Der Tod Christi als Sühnopfer: Probleme und gegenwärtige Antworten der Forschung

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

Der Tod Christi als Sühnopfer: Probleme und gegenwärtige Antworten der Forschung. / Mühling, Markus.
in: Kerygma und Dogma, Jahrgang 62, Nr. 2, 09.06.2016, S. 135–159.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{8045529f387d4c1588a39d308f622352,
title = "Der Tod Christi als S{\"u}hnopfer: Probleme und gegenw{\"a}rtige Antworten der Forschung",
abstract = "Beginning with the observation that the salvific nature of Jesus' death is frequently rejected as a starting point in theology, this article (1) recalls some often forgotten analytical distinctions and (2) analyses the contemporary soteriological positions of Rene Girard, Sarah Coakley, Marit Trelstad, Jan-Olav Henriksen, and the author himself The concluding constructive section sketches a soteriological position based on a narrative ontology in which Jesus' death is embedded in broader stories of the Son and Trinitarian salvation history, which at the same time also form the canon of human becoming.",
keywords = "Theologie, Philosophie, Kulturwissenschaften allg.",
author = "Markus M{\"u}hling",
year = "2016",
month = jun,
day = "9",
doi = "10.13109/kedo.2016.62.2.135",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "62",
pages = "135–159",
journal = "Kerygma und Dogma",
issn = "0023-0707",
publisher = "Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht GmbH and Co. KG",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Der Tod Christi als Sühnopfer

T2 - Probleme und gegenwärtige Antworten der Forschung

AU - Mühling, Markus

PY - 2016/6/9

Y1 - 2016/6/9

N2 - Beginning with the observation that the salvific nature of Jesus' death is frequently rejected as a starting point in theology, this article (1) recalls some often forgotten analytical distinctions and (2) analyses the contemporary soteriological positions of Rene Girard, Sarah Coakley, Marit Trelstad, Jan-Olav Henriksen, and the author himself The concluding constructive section sketches a soteriological position based on a narrative ontology in which Jesus' death is embedded in broader stories of the Son and Trinitarian salvation history, which at the same time also form the canon of human becoming.

AB - Beginning with the observation that the salvific nature of Jesus' death is frequently rejected as a starting point in theology, this article (1) recalls some often forgotten analytical distinctions and (2) analyses the contemporary soteriological positions of Rene Girard, Sarah Coakley, Marit Trelstad, Jan-Olav Henriksen, and the author himself The concluding constructive section sketches a soteriological position based on a narrative ontology in which Jesus' death is embedded in broader stories of the Son and Trinitarian salvation history, which at the same time also form the canon of human becoming.

KW - Theologie

KW - Philosophie

KW - Kulturwissenschaften allg.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85000885338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.13109/kedo.2016.62.2.135

DO - 10.13109/kedo.2016.62.2.135

M3 - Übersichtsarbeiten

VL - 62

SP - 135

EP - 159

JO - Kerygma und Dogma

JF - Kerygma und Dogma

SN - 0023-0707

IS - 2

ER -

DOI