Virtual participatory mapping of nature-based solutions in the Grande de Tárcoles River basin, Costa Rica: Connecting diverse knowledge systems in a context of physical immobility
Research output: Journal contributions › Comments / Debate / Reports › Research
Standard
In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 872, 162195, 10.05.2023.
Research output: Journal contributions › Comments / Debate / Reports › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Virtual participatory mapping of nature-based solutions in the Grande de Tárcoles River basin, Costa Rica
T2 - Connecting diverse knowledge systems in a context of physical immobility
AU - Schröter, Barbara
AU - Gottwald, Sarah
AU - Castro-Arce, Karina
AU - Hartkopf, Eva
AU - Aguilar-González, Bernardo
AU - Albert, Christian
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/5/10
Y1 - 2023/5/10
N2 - Co-design processes are of key importance in planning and implementing Nature-based Solutions (NBS), but require boundary management between diverse holders of local, practical and scientific knowledge. Participatory and map-based planning tools, such as Geodesign workshops, can facilitate such boundary management through mobilising knowledge holders, and translating and negotiating between different perspectives. The COVID-19 pandemic hindered physical mobility, but offered an, albeit unintended, opportunity to explore new ways of virtual mobility for facilitating boundary management in NBS co-design through digital participatory tools.This short communication aims to demonstrate how a spatial planning process for NBS can be facilitated in an online context. We draw on an international case study for co-designing NBS in Costa Rica, conducted during the severe lock-down restriction of the COVID-19 pandemic. This novel approach showcases how physical presence and movement is replaced by virtual mobility enabled through an online geographic map-based environment that allowed participants to communicate their opinions and co-create local and regional NBS actions. The case study included developing and testing a co-design tool to understand and map local perceptions of social-ecological problems, and an actual co-design process for siting NBS options and jointly exploring their implications. We present two levels of the process: 1) the adaptation of the co-design tool, and 2) the use and usefulness of the co-design tool. Our evaluation shows that the tool served its purpose well and provided useful support to local stakeholders. We recommend to test further strategical combinations of in-person and virtual methods in NBS co-design processes to improve NBS planning and implementation.
AB - Co-design processes are of key importance in planning and implementing Nature-based Solutions (NBS), but require boundary management between diverse holders of local, practical and scientific knowledge. Participatory and map-based planning tools, such as Geodesign workshops, can facilitate such boundary management through mobilising knowledge holders, and translating and negotiating between different perspectives. The COVID-19 pandemic hindered physical mobility, but offered an, albeit unintended, opportunity to explore new ways of virtual mobility for facilitating boundary management in NBS co-design through digital participatory tools.This short communication aims to demonstrate how a spatial planning process for NBS can be facilitated in an online context. We draw on an international case study for co-designing NBS in Costa Rica, conducted during the severe lock-down restriction of the COVID-19 pandemic. This novel approach showcases how physical presence and movement is replaced by virtual mobility enabled through an online geographic map-based environment that allowed participants to communicate their opinions and co-create local and regional NBS actions. The case study included developing and testing a co-design tool to understand and map local perceptions of social-ecological problems, and an actual co-design process for siting NBS options and jointly exploring their implications. We present two levels of the process: 1) the adaptation of the co-design tool, and 2) the use and usefulness of the co-design tool. Our evaluation shows that the tool served its purpose well and provided useful support to local stakeholders. We recommend to test further strategical combinations of in-person and virtual methods in NBS co-design processes to improve NBS planning and implementation.
KW - Geodesign
KW - PPGIS
KW - Co-design
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Landscape planning
KW - Central America
KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148073090&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/492ce9c8-de1f-3111-8c5e-ba5ca9cf01af/
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162195
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162195
M3 - Comments / Debate / Reports
C2 - 36781131
VL - 872
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
SN - 0048-9697
M1 - 162195
ER -