Convergence or mediation? Experts of vulnerability and the vulnerability of experts' discourses on nanotechnologies: a case study

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{1a47445b02e04efcb94f01790913553e,
title = "Convergence or mediation? Experts of vulnerability and the vulnerability of experts' discourses on nanotechnologies: a case study",
abstract = "Since 2004, risk in the context of nanotechnologies has been criticized as being too abstract and an all-inclusive category. Moreover, the concept of risk is not precise enough to describe the potential issues related to the development of nanotechnologies. Instead, experts on technological development emphasize risk communication. In the field of nanotechnologies, this term was redefined in February 2005 in relation to the question of societal acceptance of nanotechnologies. Risk communication is about gaining stakeholder acceptance of policy decisions, whilst the public and stakeholders are encouraged to participate actively in the communication process through public consultations or hearings. Thus, on the one hand, the category of risk has been pragmatically nuanced to better highlight the vulnerability of the communication of nanotechnologies. On the other hand, this vulnerable communication is not the result of a deficit of information. It is based on the idea of participation, where vulnerability hinges on the social groups specialized in the design, application and diffusion of nanotechnologies within society. How is such participation possible, and what does it entail? We develop this question in the framework of a comparative survey of experts in the development of nanotechnologies in Grenoble (France) and Hamburg (Germany).",
keywords = "Economics, Civil society, Convergence, Experts, Externalities, Mediation, Nanotechnologies, Region, Risk",
author = "Ingrid Ott and Christian Papilloud",
year = "2008",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1080/13511610802002221",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "41--64",
journal = "Innovation - The European Journal of Social Science Research",
issn = "1351-1610",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Convergence or mediation? Experts of vulnerability and the vulnerability of experts' discourses on nanotechnologies

T2 - a case study

AU - Ott, Ingrid

AU - Papilloud, Christian

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - Since 2004, risk in the context of nanotechnologies has been criticized as being too abstract and an all-inclusive category. Moreover, the concept of risk is not precise enough to describe the potential issues related to the development of nanotechnologies. Instead, experts on technological development emphasize risk communication. In the field of nanotechnologies, this term was redefined in February 2005 in relation to the question of societal acceptance of nanotechnologies. Risk communication is about gaining stakeholder acceptance of policy decisions, whilst the public and stakeholders are encouraged to participate actively in the communication process through public consultations or hearings. Thus, on the one hand, the category of risk has been pragmatically nuanced to better highlight the vulnerability of the communication of nanotechnologies. On the other hand, this vulnerable communication is not the result of a deficit of information. It is based on the idea of participation, where vulnerability hinges on the social groups specialized in the design, application and diffusion of nanotechnologies within society. How is such participation possible, and what does it entail? We develop this question in the framework of a comparative survey of experts in the development of nanotechnologies in Grenoble (France) and Hamburg (Germany).

AB - Since 2004, risk in the context of nanotechnologies has been criticized as being too abstract and an all-inclusive category. Moreover, the concept of risk is not precise enough to describe the potential issues related to the development of nanotechnologies. Instead, experts on technological development emphasize risk communication. In the field of nanotechnologies, this term was redefined in February 2005 in relation to the question of societal acceptance of nanotechnologies. Risk communication is about gaining stakeholder acceptance of policy decisions, whilst the public and stakeholders are encouraged to participate actively in the communication process through public consultations or hearings. Thus, on the one hand, the category of risk has been pragmatically nuanced to better highlight the vulnerability of the communication of nanotechnologies. On the other hand, this vulnerable communication is not the result of a deficit of information. It is based on the idea of participation, where vulnerability hinges on the social groups specialized in the design, application and diffusion of nanotechnologies within society. How is such participation possible, and what does it entail? We develop this question in the framework of a comparative survey of experts in the development of nanotechnologies in Grenoble (France) and Hamburg (Germany).

KW - Economics

KW - Civil society

KW - Convergence

KW - Experts

KW - Externalities

KW - Mediation

KW - Nanotechnologies

KW - Region

KW - Risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42649134518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13511610802002221

DO - 10.1080/13511610802002221

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 21

SP - 41

EP - 64

JO - Innovation - The European Journal of Social Science Research

JF - Innovation - The European Journal of Social Science Research

SN - 1351-1610

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. How should we fund open access monographs and what do you think is the most likely way that funding will happen?
  2. Thermodynamic models
  3. Publicum
  4. Wer wird subventioniert?
  5. Combination of different liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry technologies for the identification of transformation products of rhodamine B in groundwater
  6. Coming to work while sick
  7. Europe's twenties: a study using the WIATEC model
  8. Deconstructing a 2-year long transdisciplinary sustainability project in Northern universities
  9. Comparison of PSA-specific CD8+ CTL responses and antitumor immunity generated by plasmid DNA vaccines encoding PSA-HSP chimeric proteins
  10. The Effect of Corporate Environmental Strategy Choice and Environmental Performance on Competitiveness and Economic Performance
  11. Digital Transformation of Interdisciplinary Engineering Education
  12. The moderating role of experience on the relationship between trust and performance of cooperating SMEs in transformation economies
  13. Wavelet characterizations for anisotropic Besov spaces with 0 p 1
  14. Über Dieter Roth
  15. Zeit
  16. Almost there: On the importance of a comprehensive entrepreneurial ecosystem for developing sustainable urban food forest enterprises
  17. Black visual culture
  18. Wirtschaft neu lehren – eine Einleitung
  19. Installation als Verfahren
  20. Trügerische Sicherheit
  21. The Collaborative Production of Meaningful Measure(ment)s
  22. Psychological interventions to prevent the onset of major depression in adults
  23. Neo-orthodoxe und soziokulturelle Sozialökologie: Ein Beitrag zur Integrationsdebatte