Do Minority Cabinets Govern More Flexibly and Inclusively? Evidence from Germany

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Do Minority Cabinets Govern More Flexibly and Inclusively? Evidence from Germany. / Ganghof, Steffen; Eppner, Sebastian; Stecker, Christian et al.
in: German Politics, Jahrgang 28, Nr. 4, 02.10.2019, S. 541-561.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Ganghof S, Eppner S, Stecker C, Heeß K, Schukraft S. Do Minority Cabinets Govern More Flexibly and Inclusively? Evidence from Germany. German Politics. 2019 Okt 2;28(4):541-561. Epub 2019 Jul 4. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2019.1635120

Bibtex

@article{457923b0c2d2415588ec33cbee661e9f,
title = "Do Minority Cabinets Govern More Flexibly and Inclusively?: Evidence from Germany",
abstract = "A widespread view in political science is that minority cabinets govern more flexibly and inclusively, more in line with a median-oriented and 'consensual' vision of democracy. Yet there is only little empirical evidence for it. We study legislative coalition-building in the German state of North-Rhine-Westphalia, which was ruled by a minority government between 2010 and 2012. We compare the inclusiveness of legislative coalitions under minority and majority cabinets, based on 1028 laws passed in the 1985–2017 period, and analyze in detail the flexibility of legislative coalition formation under the minority government. Both quantitative analyses are complemented with brief case studies of specific legislation. We find, first, that the minority cabinet did not rule more inclusively. Second, the minority cabinet{\textquoteright}s legislative flexibility was fairly limited; to the extent that it existed, it follows a pattern that cannot be explained on the basis of the standard spatial model with policy-seeking parties.",
keywords = "Politics",
author = "Steffen Ganghof and Sebastian Eppner and Christian Stecker and Katja Hee{\ss} and Stefan Schukraft",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019, {\textcopyright} 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/09644008.2019.1635120",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "541--561",
journal = "German Politics",
issn = "0964-4008",
publisher = "Frank Cass Publishers",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Minority Cabinets Govern More Flexibly and Inclusively?

T2 - Evidence from Germany

AU - Ganghof, Steffen

AU - Eppner, Sebastian

AU - Stecker, Christian

AU - Heeß, Katja

AU - Schukraft, Stefan

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019, © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2019/10/2

Y1 - 2019/10/2

N2 - A widespread view in political science is that minority cabinets govern more flexibly and inclusively, more in line with a median-oriented and 'consensual' vision of democracy. Yet there is only little empirical evidence for it. We study legislative coalition-building in the German state of North-Rhine-Westphalia, which was ruled by a minority government between 2010 and 2012. We compare the inclusiveness of legislative coalitions under minority and majority cabinets, based on 1028 laws passed in the 1985–2017 period, and analyze in detail the flexibility of legislative coalition formation under the minority government. Both quantitative analyses are complemented with brief case studies of specific legislation. We find, first, that the minority cabinet did not rule more inclusively. Second, the minority cabinet’s legislative flexibility was fairly limited; to the extent that it existed, it follows a pattern that cannot be explained on the basis of the standard spatial model with policy-seeking parties.

AB - A widespread view in political science is that minority cabinets govern more flexibly and inclusively, more in line with a median-oriented and 'consensual' vision of democracy. Yet there is only little empirical evidence for it. We study legislative coalition-building in the German state of North-Rhine-Westphalia, which was ruled by a minority government between 2010 and 2012. We compare the inclusiveness of legislative coalitions under minority and majority cabinets, based on 1028 laws passed in the 1985–2017 period, and analyze in detail the flexibility of legislative coalition formation under the minority government. Both quantitative analyses are complemented with brief case studies of specific legislation. We find, first, that the minority cabinet did not rule more inclusively. Second, the minority cabinet’s legislative flexibility was fairly limited; to the extent that it existed, it follows a pattern that cannot be explained on the basis of the standard spatial model with policy-seeking parties.

KW - Politics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068590466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09644008.2019.1635120

DO - 10.1080/09644008.2019.1635120

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 28

SP - 541

EP - 561

JO - German Politics

JF - German Politics

SN - 0964-4008

IS - 4

ER -

Dokumente

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. At the periphery of the periphery
  2. The exporter productivity premium along the productivity distribution
  3. Autonomie der Migration
  4. Lesesozialisation
  5. Between Fostering and Outsourcing Educational Justice: The EU-Turkey Statement and its Impacts on the Education of "Refugee Students" in Turkey
  6. Ideological Construction of Deviance in Street Children’s Discourse in Southwestern Nigeria
  7. Carbon Management Accounting
  8. Jenseits des Werkzeugs
  9. § 60 Republik Korea (Südkorea)
  10. Systematic student-driven literature reviews in sustainability science
  11. Ausländer in südafrikanischen (Innen-)Städten
  12. Ein optimales Zeitfenster für den Fortschritt?
  13. A Sociocognitive Interpretation of Organizational Downsizing
  14. Unterwegssein und die Fraglichkeit des Bleibens
  15. Correction to
  16. Vom Tableau zur entfesselten Kamera
  17. Traumziel Nachhaltigkeit
  18. Two Decades of Sustainability Management Tools for SMEs
  19. Requirements engineering for an industrial symbiosis tool for industrial parks covering system analysis, transformation simulation and goal setting
  20. Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung von Freude am Schulsport im Jugendalter (FEFS-J)
  21. Formen des Biodiversitätsmanagements
  22. Schlemmer, Oskar
  23. Migration, Legalität und Kriminalität
  24. Training participation of an aging workforce in an internal labor market
  25. Kinder in der Jugendhilfe
  26. Exports and Productivity
  27. What predicts the alleviation of Covid-related future anxiety in schoolchildren 6 to 9 months into the pandemic?
  28. Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement in der öffentlichen Verwaltung