Biological invasions: a global assessment of geographic distributions, long-term trends, and data gaps

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Biological invasions: a global assessment of geographic distributions, long-term trends, and data gaps. / Author collaboration of "Biological invasions: a global assessment of geographic distributions, long-term trends, and data gaps".
in: Biological Reviews, 2025.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Author collaboration of "Biological invasions: a global assessment of geographic distributions, long-term trends, and data gaps" 2025, 'Biological invasions: a global assessment of geographic distributions, long-term trends, and data gaps', Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70058

APA

Author collaboration of "Biological invasions: a global assessment of geographic distributions, long-term trends, and data gaps" (im Druck). Biological invasions: a global assessment of geographic distributions, long-term trends, and data gaps. Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70058

Vancouver

Author collaboration of "Biological invasions: a global assessment of geographic distributions, long-term trends, and data gaps". Biological invasions: a global assessment of geographic distributions, long-term trends, and data gaps. Biological Reviews. 2025. doi: 10.1111/brv.70058

Bibtex

@article{f5dbfb975fcf4265807e3d1276cccded,
title = "Biological invasions: a global assessment of geographic distributions, long-term trends, and data gaps",
abstract = "Biological invasions are one of the major drivers of biodiversity decline and have been shown to have far-reaching consequences for society and the economy. Preventing the introduction and spread of alien species represents the most effective solution to reducing their impacts on nature and human well-being. However, implementing effective solutions requires a good understanding of where the species are established and how biological invasions develop over time. Knowledge of the status and trends of biological invasions is thus key for guiding research efforts, informing stakeholders and policymakers, for targeted management efforts, and preparing for the future. However, information about the status and trends of alien species is scattered, patchy, and highly incomplete, making it difficult to assess. Published reports for individual regions and taxonomic groups are available, but large-scale overviews are scarce. A global assessment therefore requires a review of available knowledge with careful consideration of sampling and reporting biases. This paper provides a comprehensive global assessment of the status and trends of alien species for major taxonomic groups [Bacteria, Protozoa, Stramenopila, Alveolata, and Rhizaria (SAR), fungi, plants, and animals] for Intergovernmental Panel of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) regions. The review provides irrefutable evidence that alien species have been introduced to all regions worldwide including Antarctica and have spread to even the most remote islands. The numbers of alien species are increasing within all taxa and across all regions, and are often even accelerating. Large knowledge gaps exist, particularly for taxonomic groups other than vascular plants and vertebrates, for regions in Africa and Central Asia, and for aquatic realms. In fact, for inconspicuous species, such as Bacteria, Protozoa, and to some degree SAR and fungi, we found records for very few species and regions. Observed status and trends are thus highly influenced by research effort. More generally, it is likely that all lists for alien species of any taxonomic group and region are incomplete. The reported species numbers therefore represent minima, and we can expect additions to all lists in the near future. We identified six key challenges which need to be addressed to reduce knowledge gaps and to improve our ability to assess trends and status of biological invasions.",
keywords = "alien, biogeography, future projections, invasive species, IPBES, knowledge gaps, Neobiota, non-native, time series, worldwide, Biology",
author = "{Author collaboration of {"}Biological invasions: a global assessment of geographic distributions, long-term trends, and data gaps{"}} and Hanno Seebens and Meyerson, {Laura A.} and Richardson, {David M.} and Bernd Lenzner and Elena Tricarico and Franck Courchamp and Alla Aleksanyan and Emre Keskin and Hanieh Saeedi and Perpetra Akite and Alexander, {Jake M.} and Bailey, {Sarah A.} and Dino Biancolini and Blackburn, {Tim M.} and Boehmer, {Hans Juergen} and Alejandro Bortolus and Cadotte, {Marc W.} and C{\'e}sar Capinha and Carlton, {James T.} and Crouch, {Jo Anne} and Daehler, {Curtis C.} and Franz Essl and Foxcroft, {Llewellyn C.} and Fridley, {Jason D.} and Nicol Fuentes and Mirijam Gaertner and Bella Galil and Emili Garc{\'i}a-Berthou and Pablo Garc{\'i}a-D{\'i}az and Sylvia Haider and Liam Heneghan and Hughes, {Kevin A.} and Cang Hui and Ekin Kaplan and Liebhold, {Andrew M.} and Chunlong Liu and Elizabete Marchante and H{\'e}lia Marchante and Alicia Marticorena and Minter, {David W.} and Moreno, {Rodrigo A.} and Wolfgang Nentwig and Aidin Niamir and Ana Novoa and Nunes, {Ana L.} and An{\'i}bal Pauchard and Sebataolo Rahlao and Anthony Ricciardi and Russell, {James C.} and Sankaran, {K. V.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 The Author(s). Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society.",
year = "2025",
doi = "10.1111/brv.70058",
language = "English",
journal = "Biological Reviews",
issn = "1464-7931",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biological invasions

T2 - a global assessment of geographic distributions, long-term trends, and data gaps

AU - Author collaboration of "Biological invasions: a global assessment of geographic distributions, long-term trends, and data gaps"

AU - Seebens, Hanno

AU - Meyerson, Laura A.

AU - Richardson, David M.

AU - Lenzner, Bernd

AU - Tricarico, Elena

AU - Courchamp, Franck

AU - Aleksanyan, Alla

AU - Keskin, Emre

AU - Saeedi, Hanieh

AU - Akite, Perpetra

AU - Alexander, Jake M.

