What Kind of Veto Player Is the Italian Senate? A Comparative Analysis of European Second Chambers
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Journal of Modern Italian Studies, Vol. 22, No. 5, 30.11.2017, p. 604-623.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - What Kind of Veto Player Is the Italian Senate?
T2 - A Comparative Analysis of European Second Chambers
AU - Vercesi, Michelangelo
PY - 2017/11/30
Y1 - 2017/11/30
N2 - The literature finds evidence that the presence of strong institutional veto players correlates with policy gridlocks. In recent years, in several European countries the rationale of parliamentary second chambers as veto players has been called into question. With regard to Italy, in 2016 the parliament approved a broad constitutional reform, later rejected by a referendum. According to the proponents, this reform would have made Italian institutions more functional in a comparative perspective. Did voters actually block some sort of functionality? To answer this question, this article presents a systematic comparison of second chambers in the European Union. The theoretical framework is based on three dimensions of strength, operationalized by means of quantitative indicators and a comprehensive index of strength. The article ends with a discussion of the findings and a proposal for further research outlooks
AB - The literature finds evidence that the presence of strong institutional veto players correlates with policy gridlocks. In recent years, in several European countries the rationale of parliamentary second chambers as veto players has been called into question. With regard to Italy, in 2016 the parliament approved a broad constitutional reform, later rejected by a referendum. According to the proponents, this reform would have made Italian institutions more functional in a comparative perspective. Did voters actually block some sort of functionality? To answer this question, this article presents a systematic comparison of second chambers in the European Union. The theoretical framework is based on three dimensions of strength, operationalized by means of quantitative indicators and a comprehensive index of strength. The article ends with a discussion of the findings and a proposal for further research outlooks
KW - Politics
KW - Constitutional reform
KW - Italian parliament
KW - Second chambers
KW - Legitimacy
KW - Bicameralism
KW - Representation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036592673&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1354571X.2017.1389523
DO - 10.1080/1354571X.2017.1389523
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 22
SP - 604
EP - 623
JO - Journal of Modern Italian Studies
JF - Journal of Modern Italian Studies
SN - 1354-571X
IS - 5
ER -