Which nudges get support? – A quantitative analysis of the dimensions transparency and dual process theory

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Which nudges get support? – A quantitative analysis of the dimensions transparency and dual process theory. / Wissmann, Hannes; Suessmair, Augustin.
In: International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2025, p. 415-440.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{425c97a162d844b8a608d27711e9f1bf,
title = "Which nudges get support? – A quantitative analysis of the dimensions transparency and dual process theory",
abstract = "Policymakers have been increasingly interested in so-called {\textquoteleft}nudges{\textquoteright} which are behaviourally informed policy measures. The legitimacy and acceptability of nudging is controversially debated. In this paper, the acceptability of nudges was examined by the framework of Hansen and Jespersen (2013), which classifies nudges into four types by distinguishing on a dual process theory dimension and on an epistemic transparency dimension. An online questionnaire was developed in which 135 participants stated their support for the different types of nudges applied in the areas of health and sustainability. It was hypothesised that for both and across areas, the support would decrease in the following order: transparent system 2, transparent system 1, non-transparent system 1, and non-transparent system 2 nudges. The hypotheses could be confirmed for sustainability nudges and across application areas. Further analysis indicated that lower education, higher income, and higher environmental awareness are positively correlated with acceptance of sustainability nudges.",
keywords = "behaviour change, behavioural experiment, health, nudging, public policy, sustainability, Psychology",
author = "Hannes Wissmann and Augustin Suessmair",
note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2025 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.",
year = "2025",
doi = "10.1504/IJEBR.2025.148941",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "415--440",
journal = "International Journal of Economics and Business Research",
issn = "1756-9850",
publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Which nudges get support? – A quantitative analysis of the dimensions transparency and dual process theory

AU - Wissmann, Hannes

AU - Suessmair, Augustin

N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2025 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - Policymakers have been increasingly interested in so-called ‘nudges’ which are behaviourally informed policy measures. The legitimacy and acceptability of nudging is controversially debated. In this paper, the acceptability of nudges was examined by the framework of Hansen and Jespersen (2013), which classifies nudges into four types by distinguishing on a dual process theory dimension and on an epistemic transparency dimension. An online questionnaire was developed in which 135 participants stated their support for the different types of nudges applied in the areas of health and sustainability. It was hypothesised that for both and across areas, the support would decrease in the following order: transparent system 2, transparent system 1, non-transparent system 1, and non-transparent system 2 nudges. The hypotheses could be confirmed for sustainability nudges and across application areas. Further analysis indicated that lower education, higher income, and higher environmental awareness are positively correlated with acceptance of sustainability nudges.

AB - Policymakers have been increasingly interested in so-called ‘nudges’ which are behaviourally informed policy measures. The legitimacy and acceptability of nudging is controversially debated. In this paper, the acceptability of nudges was examined by the framework of Hansen and Jespersen (2013), which classifies nudges into four types by distinguishing on a dual process theory dimension and on an epistemic transparency dimension. An online questionnaire was developed in which 135 participants stated their support for the different types of nudges applied in the areas of health and sustainability. It was hypothesised that for both and across areas, the support would decrease in the following order: transparent system 2, transparent system 1, non-transparent system 1, and non-transparent system 2 nudges. The hypotheses could be confirmed for sustainability nudges and across application areas. Further analysis indicated that lower education, higher income, and higher environmental awareness are positively correlated with acceptance of sustainability nudges.

KW - behaviour change

KW - behavioural experiment

KW - health

KW - nudging

KW - public policy

KW - sustainability

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105018616985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1504/IJEBR.2025.148941

DO - 10.1504/IJEBR.2025.148941

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:105018616985

VL - 29

SP - 415

EP - 440

JO - International Journal of Economics and Business Research

JF - International Journal of Economics and Business Research

SN - 1756-9850

IS - 6

ER -