AU - Bailey, Sarah A.

AU - Biancolini, Dino

AU - Blackburn, Tim M.

AU - Boehmer, Hans Juergen

AU - Bortolus, Alejandro

AU - Cadotte, Marc W.

AU - Capinha, César

AU - Carlton, James T.

AU - Crouch, Jo Anne

AU - Daehler, Curtis C.

AU - Essl, Franz

AU - Foxcroft, Llewellyn C.

AU - Fridley, Jason D.

AU - Fuentes, Nicol

AU - Gaertner, Mirijam

AU - Galil, Bella

AU - García-Berthou, Emili

AU - García-Díaz, Pablo

AU - Haider, Sylvia

AU - Heneghan, Liam

AU - Hughes, Kevin A.

AU - Hui, Cang

AU - Kaplan, Ekin

AU - Liebhold, Andrew M.

AU - Liu, Chunlong

AU - Marchante, Elizabete

AU - Marchante, Hélia

AU - Marticorena, Alicia

AU - Minter, David W.

AU - Moreno, Rodrigo A.

AU - Nentwig, Wolfgang

AU - Niamir, Aidin

AU - Novoa, Ana

AU - Nunes, Ana L.

AU - Pauchard, Aníbal

AU - Rahlao, Sebataolo

AU - Ricciardi, Anthony

AU - Russell, James C.

AU - Sankaran, K. V.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society.

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - Biological invasions are one of the major drivers of biodiversity decline and have been shown to have far-reaching consequences for society and the economy. Preventing the introduction and spread of alien species represents the most effective solution to reducing their impacts on nature and human well-being. However, implementing effective solutions requires a good understanding of where the species are established and how biological invasions develop over time. Knowledge of the status and trends of biological invasions is thus key for guiding research efforts, informing stakeholders and policymakers, for targeted management efforts, and preparing for the future. However, information about the status and trends of alien species is scattered, patchy, and highly incomplete, making it difficult to assess. Published reports for individual regions and taxonomic groups are available, but large-scale overviews are scarce. A global assessment therefore requires a review of available knowledge with careful consideration of sampling and reporting biases. This paper provides a comprehensive global assessment of the status and trends of alien species for major taxonomic groups [Bacteria, Protozoa, Stramenopila, Alveolata, and Rhizaria (SAR), fungi, plants, and animals] for Intergovernmental Panel of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) regions. The review provides irrefutable evidence that alien species have been introduced to all regions worldwide including Antarctica and have spread to even the most remote islands. The numbers of alien species are increasing within all taxa and across all regions, and are often even accelerating. Large knowledge gaps exist, particularly for taxonomic groups other than vascular plants and vertebrates, for regions in Africa and Central Asia, and for aquatic realms. In fact, for inconspicuous species, such as Bacteria, Protozoa, and to some degree SAR and fungi, we found records for very few species and regions. Observed status and trends are thus highly influenced by research effort. More generally, it is likely that all lists for alien species of any taxonomic group and region are incomplete. The reported species numbers therefore represent minima, and we can expect additions to all lists in the near future. We identified six key challenges which need to be addressed to reduce knowledge gaps and to improve our ability to assess trends and status of biological invasions.

AB - Biological invasions are one of the major drivers of biodiversity decline and have been shown to have far-reaching consequences for society and the economy. Preventing the introduction and spread of alien species represents the most effective solution to reducing their impacts on nature and human well-being. However, implementing effective solutions requires a good understanding of where the species are established and how biological invasions develop over time. Knowledge of the status and trends of biological invasions is thus key for guiding research efforts, informing stakeholders and policymakers, for targeted management efforts, and preparing for the future. However, information about the status and trends of alien species is scattered, patchy, and highly incomplete, making it difficult to assess. Published reports for individual regions and taxonomic groups are available, but large-scale overviews are scarce. A global assessment therefore requires a review of available knowledge with careful consideration of sampling and reporting biases. This paper provides a comprehensive global assessment of the status and trends of alien species for major taxonomic groups [Bacteria, Protozoa, Stramenopila, Alveolata, and Rhizaria (SAR), fungi, plants, and animals] for Intergovernmental Panel of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) regions. The review provides irrefutable evidence that alien species have been introduced to all regions worldwide including Antarctica and have spread to even the most remote islands. The numbers of alien species are increasing within all taxa and across all regions, and are often even accelerating. Large knowledge gaps exist, particularly for taxonomic groups other than vascular plants and vertebrates, for regions in Africa and Central Asia, and for aquatic realms. In fact, for inconspicuous species, such as Bacteria, Protozoa, and to some degree SAR and fungi, we found records for very few species and regions. Observed status and trends are thus highly influenced by research effort. More generally, it is likely that all lists for alien species of any taxonomic group and region are incomplete. The reported species numbers therefore represent minima, and we can expect additions to all lists in the near future. We identified six key challenges which need to be addressed to reduce knowledge gaps and to improve our ability to assess trends and status of biological invasions.

KW - alien

KW - biogeography

KW - future projections

KW - invasive species

KW - IPBES

KW - knowledge gaps

KW - Neobiota

KW - non-native

KW - time series

KW - worldwide

KW - Biology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105013265134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/brv.70058

DO - 10.1111/brv.70058

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:105013265134

JO - Biological Reviews

JF - Biological Reviews

SN - 1464-7931

ER -

DOI