Framing the relationship between justice and ecosystem services: A systematic review

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Framing the relationship between justice and ecosystem services: A systematic review. / Locatelli, Bruno; Benra, Felipe; Geneletti, Davide et al.
in: Ecosystem Services, Jahrgang 74, 101755, 08.2025.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Locatelli, B., Benra, F., Geneletti, D., Loft, L., Loos, J., Schröter, B., Winkler, K., & Zoderer, B. M. (2025). Framing the relationship between justice and ecosystem services: A systematic review. Ecosystem Services, 74, Artikel 101755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101755

Vancouver

Locatelli B, Benra F, Geneletti D, Loft L, Loos J, Schröter B et al. Framing the relationship between justice and ecosystem services: A systematic review. Ecosystem Services. 2025 Aug;74:101755. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101755

Bibtex

@article{6bc908c786ba4b82bc10b6567100b569,
title = "Framing the relationship between justice and ecosystem services: A systematic review",
abstract = "Ecosystem services (ES) are integral to environmental justice, in particular because they unevenly contribute to the well-being of different communities. Effective ES management and governance can promote equitable access and ensure that marginalized groups are not excluded from ES benefits, while recognizing the interests of multiple stakeholders and fostering fair decision making. Although environmental justice is a multifaceted concept that encompasses distributive, procedural, and recognition dimensions, most of the research on justice in ES has focused primarily on distributional aspects. Recent reviews indicate a growing interest in integrating environmental justice concerns with ES, but also highlight gaps in understanding how the relationship between justice and ES is framed and studied in different contexts. We conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature to identify the predominant framings of the relationship between ES and justice. Through a qualitative and quantitative analysis of 217 articles, examined from an environmental justice perspective, we identified five distinct framings, i.e. particular conceptualizations of the relationship between ES and justice that ultimately influence what (in)justices can be rendered visible or invisible. Each of the framings {\textquoteleft}Space{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}Access{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}Values{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}PES{\textquoteright} (Payment for ES), and {\textquoteleft}Management{\textquoteright} is associated with specific research questions and methods on ES, as well as specific perspectives and findings on justice. The plurality of framings identified in this review underscores the conceptual complexity of environmental justice and highlights the importance of engaging with diverse perspectives when addressing justice in relation to ES.",
keywords = "Ecosystems Research, Justice, Equity, Fairness, Framing, Systematic review",
author = "Bruno Locatelli and Felipe Benra and Davide Geneletti and Lasse Loft and Jacqueline Loos and Barbara Schr{\"o}ter and Klara Winkler and Zoderer, {Brenda Maria}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 The Author(s)",
year = "2025",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101755",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Framing the relationship between justice and ecosystem services

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Locatelli, Bruno

AU - Benra, Felipe

AU - Geneletti, Davide

AU - Loft, Lasse

AU - Loos, Jacqueline

AU - Schröter, Barbara

AU - Winkler, Klara

AU - Zoderer, Brenda Maria

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)

PY - 2025/8

Y1 - 2025/8

N2 - Ecosystem services (ES) are integral to environmental justice, in particular because they unevenly contribute to the well-being of different communities. Effective ES management and governance can promote equitable access and ensure that marginalized groups are not excluded from ES benefits, while recognizing the interests of multiple stakeholders and fostering fair decision making. Although environmental justice is a multifaceted concept that encompasses distributive, procedural, and recognition dimensions, most of the research on justice in ES has focused primarily on distributional aspects. Recent reviews indicate a growing interest in integrating environmental justice concerns with ES, but also highlight gaps in understanding how the relationship between justice and ES is framed and studied in different contexts. We conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature to identify the predominant framings of the relationship between ES and justice. Through a qualitative and quantitative analysis of 217 articles, examined from an environmental justice perspective, we identified five distinct framings, i.e. particular conceptualizations of the relationship between ES and justice that ultimately influence what (in)justices can be rendered visible or invisible. Each of the framings ‘Space’, ‘Access’, ‘Values’, ‘PES’ (Payment for ES), and ‘Management’ is associated with specific research questions and methods on ES, as well as specific perspectives and findings on justice. The plurality of framings identified in this review underscores the conceptual complexity of environmental justice and highlights the importance of engaging with diverse perspectives when addressing justice in relation to ES.

AB - Ecosystem services (ES) are integral to environmental justice, in particular because they unevenly contribute to the well-being of different communities. Effective ES management and governance can promote equitable access and ensure that marginalized groups are not excluded from ES benefits, while recognizing the interests of multiple stakeholders and fostering fair decision making. Although environmental justice is a multifaceted concept that encompasses distributive, procedural, and recognition dimensions, most of the research on justice in ES has focused primarily on distributional aspects. Recent reviews indicate a growing interest in integrating environmental justice concerns with ES, but also highlight gaps in understanding how the relationship between justice and ES is framed and studied in different contexts. We conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature to identify the predominant framings of the relationship between ES and justice. Through a qualitative and quantitative analysis of 217 articles, examined from an environmental justice perspective, we identified five distinct framings, i.e. particular conceptualizations of the relationship between ES and justice that ultimately influence what (in)justices can be rendered visible or invisible. Each of the framings ‘Space’, ‘Access’, ‘Values’, ‘PES’ (Payment for ES), and ‘Management’ is associated with specific research questions and methods on ES, as well as specific perspectives and findings on justice. The plurality of framings identified in this review underscores the conceptual complexity of environmental justice and highlights the importance of engaging with diverse perspectives when addressing justice in relation to ES.

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Justice

KW - Equity

KW - Fairness

KW - Framing

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105010919634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101755

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101755

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:105010919634

VL - 74

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

M1 - 101755

ER -

DOI