Challenges in contrast: A function-to-form approach

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearch

Authors

Challenges express the speaker’s intention not to comply with a proposition, force or presupposition communicated in and through a prior conversational contribution. This may be a directly adjacent contribution, some less directly adjacent contribution, or a conversational contribution uttered in some prior discourse. As for its sequential status, a challenge is a responsive contribution, and from an interpersonal perspective, it tends to carry a high degree of face-threatening potential. A felicitous analysis of a challenge thus needs to go beyond a single conversational contribution, not only accommodating context but also the nature of a challenge’s embeddedness in context. The contribution is organized as follows: The first section systematizes the necessary and sufficient contextual constraints and requirements for a conversational contribution to be assigned the status of a challenge. The second part argues for a challenge to be conceptualized as a particularized contextual configuration, which may serve as a tertium comparationis in contrastive pragmatics. The third section exemplifies the frame of reference with a contrastive analysis of British and German challenges adopted from a corpus of political interviews. In both sets of data, challenges tend to be realized implicitly, and in both sets, challenging the content of a contribution is more frequent than challenging its force or presuppositions. While the British data display a wider variety of challenges, the German data prefer the content-based, implicitly realized challenge.
Original languageEnglish
JournalLanguages in Contrast
Volume9
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)73-97
Number of pages25
ISSN1387-6759
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Research areas

  • English - Context, Contrastive pragmatics, English/German, Function-to-form mapping, Rejection

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. The Importance of Business Continuity for Making Business: The Case of Design Kitchen
  2. Körper
  3. Enacting a Grand Challenge for Business and Society
  4. Attracting attention from peers
  5. The impact of distributed leadership on teacher commitment
  6. Multi-trophic guilds respond differently to changing elevation in a subtropical forest
  7. Applying thematic analysis to analyse press coverage in cross-country comparative research
  8. Treppauf, Treppab
  9. "Sorry Miss, I completely forgot about it"
  10. Aesthetics of the past and the future
  11. The Basic Values of Russian and European Schoolteachers
  12. SOME IMPEDIMENTS WITH DISTINCT MENTALITY IN SOZIALPADAGOGIK AND CHILD AND ADOLESCENT-PSYCHIATRY
  13. When Privacy Goes Public
  14. Stakeholder und Unternehmensrisiko
  15. Radicalisation of ‘lone actors’
  16. Educating Future Change Agents
  17. Maximal strength measurement
  18. Wege zum Campus
  19. Wie werden Lerngegenstände zu Gegenständen?
  20. Which clicks lead to conversions?
  21. In die Mitarbeiter investieren
  22. Evaluation of the toxic effects of four anti-cancer drugs in plant bioassays and its potency for screening in the context of waste water reuse for irrigation
  23. Punitive Damages
  24. Mehr Füchse, weniger Igel!
  25. Ausschüsse
  26. Surveying Southern Mongolia
  27. Fantasy about the future as friend and foe
  28. On the emergence of the in–out effect across trials
  29. Hot Extrusion Dies with Conformal Cooling Channels Produced by Additive Manufacturing
  30. Developing a Green Business Portfolio
  31. Parents’ Views of Video Games
  32. Migrationskontrolle durch Flüchtlingsschutz?
  33. Warrant price responses to credit spread changes
  34. Response diversity as a sustainability strategy
  35. Goldhagen-Debatte
  36. Cartel behaviour and efficient sanctioning by criminal sentences
  37. CorpusTracer
  38. Income distribution and willingness to pay for ecosystem services
  39. Playing for meaning
  40. Faktor Fünf
  41. Does money "buy" tolerance toward damage-causing wildlife?
  42. Introducing ‘cultures of rejection’