Using density surface models to assess the ecological effectiveness of a protected area network in Tanzania

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Given recent global endeavors to increase protected area coverage, it is crucial to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of various area-based conservation strategies in effectively reducing biodiversity loss. Here, we investigated the responses of wildlife populations to different protection levels and environmental variables at the landscape scale in the Katavi–Rukwa Ecosystem, western Tanzania. To this end, we conducted line distance sampling surveys and counted the dung of six target mammal species (elephant, giraffe, buffalo, zebra, topi, and hartebeest) along foot transects within areas differing in protection levels (from strict to less-strictly protected: national park, game reserve, forest reserve, game-controlled area, and unprotected areas). Based on these dung counts, we modeled the spatial distribution of these six mammal species using a species-specific density surface modeling framework. We found consistent effects of protection level and land use variables on the spatial distribution of the target mammal species: dung densities were highest in the national park and game reserves, intermediate in less-strictly protected areas, and lowest in unprotected areas. Beyond species-specific environmental predictors for dung densities, our results highlight consistent negative associations between dung densities of the target species and distance to cropland and avoidance of areas in proximity to houses. Our findings underpin differences in ecological effectiveness of protected areas within one ecosystem. Protection level and land use play crucial roles in moderating the spatial distribution of all considered mammal species. Our findings suggest that a landscape approach needs to guide effective conservation across the entire protection gradient of the Katavi–Rukwa Ecosystem.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere4840
JournalEcosphere
Volume15
Issue number4
Number of pages16
ISSN2150-8925
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.04.2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Ecosphere published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America.

    Research areas

  • conservation effectiveness, conservation evidence, distance sampling, Miombo, protected and conserved areas, spatial distribution models
  • Ecosystems Research

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Effekte der Spielform Handball-Inklusiv auf Gruppen- und Hierarchiedenken in einer inklusiven Sportinitiative
  2. Inanspruchnahme von gesundheitsfördernden und präventiven Angeboten für Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund
  3. Comparison of three methods of length compensation in a parallel kinematic and their equivalence conditions
  4. Element distribution in the corrosion layer and cytotoxicity of alloy Mg-10Dy during in vitro biodegradation
  5. Gesetz über Unterlassungsklagen bei Verbraucherrechts-und anderen Verstößen (Unterlassungsklagengesetz-UKlaG)
  6. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) website disclosures: empirical evidence from the German banking industry
  7. Applying Quarter-Vehicle Model Simulation for Road Elevation Measurements Utilizing the Vehicle Level Sensor
  8. (Außergerichtliche) Streitbeilegung in Unternehmensnetzwerken: eine Herausforderung für das Konfliktmanagement
  9. Preventive Emergency Detection Based on the Probabilistic Evaluation of Distributed, Embedded Sensor Networks
  10. Die Literaturdatenbank "Elbe-Ökologie" im Forschungsverbund "Ökologische Forschung in der Stromlandschaft Elbe"
  11. Microstructure evolution of Mg-11Gd-4.5Y-1Nd-1.5Zn-0.5Zr (wt%) alloy during deformation and its effect on strengthening
  12. Action and action-regulation in entrepreneurship: Evaluating a student training for promoting entrepreneurship
  13. Creditor Relations - bilaterale Transparenz im Firmenkunden-Kreditgeschäft am Beispiel handwerklicher Betriebe
  14. Using photography to elicit grazier values and management practices relating to tree survival and recruitment
  15. Was bewirken sprachliche Variationen von Aufgabenkontexten für das Schreiben von argumentativen Schülertexten?