Does attention speed up processing? Decreases and increases of processing rates in visual prior entry

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Does attention speed up processing? Decreases and increases of processing rates in visual prior entry. / Tünnermann, Jan; Petersen, Anders; Scharlau, Ingrid.
in: Journal of Vision, Jahrgang 15, Nr. 3, 1, 01.01.2015, S. 1-27.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{d376c41624c148ee9d9a127262827d26,
title = "Does attention speed up processing?: Decreases and increases of processing rates in visual prior entry",
abstract = "Selective visual attention improves performance in many tasks. Among others, it leads to “prior entry”—earlier perception of an attended compared to an unattended stimulus. Whether this phenomenon is purely based on an increase of the processing rate of the attended stimulus or if a decrease in the processing rate of the unattended stimulus also contributes to the effect is, up to now, unanswered. Here we describe a novel approach to this question based on Bundesen's Theory of Visual Attention, which we use to overcome the limitations of earlier prior-entry assessment with temporal order judgments (TOJs) that only allow relative statements regarding the processing speed of attended and unattended stimuli. Prevalent models of prior entry in TOJs either indirectly predict a pure acceleration or cannot model the difference between acceleration and deceleration. In a paradigm that combines a letter-identification task with TOJs, we show that indeed acceleration of the attended and deceleration of the unattended stimuli conjointly cause prior entry.",
keywords = "Psychology, Cueing, Prior entry, TOJ, TVA, Visual attention",
author = "Jan T{\"u}nnermann and Anders Petersen and Ingrid Scharlau",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015 ARVO.",
year = "2015",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1167/15.3.1",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "1--27",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does attention speed up processing?

T2 - Decreases and increases of processing rates in visual prior entry

AU - Tünnermann, Jan

AU - Petersen, Anders

AU - Scharlau, Ingrid

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2015 ARVO.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Selective visual attention improves performance in many tasks. Among others, it leads to “prior entry”—earlier perception of an attended compared to an unattended stimulus. Whether this phenomenon is purely based on an increase of the processing rate of the attended stimulus or if a decrease in the processing rate of the unattended stimulus also contributes to the effect is, up to now, unanswered. Here we describe a novel approach to this question based on Bundesen's Theory of Visual Attention, which we use to overcome the limitations of earlier prior-entry assessment with temporal order judgments (TOJs) that only allow relative statements regarding the processing speed of attended and unattended stimuli. Prevalent models of prior entry in TOJs either indirectly predict a pure acceleration or cannot model the difference between acceleration and deceleration. In a paradigm that combines a letter-identification task with TOJs, we show that indeed acceleration of the attended and deceleration of the unattended stimuli conjointly cause prior entry.

AB - Selective visual attention improves performance in many tasks. Among others, it leads to “prior entry”—earlier perception of an attended compared to an unattended stimulus. Whether this phenomenon is purely based on an increase of the processing rate of the attended stimulus or if a decrease in the processing rate of the unattended stimulus also contributes to the effect is, up to now, unanswered. Here we describe a novel approach to this question based on Bundesen's Theory of Visual Attention, which we use to overcome the limitations of earlier prior-entry assessment with temporal order judgments (TOJs) that only allow relative statements regarding the processing speed of attended and unattended stimuli. Prevalent models of prior entry in TOJs either indirectly predict a pure acceleration or cannot model the difference between acceleration and deceleration. In a paradigm that combines a letter-identification task with TOJs, we show that indeed acceleration of the attended and deceleration of the unattended stimuli conjointly cause prior entry.

KW - Psychology

KW - Cueing

KW - Prior entry

KW - TOJ

KW - TVA

KW - Visual attention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924805291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/15.3.1

DO - 10.1167/15.3.1

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 25733608

VL - 15

SP - 1

EP - 27

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 3

M1 - 1

ER -

Dokumente

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Regional powers and the politics of scale
  2. Empirische Methoden in der Sprachdidaktik
  3. Regierungszentralen und Policy-Integration
  4. The speech act of ‘offers’ in Irish English
  5. Fremdsprachliche Textkompetenz entwickeln
  6. Die Kommune als Ort lebendiger Demokratie
  7. Ein paar Walzerschritte zu Haffners Ehren
  8. Ausstellungskatalog: Homestory Deutschland
  9. ›Sampling‹ als kulturelle Praxis des HipHop
  10. Gerechter Frieden als Orientierungswissen
  11. Klassentestheft Teil 1 (10 Ex.) - 2. Schuljahr
  12. Überschriften – der Anfang ist das A und O?!
  13. Plea Bargaining/Settlement of Cartel Cases
  14. Heritage, culture and artistic reciprocity
  15. Psychological interventions for psychosis
  16. In search of maturity models in agritechs
  17. Schnittstellen-Probleme im Musikunterricht
  18. Operations Systems of Container Terminals
  19. Professionalisierung und Professionalität
  20. Klassentestheft Teil 2 (10 Ex.) - 2. Schuljahr
  21. Klassentestheft Teil 1 (10 Ex.) - 1. Schuljahr
  22. Musical New Buildings of the 21st Century
  23. Societal Culture and Leadership in Germany
  24. Naturschutzansprüche und ihre Durchsetzung
  25. Fortgeschrittenenklausur - Strafrecht: BT II
  26. Äquivalente der causa beim Vertragsschluss.
  27. A personality approach to entrepreneurship
  28. Pasture landscapes and nature conservation
  29. Digital Seriality as Structure and Process
  30. Fahrstuhl: Vom Fremdkörper zum Gebäudekern
  31. Kulturelles Erbe - Ausstieg aus der Moderne?
  32. Unterstützung des Lesens im Fachunterricht
  33. Bildung und Beteiligung oder doch Teilhabe?
  34. Friedenswege in zeitlicher Diskontintuität
  35. Partizipation am Beispiel von Preisbildung
  36. Polar Coordinates and Interactive Learning
  37. Ausländer in südafrikanischen (Innen-)Städten
  38. Gerhard Rühm oder: Vom Eigensinn der Medien
  39. Belastung und Beanspruchung im Lehrerberuf
  40. Belastung und Beanspruchung im Lehrerberuf
  41. Fashioning a Proper Institutional Position
  42. Quel est le role de l’initiative personnelle
  43. Das Leuphana College und seine Bildungsidee
  44. Verlust der Beamtenrechte durch Strafurteil
  45. Gesellschaftliches Lernen und Partizipation