“We Can’t Compete on Human Rights”: Creating Market-Protected Spaces to Institutionalize the Emerging Logic of Responsible Management
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 66, No. 4, 08.2023, p. 1071-1101.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - “We Can’t Compete on Human Rights”
T2 - Creating Market-Protected Spaces to Institutionalize the Emerging Logic of Responsible Management
AU - Schüßler, Elke S.
AU - Lohmeyer, Nora
AU - Ashwin, Sarah
N1 - Funding Information: Action Plan [for Human Rights] comes from the Federal Foreign Office, then there’s also the Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs with the Berlin Leonardo Marques, Carolin Puhl, Eshan Samimi, Joerg Sydow, and Waldemar Kremser. We also want to thank three anonymous reviewers and the handling editor, Jennifer Howard-Grenville, for detailed and constructive comments and excellent guidance. We gratefully acknowledge funding by the Volkswagen Foundation for the project “Changes in the Governance of Garment Global Production Networks: Lead Firm, Supplier, and Institutional Responses to the Rana Plaza Disaster” under the European and Global Challenges Program. All correspondence should be directed to lead author Elke S. Schuessler (elke.schuessler@leuphana.de). The second and third author have contributed equally. Publisher Copyright: Copyright of the Academy of Management, all rights reserved.
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - To what extent are multinational corporations able to address societal challenges through voluntary corporate social responsibility (CSR)? Based on an in-depth qualitative study of how apparel multinational corporations have addressed labor standards violations since the deadly 2013 Rana Plaza factory collapse, we show how CSR managers navigate the tension between the emerging responsible management logic and the highly institutionalized market logic, revealing how some go beyond accommodating responsible management within the market by prioritizing responsible management in market-protected spaces. We theorize the construction of market-protected spaces as a multilevel mechanism for institutionalizing an emerging logic in the context of a field dominated by the market logic via three forms of institutional work: restraining the jurisdiction of the market logic, infusing the responsible management logic with nonmarket elements, and maintaining market-protected spaces against resistance. A “market-protected space” is an institutionally bound space that suspends the dominance of the market logic on selected issues based on a binding institutional infrastructure that allows prioritizing responsible management—unlike voluntary CSR, which still prioritizes the market logic. The concept of a market-protected space maps a path for policy-makers, managers, and other actors interested in institutionalizing responsible management in the global economy.
AB - To what extent are multinational corporations able to address societal challenges through voluntary corporate social responsibility (CSR)? Based on an in-depth qualitative study of how apparel multinational corporations have addressed labor standards violations since the deadly 2013 Rana Plaza factory collapse, we show how CSR managers navigate the tension between the emerging responsible management logic and the highly institutionalized market logic, revealing how some go beyond accommodating responsible management within the market by prioritizing responsible management in market-protected spaces. We theorize the construction of market-protected spaces as a multilevel mechanism for institutionalizing an emerging logic in the context of a field dominated by the market logic via three forms of institutional work: restraining the jurisdiction of the market logic, infusing the responsible management logic with nonmarket elements, and maintaining market-protected spaces against resistance. A “market-protected space” is an institutionally bound space that suspends the dominance of the market logic on selected issues based on a binding institutional infrastructure that allows prioritizing responsible management—unlike voluntary CSR, which still prioritizes the market logic. The concept of a market-protected space maps a path for policy-makers, managers, and other actors interested in institutionalizing responsible management in the global economy.
KW - Management studies
KW - Research Methods
KW - Qualitative Orientation
KW - Human Resource Management and Industrial Relations
KW - Corporate social responsibility
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/d67284fb-af4f-30b7-afa9-6c9f764a9568/
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170674776&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5465/amj.2020.1614
DO - 10.5465/amj.2020.1614
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 66
SP - 1071
EP - 1101
JO - Academy of Management Journal
JF - Academy of Management Journal
SN - 0001-4273
IS - 4
ER -