Conventional teaching vs. e-learning: A case study of German undergraduate biology students
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Education and Information Technologies, 24.12.2024.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Conventional teaching vs. e-learning
T2 - A case study of German undergraduate biology students
AU - Bauermeister, Tim
AU - Janßen, Nina
AU - Engler, John Oliver
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/12/24
Y1 - 2024/12/24
N2 - Digital learning environments such as virtual laboratories have been proposed to augment or even replace conventional forms of teaching in recent years. While there is some evidence on comparable learning outcomes between real and virtual labs, empirical evidence on the effectiveness of virtual labs as compared to conventional face-to-face teaching is largely lacking. Here, we used the virtual lab platform Labster in a first-year undergraduate course on general biology to evaluate its effectiveness against conventional teaching using a repeated measure randomized control trial (treatment group n = 131, control group n = 108). We find no evidence for a difference in terms of learning success between treatment and control groups, consistent with empirical studies on real vs. virtual labs. However, Labster exposure led to a more positive attitude towards e-learning, and a positive user experience was the strongest predictor of individual learning success, highlighting the importance of engagement in digital learning environments.
AB - Digital learning environments such as virtual laboratories have been proposed to augment or even replace conventional forms of teaching in recent years. While there is some evidence on comparable learning outcomes between real and virtual labs, empirical evidence on the effectiveness of virtual labs as compared to conventional face-to-face teaching is largely lacking. Here, we used the virtual lab platform Labster in a first-year undergraduate course on general biology to evaluate its effectiveness against conventional teaching using a repeated measure randomized control trial (treatment group n = 131, control group n = 108). We find no evidence for a difference in terms of learning success between treatment and control groups, consistent with empirical studies on real vs. virtual labs. However, Labster exposure led to a more positive attitude towards e-learning, and a positive user experience was the strongest predictor of individual learning success, highlighting the importance of engagement in digital learning environments.
KW - Attitudes towards e-learning
KW - Learning outcomes comparison
KW - Undergraduate biology education
KW - User experience in digital learning
KW - Virtual laboratories
KW - Didactics of sciences education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85212970025&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10639-024-13261-2
DO - 10.1007/s10639-024-13261-2
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85212970025
JO - Education and Information Technologies
JF - Education and Information Technologies
SN - 1360-2357
ER -