Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews. / Bull, Peter; Fetzer, Anita.
In: Text & talk, Vol. 26, No. 1, 26.01.2006, p. 3-37.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{bf8509cd440d4e59ac8a3fa896cb76e0,
title = "Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews",
abstract = "In the discourse of political interviews, references to coparticipants can be expressed explicitly by proper nouns and forms of address, and they can be expressed implicitly by personal pronouns and other indexical expressions. The meaning of personal pronouns is context dependent and retrievable only by inference, and therefore is less determinate. Furthermore, it can shift as the status of the participants shifts in interaction. This may occur both in terms of social roles and in terms of roles in talk and footing. In this context, an analysis was conducted of televised political interviews broadcast during the 1997 and 2001 British general elections and just before the war with Iraq in 2003. Question-response sequences were identified in which politicians made use of pronominal shifts as a form of equivocation. These sequences were analyzed in the context of Bavelas et al.'s (1990) theory of equivocation and Goman's (1981) concept of footing. In all but one of the questions, the interviewers sought to establish the politicians' authorship, whereas the politician typically responds in terms of the principal; in the other instance, the questioner sought to establish the position of the principal and the politician responds in terms of his own authorship. Possible strategic advantages of these forms of equivocation are discussed. {\textcopyright} Walter de Gruyter 2006.",
keywords = "English, Equivocation, Footing, Personal pronouns, Political interviews, Questions, Strategic communication",
author = "Peter Bull and Anita Fetzer",
year = "2006",
month = jan,
day = "26",
doi = "10.1515/TEXT.2006.002",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "3--37",
journal = "Text & talk",
issn = "1860-7330",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews

AU - Bull, Peter

AU - Fetzer, Anita

PY - 2006/1/26

Y1 - 2006/1/26

N2 - In the discourse of political interviews, references to coparticipants can be expressed explicitly by proper nouns and forms of address, and they can be expressed implicitly by personal pronouns and other indexical expressions. The meaning of personal pronouns is context dependent and retrievable only by inference, and therefore is less determinate. Furthermore, it can shift as the status of the participants shifts in interaction. This may occur both in terms of social roles and in terms of roles in talk and footing. In this context, an analysis was conducted of televised political interviews broadcast during the 1997 and 2001 British general elections and just before the war with Iraq in 2003. Question-response sequences were identified in which politicians made use of pronominal shifts as a form of equivocation. These sequences were analyzed in the context of Bavelas et al.'s (1990) theory of equivocation and Goman's (1981) concept of footing. In all but one of the questions, the interviewers sought to establish the politicians' authorship, whereas the politician typically responds in terms of the principal; in the other instance, the questioner sought to establish the position of the principal and the politician responds in terms of his own authorship. Possible strategic advantages of these forms of equivocation are discussed. © Walter de Gruyter 2006.

AB - In the discourse of political interviews, references to coparticipants can be expressed explicitly by proper nouns and forms of address, and they can be expressed implicitly by personal pronouns and other indexical expressions. The meaning of personal pronouns is context dependent and retrievable only by inference, and therefore is less determinate. Furthermore, it can shift as the status of the participants shifts in interaction. This may occur both in terms of social roles and in terms of roles in talk and footing. In this context, an analysis was conducted of televised political interviews broadcast during the 1997 and 2001 British general elections and just before the war with Iraq in 2003. Question-response sequences were identified in which politicians made use of pronominal shifts as a form of equivocation. These sequences were analyzed in the context of Bavelas et al.'s (1990) theory of equivocation and Goman's (1981) concept of footing. In all but one of the questions, the interviewers sought to establish the politicians' authorship, whereas the politician typically responds in terms of the principal; in the other instance, the questioner sought to establish the position of the principal and the politician responds in terms of his own authorship. Possible strategic advantages of these forms of equivocation are discussed. © Walter de Gruyter 2006.

KW - English

KW - Equivocation

KW - Footing

KW - Personal pronouns

KW - Political interviews

KW - Questions

KW - Strategic communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247344539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f2069375-7571-31f1-9fc4-f187eba821e3/

U2 - 10.1515/TEXT.2006.002

DO - 10.1515/TEXT.2006.002

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 26

SP - 3

EP - 37

JO - Text & talk

JF - Text & talk

SN - 1860-7330

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Special issue on Responsible Management Learning:
  2. Think globally, learn locally!
  3. Can learning to move foster sustainable development? A systematic literature review examining the potential of sport and physical activity in the context of environmental and sustainability education
  4. Eine Gesellschaft des Interviews / A Society of the Interview
  5. Modulating immune responses and inflammation
  6. Sozialberichterstattung
  7. Against abstraction: Zoe Leonard's "Analogue"
  8. Participation for effective environmental governance? Evidence from Water Framework Directive implementation in Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom
  9. Cybernetics
  10. Mentoring in schulischen Praxisphasen
  11. The contribution of material circularity to sustainability—Recycling and reuse of textiles
  12. Structural forces driving global integration
  13. Effectiveness of an Internet-Based Self-Help Intervention versus Public Mental Health Advice to Reduce Worry during the COVID-19 Pandemic
  14. Anaerobic Inhibition and Biodegradation of Antibiotics in ISO Test Schemes
  15. Predicting satisfaction with democracy in Germany using local economic conditions, social capital, and individual characteristics
  16. The New Media
  17. Didactics of Mathematics in Higher Education as a Scientific Discipline - Conference Proceedings
  18. To Own or to Use
  19. Reflecting on the Roles and Skill Sets of Designers and Design Researchers
  20. Walter Benjamin. Der Autor als Produzent
  21. Touching Things
  22. Tasks and Evaluation of Human Resource Departments
  23. Information Communication Technology as Creativity Support Tools?
  24. The role of expert feedback in the development of pre-service teachers’ professional vision of classroom management in an online blended learning environment
  25. Potential of mobility services
  26. The difficulty of behavior as a (regulated) natural monopolist
  27. Institutional entrepreneurship for responsible digital innovation
  28. The Development of Civil Societies
  29. The art of crowdfunding arts and innovation
  30. Der Zeitpfeil im Digitalen
  31. Toward industrial silicone 3D printing of soft robots
  32. Sustainable chemistry and food systems lessons-the same procedure as every year?
  33. § 2 Zur Konzeption des Handbuchs