Who does all the research in conservation biology?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Who does all the research in conservation biology? / Fazey, I.; Fischer, J.; Lindenmayer, D. B.

In: Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 14, No. 4, 01.04.2005, p. 917-934.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Fazey I, Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB. Who does all the research in conservation biology? Biodiversity and Conservation. 2005 Apr 1;14(4):917-934. doi: 10.1007/s10531-004-7849-9

Bibtex

@article{6e06695c1dcd4ba9bc7be360f1be5728,
title = "Who does all the research in conservation biology?",
abstract = "Much of the world's biodiversity is located within countries with developing economies. We therefore examine how well developing nations and their scientists are represented in three international conservation biology journals (Conservation Biology, Biological Conservation, Biodiversity and Conservation). We found: (1) that 28% of studies were from lower income countries and only 15% of all papers had primary authors from these nations. Of papers from lower income countries, although 80% had at least one local author, only 47% had primary authors from the country where the study was conducted. (2) Lower income countries had more research with a strong applied focus compared to research from high-income countries. (3) In lower income countries research was often funded by international sources but the primary authors of these studies were from affluent nations. (4) The three journals differed in how well they represented lower income nations and their scientists, reflecting their editorial policies for including research from lower income nations. The main reason for the large discrepancy in a country's output of conservation research is due to the difference in a nation's ability to invest in science. However, a brief survey of authors suggests that there is a large amount of information available in lower income and non-English speaking countries that is not easily accessible to the international conservation community. Journals may therefore need to consider altering their policies if we are to improve the representation of research by scientists in lower income nations.",
keywords = "Biology, Accessibility of research , Conservation biology, Developing countries, Publications in conservation , Scientific investment",
author = "I. Fazey and J. Fischer and Lindenmayer, {D. B.}",
note = "Funding Information: We thank those who responded to our survey. S. Dovers and N. Chettri read previous versions of the manuscript and provided useful comments. I.F. and J.F. are funded by EE GSS scholarships from The Australian National University.",
year = "2005",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10531-004-7849-9",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "917--934",
journal = "Biodiversity and Conservation",
issn = "0960-3115",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who does all the research in conservation biology?

AU - Fazey, I.

AU - Fischer, J.

AU - Lindenmayer, D. B.

N1 - Funding Information: We thank those who responded to our survey. S. Dovers and N. Chettri read previous versions of the manuscript and provided useful comments. I.F. and J.F. are funded by EE GSS scholarships from The Australian National University.

PY - 2005/4/1

Y1 - 2005/4/1

N2 - Much of the world's biodiversity is located within countries with developing economies. We therefore examine how well developing nations and their scientists are represented in three international conservation biology journals (Conservation Biology, Biological Conservation, Biodiversity and Conservation). We found: (1) that 28% of studies were from lower income countries and only 15% of all papers had primary authors from these nations. Of papers from lower income countries, although 80% had at least one local author, only 47% had primary authors from the country where the study was conducted. (2) Lower income countries had more research with a strong applied focus compared to research from high-income countries. (3) In lower income countries research was often funded by international sources but the primary authors of these studies were from affluent nations. (4) The three journals differed in how well they represented lower income nations and their scientists, reflecting their editorial policies for including research from lower income nations. The main reason for the large discrepancy in a country's output of conservation research is due to the difference in a nation's ability to invest in science. However, a brief survey of authors suggests that there is a large amount of information available in lower income and non-English speaking countries that is not easily accessible to the international conservation community. Journals may therefore need to consider altering their policies if we are to improve the representation of research by scientists in lower income nations.

AB - Much of the world's biodiversity is located within countries with developing economies. We therefore examine how well developing nations and their scientists are represented in three international conservation biology journals (Conservation Biology, Biological Conservation, Biodiversity and Conservation). We found: (1) that 28% of studies were from lower income countries and only 15% of all papers had primary authors from these nations. Of papers from lower income countries, although 80% had at least one local author, only 47% had primary authors from the country where the study was conducted. (2) Lower income countries had more research with a strong applied focus compared to research from high-income countries. (3) In lower income countries research was often funded by international sources but the primary authors of these studies were from affluent nations. (4) The three journals differed in how well they represented lower income nations and their scientists, reflecting their editorial policies for including research from lower income nations. The main reason for the large discrepancy in a country's output of conservation research is due to the difference in a nation's ability to invest in science. However, a brief survey of authors suggests that there is a large amount of information available in lower income and non-English speaking countries that is not easily accessible to the international conservation community. Journals may therefore need to consider altering their policies if we are to improve the representation of research by scientists in lower income nations.

KW - Biology

KW - Accessibility of research

KW - Conservation biology

KW - Developing countries

KW - Publications in conservation

KW - Scientific investment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17844405893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/898fb092-cb52-3eed-b23e-c092315b7f87/

U2 - 10.1007/s10531-004-7849-9

DO - 10.1007/s10531-004-7849-9

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 14

SP - 917

EP - 934

JO - Biodiversity and Conservation

JF - Biodiversity and Conservation

SN - 0960-3115

IS - 4

ER -