1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publikationen
  5. Activating an Integrative Mindset Improv...
  6. Formate
  7. //

Activating an Integrative Mindset Improves the Subjective Outcomes of Value-Driven Conflicts

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Standard

Activating an Integrative Mindset Improves the Subjective Outcomes of Value-Driven Conflicts. / Schuster, Carolin; Harinck, Fieke; Trötschel, Roman.

in: Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, Jahrgang 16, Nr. 1, 01.02.2023, S. 80-99.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Harvard

Schuster, C, Harinck, F & Trötschel, R 2023, 'Activating an Integrative Mindset Improves the Subjective Outcomes of Value-Driven Conflicts', Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, Jg. 16, Nr. 1, S. 80-99. https://doi.org/10.34891/2022.0544

APA

Schuster, C., Harinck, F., & Trötschel, R. (2023). Activating an Integrative Mindset Improves the Subjective Outcomes of Value-Driven Conflicts. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 16(1), 80-99. https://doi.org/10.34891/2022.0544

Vancouver

Schuster C, Harinck F, Trötschel R. Activating an Integrative Mindset Improves the Subjective Outcomes of Value-Driven Conflicts. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research. 2023 Feb 1;16(1):80-99. doi: 10.34891/2022.0544

Bibtex

@article{f488d7d3c6f2441e9530c8cc21f734c6,
title = "Activating an Integrative Mindset Improves the Subjective Outcomes of Value-Driven Conflicts",
abstract = "The present study tests the effectiveness of a mindset intervention for negotiators in value-driven conflicts. We hypothesize that this intervention fosters integrative negotiation behaviors and subjective outcomes. In an experimental 2 (motive: value vs. utility) by 2 (intervention: mindset vs. control) design, 253 participants negotiated online with a simulated counterpart. In contrast to predictions, the mindset led to more integrative trade-offs among utility-driven but not value-driven negotiators. However, the results support the effectiveness of the mindset intervention to improve subjective outcomes of value-driven negotiators. Without the intervention, they perceive the negotiation outcome as significantly less positive than utility-driven negotiators with the same objective outcome. In addition, explorative analyses show that without the mindset intervention, value-driven negotiators respect their counterpart less as a person of equal worth than utility-driven negotiators; this is no longer the case after activating the integrative mindset. The implications of these findings for resolving value conflicts and improving tolerance between parties with different value priorities are discussed.",
keywords = "Psychology, Negotiation",
author = "Carolin Schuster and Fieke Harinck and Roman Tr{\"o}tschel",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 International Association for Conflict Management.",
year = "2023",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.34891/2022.0544",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "80--99",
journal = "Negotiation and Conflict Management Research",
issn = "1750-4708",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Activating an Integrative Mindset Improves the Subjective Outcomes of Value-Driven Conflicts

AU - Schuster, Carolin

AU - Harinck, Fieke

AU - Trötschel, Roman

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 International Association for Conflict Management.

PY - 2023/2/1

Y1 - 2023/2/1

N2 - The present study tests the effectiveness of a mindset intervention for negotiators in value-driven conflicts. We hypothesize that this intervention fosters integrative negotiation behaviors and subjective outcomes. In an experimental 2 (motive: value vs. utility) by 2 (intervention: mindset vs. control) design, 253 participants negotiated online with a simulated counterpart. In contrast to predictions, the mindset led to more integrative trade-offs among utility-driven but not value-driven negotiators. However, the results support the effectiveness of the mindset intervention to improve subjective outcomes of value-driven negotiators. Without the intervention, they perceive the negotiation outcome as significantly less positive than utility-driven negotiators with the same objective outcome. In addition, explorative analyses show that without the mindset intervention, value-driven negotiators respect their counterpart less as a person of equal worth than utility-driven negotiators; this is no longer the case after activating the integrative mindset. The implications of these findings for resolving value conflicts and improving tolerance between parties with different value priorities are discussed.

AB - The present study tests the effectiveness of a mindset intervention for negotiators in value-driven conflicts. We hypothesize that this intervention fosters integrative negotiation behaviors and subjective outcomes. In an experimental 2 (motive: value vs. utility) by 2 (intervention: mindset vs. control) design, 253 participants negotiated online with a simulated counterpart. In contrast to predictions, the mindset led to more integrative trade-offs among utility-driven but not value-driven negotiators. However, the results support the effectiveness of the mindset intervention to improve subjective outcomes of value-driven negotiators. Without the intervention, they perceive the negotiation outcome as significantly less positive than utility-driven negotiators with the same objective outcome. In addition, explorative analyses show that without the mindset intervention, value-driven negotiators respect their counterpart less as a person of equal worth than utility-driven negotiators; this is no longer the case after activating the integrative mindset. The implications of these findings for resolving value conflicts and improving tolerance between parties with different value priorities are discussed.

