taking was statistically mediated by perceived advice quality. Although the mediation analysis does not allow for causal interpretation because we did not manipulate the mediating variable, it shows that the effect of advice precision on advice taking is not merely a demand effect. Implications of our findings for theory and practice are discussed.

AB - Advice is a powerful means to improve peoples' judgments and decisions. Because advice quality is rarely apparent, decision‐makers must infer it from the characteristics of the advisor or the advice itself. Here, we focus on a largely neglected advice characteristic that should signal quality: advice precision. In a preregistered, high‐powered study (N = 195), we tested the effects of advice precision on advice taking. Drawing from past research and theorizing on anchor precision, we derived and tested two competing hypotheses for the relation of advice precision and advice taking—one predicting a monotone increase in advice taking when advice precision increases and the other predicting a backfiring effect of overly precise advice resulting in an inverted U‐shape. Our results support the notion of a monotone, albeit not a strong monotone, relationship. Higher perceived advice quality correlated with individuals' advice taking. Consistent with the idea that advice precision serves as a cue for advice quality, the effect of advice precision on advice taking was statistically mediated by perceived advice quality. Although the mediation analysis does not allow for causal interpretation because we did not manipulate the mediating variable, it shows that the effect of advice precision on advice taking is not merely a demand effect. Implications of our findings for theory and practice are discussed.

KW - Business psychology

KW - advice taking

KW - judment and decision making

KW - numerical precision

KW - social influence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091604410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bdm.2211

DO - 10.1002/bdm.2211

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 34

SP - 303

EP - 310

JO - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

JF - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

SN - 0894-3257

IS - 3

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Peter Leonhard

Publikationen

  1. The State of Multimedia Mass-Balance Modeling in Environmental science and decision-making
  2. The utility of macroecological rules for microbial biogeography
  3. Microstructure and hardness evolution of laser metal deposited AA5087 wall-structures
  4. THEORY OF PEDAGOGICAL BEHAVIOR - GERMAN - KORING,B
  5. Multimodal analysis of spatially heterogeneous microstructural refinement and softening mechanisms in three-pass friction stir processed Al-4Si alloy
  6. Living Labs for Product Circularity: Learnings from the ‘Innovation Network aiming at Sustainable Smartphones’
  7. Public Value
  8. Bryophytes and organic layers control uptake of airborne nitrogen in low-N environments
  9. Similarity of molecular descriptors: The equivalence of Zagreb indices and walk counts
  10. What workers want: job satisfaction in the U.S.
  11. Repatriation, Public Programming, and the DEAI Toolkit
  12. Soziale Netzwerkanalyse
  13. Communicating CCS
  14. The Multiple Self Objection to the Prudential Lifespan Account
  15. Does Job Satisfaction Adapt to Working Conditions?
  16. Entrepreneurial actions
  17. Managing Knowledge in Organization Studies Through Instrumentation
  18. The Continuities of Twitter Strategies and Algorithmic Terror
  19. Urgent need for updating the slogan of global climate actions from 'tree planting' to 'restore native vegetation'
  20. Working time flexibility and work-life balance
  21. Multitrait-multimethod-analysis
  22. The measurement of work ability
  23. On-Board-Diagnose und On-Board-Measurement
  24. Analysis of Kinetic Dynamics of the Multipole Resonance Probe
  25. Internal reference price response across store formats
  26. oREV: An item response theory-based open receptive vocabulary task for 3- to 8-year-old children
  27. Development perspectives for the application of autonomous, unmanned aerial systems (UASs) in wildlife conservation