Calibration of a simple method for determining ammonia volatilization in the field - Comparative measurements in Henan Province, China
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, Jahrgang 74, Nr. 3, 01.03.2006, S. 259-273.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Calibration of a simple method for determining ammonia volatilization in the field - Comparative measurements in Henan Province, China
AU - Pacholski, A.
AU - Cai, Gui-Xin
AU - Nieder, Rolf
AU - Richter, Julia
AU - Fan, X.-H.
AU - Zhu, Z.
AU - Roelcke, Marco
N1 - Funding Information: This study was supported by the Deutsche For-schungsgemeinschaft (DFG Ri 269/42, Ni 311/3), the Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ VN 810 12 840) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC). The authors particularly like to thank Dr. Hong Ding, Dr. Shunyao Zhuang and Mr. Yu Peng for their help and support during the measurements and Mr. Qiao Jiang, the manager of Fengqiu Experimental Station.
PY - 2006/3/1
Y1 - 2006/3/1
N2 - The determination of ammonia volatilization with sufficient spatial and temporal resolution requires a simple and versatile in situ measurement technique, particularly in developing countries. Therefore, a simple chamber method for determining ammonia (NH3) volatilization in the field (Dräger-Tube Method; DTM) was calibrated by comparison with simultaneous measurements with a micrometeorological Integrated Horizontal Flux (IHF) method. Five field experiments were conducted following urea fertilization on summer maize and winter wheat plots (1998-1999) at Fengqiu Experimental Station, Central China. The simplicity of the chamber method allowed for measurements to be carried out by trained farmers. The measurements with both methods yielded very similar patterns of NH3 fluxes and similar differences between fertilization treatments. Cumulative NH3 losses determined by the IHF method ranged from 14.6 to 47.9% and from 0.6 to 17.9% of urea-N applied for surface broadcast and incorporated fertilization, respectively. As expected, cumulated NH3 losses were underestimated by the DTM as compared to the IHF by about one order of magnitude. A calibration equation was calculated by multiple linear regression which included NH3 flux data as well as temperature and wind speed values. The calibration model yielded a modelling efficiency c 2 of 0.86 resulting in an average estimation error of cumulative NH3 losses of 17%. The equation was validated by comparison of IHF measurements and DTM fluxes not considered in the derivation of the calibration formula. The calibration approach can be used under similar meteorological and field conditions irrespective of the soil characteristics or type of N fertilizer applied. © Springer 2006.
AB - The determination of ammonia volatilization with sufficient spatial and temporal resolution requires a simple and versatile in situ measurement technique, particularly in developing countries. Therefore, a simple chamber method for determining ammonia (NH3) volatilization in the field (Dräger-Tube Method; DTM) was calibrated by comparison with simultaneous measurements with a micrometeorological Integrated Horizontal Flux (IHF) method. Five field experiments were conducted following urea fertilization on summer maize and winter wheat plots (1998-1999) at Fengqiu Experimental Station, Central China. The simplicity of the chamber method allowed for measurements to be carried out by trained farmers. The measurements with both methods yielded very similar patterns of NH3 fluxes and similar differences between fertilization treatments. Cumulative NH3 losses determined by the IHF method ranged from 14.6 to 47.9% and from 0.6 to 17.9% of urea-N applied for surface broadcast and incorporated fertilization, respectively. As expected, cumulated NH3 losses were underestimated by the DTM as compared to the IHF by about one order of magnitude. A calibration equation was calculated by multiple linear regression which included NH3 flux data as well as temperature and wind speed values. The calibration model yielded a modelling efficiency c 2 of 0.86 resulting in an average estimation error of cumulative NH3 losses of 17%. The equation was validated by comparison of IHF measurements and DTM fluxes not considered in the derivation of the calibration formula. The calibration approach can be used under similar meteorological and field conditions irrespective of the soil characteristics or type of N fertilizer applied. © Springer 2006.
KW - Management studies
KW - Ammonia partial pressure
KW - Chamber method
KW - Integrated Horizontal Flux method
KW - Nitrogen loss
KW - Urea
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747062180&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/0ecf2df3-07cd-3dc6-83d1-d72a86a60fde/
U2 - 10.1007/s10705-006-9003-4
DO - 10.1007/s10705-006-9003-4
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:33747062180
VL - 74
SP - 259
EP - 273
JO - Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
JF - Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
SN - 1385-1314
IS - 3
ER -