KW - Psychology

KW - Negotiation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149225598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.34891/2022.0544

DO - 10.34891/2022.0544

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85149225598

VL - 16

SP - 80

EP - 99

JO - Negotiation and Conflict Management Research

JF - Negotiation and Conflict Management Research

SN - 1750-4708

IS - 1

ER -

In der gleichen Zeitschrift

When control does not pay off: The dilemma between trade-off opportunities and budget restrictions in B2B negotiations

Mann, M., Warsitzka, M., Zhang, H., Hüffmeier, J. & Trötschel, R., 06.04.2022, in: Negotiation and Conflict Management Research. 15, 4, S. 240-263 24 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Weitere Publikationen dieser Person(en)

Did Descriptive and Prescriptive Norms About Gender Equality at Home Change During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross-National Investigation

Saxler, F. M., Dorrough, A. R., Froehlich, L., Block, K., Croft, A., Meeussen, L., Olsson, M., Schmader, T., Schuster, C., van Grootel, S., Van Laar, C., Atkinson, C., Benson-Greenwald, T., Birneanu, A., Cavojova, V., Cheryan, S., Lee Kai Chung, A., Danyliuk, I., Dar-Nimrod, I., de Lemus, S., Diekman, A., Eisner, L., Estevan-Reina, L., Fedáková, D., Gavreliuc, A., Gavreliuc, D., Germano, A., Hässler, T., Henningsen, L., Ishii, K., Kundtová Klocová, E., Kozytska, I., Kulich, C., Lapytskaia Aidy, C., López López, W., Morandini, J., Ramis, T. S., Scheifele, C., Steele, J., Steffens, M. C., Velásquez Díaz, L. M., Venegas, M. & Martiny, S. E., 29.01.2024, (Elektronische Veröffentlichung vor Drucklegung) in: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 15 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Expanding the pie or spoiling the cake? How the number of negotiation issues affects integrative bargaining

Warsitzka, M., Zhang, H., Beersma, B., Freund, P. A. & Trötschel, R., 2023, (Angenommen/Im Druck) in: Journal of Applied Psychology.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Gender Gap in Parental Leave Intentions: Evidence from 37 Countries

Olsson, M. I. T., van Grootel, S., Block, K., Schuster, C., Meeussen, L., Van Laar, C., Schmader, T., Croft, A., Sun, M. S., Ainsaar, M., Aarntzen, L., Adamus, M., Anderson, J., Atkinson, C., Avicenna, M., Bąbel, P., Barth, M., Benson-Greenwald, T. M., Maloku, E., Berent, J., Bergsieker, H. B., Biernat, M., Bîrneanu, A. G., Bodinaku, B., Bosak, J., Bosson, J., Branković, M., Burkauskas, J., Čavojová, V., Cheryan, S., Choi, E., Choi, I., Contreras-Ibáñez, C. C., Coogan, A., Danyliuk, I., Dar-Nimrod, I., Dasgupta, N., de Lemus, S., Devos, T., Diab, M., Diekman, A. B., Efremova, M., Eisner, L., Eller, A., Erentaite, R., Fedáková, D., Franc, R., Gartzia, L., Gavreliuc, A., Gavreliuc, D., Gecaite-Stonciene, J., Germano, A. L., Giovannelli, I., Diaz, R. G., Gitikhmayeva, L., Gizaw, A. M., Gjoneska, B., González, O. M., González, R., Grijalva, I. D., Güngör, D., Sendén, M. G., Hall, W., Harb, C., Hassan, B., Hässler, T., Hawi, D. R., Henningsen, L., Hoppe, A., Ishii, K., Jakšić, I., Jasini, A., Jurkevičienė, J., Kelmendi, K., Kirby, T. A., Kitakaji, Y., Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., Kozytska, I., Kulich, C., Kundtová-Klocová, E., Kunuroglu, F., Aidy, C. L., Lee, A., Lindqvist, A., López-López, W., Luzvinda, L., Maricchiolo, F., Martinot, D., McNamara, R. A., Meister, A., Melka, T. L., Mickuviene, N., Miranda-Orrego, M. I., Mkamwa, T., Morandini, J., Morton, T., Mrisho, D., Nikitin, J., Otten, S., Pacilli, M. G., Page-Gould, E., Perandrés, A., Pizarro, J., Pop-Jordanova, N., Pyrkosz-Pacyna, J., Quta, S., Ramis, T. S., Rani, N., Redersdorff, S., Régner, I., Renström, E. A., Rivera-Rodriguez, A., Rocha, S. T. E., Ryabichenko, T., Saab, R., Sakata, K., Samekin, A., Sánchez-Pachecho, T., Scheifele, C., Schulmeyer, M. K., Sczesny, S., Sirlopú, D., Smith-Castro, V., Soo, K., Spaccatini, F., Steele, J. R., Steffens, M. C., Sucic, I., Vandello, J., Velásquez-Díaz, L. M., Vink, M., Vives, E., Warkineh, T. Z., Žeželj, I., Zhang, X., Zhao, X. & Martiny, S. E., 01.12.2023, in: Political Psychology. 44, 6, S. 1163-1192 30 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Nine Degrees of Uncertainty in Negotiations

Schauer, M., Majer, J. M. & Trötschel, R., 01.05.2023, in: Negotiation Journal. 39, 2, S. 207-228 22 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Present generation’s negotiators realize their interests at the cost of future generations

Treek, M., Majer, J. M., Zhang, H., Zhang, K. & Trötschel, R., 01.11.2023, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology. 91, 102126.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

DOI