(Un)Mind the gap: How organizational actors cope with an identity–strategy misalignment
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Strategic Organization, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.02.2020, p. 212-244.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - (Un)Mind the gap
T2 - How organizational actors cope with an identity–strategy misalignment
AU - Wenzel, Matthias
AU - Cornelissen, Joep P.
AU - Koch, Jochen
AU - Hartmann, Michael
AU - Rauch, Madeleine
N1 - Special Issue: Exploring the Strategy-Identity Nexus
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - In this article, we explore how organizational actors cope with a perceived misalignment between their organization’s identity and strategy. Based on an inductive, interpretive case study at a public broadcasting organization, we identify three cognitive tactics through which organizational members cope with an identity–strategy misalignment: contextualization, abstraction, and fatalism. Furthermore, we show that the enactment of these cognitive coping tactics coincides with specific strategy-related tasks that prioritize different aspects of an organization’s identity and, therefore, invokes different conceptions of the identity–strategy misalignment. Based on these findings, we develop a framework that conceptualizes how organizational members cope with an identity–strategy misalignment. We end the article by discussing the implications of our study for further research on the linkages between organizational identity and strategy.
AB - In this article, we explore how organizational actors cope with a perceived misalignment between their organization’s identity and strategy. Based on an inductive, interpretive case study at a public broadcasting organization, we identify three cognitive tactics through which organizational members cope with an identity–strategy misalignment: contextualization, abstraction, and fatalism. Furthermore, we show that the enactment of these cognitive coping tactics coincides with specific strategy-related tasks that prioritize different aspects of an organization’s identity and, therefore, invokes different conceptions of the identity–strategy misalignment. Based on these findings, we develop a framework that conceptualizes how organizational members cope with an identity–strategy misalignment. We end the article by discussing the implications of our study for further research on the linkages between organizational identity and strategy.
KW - Management studies
KW - cognitive tactics
KW - coping
KW - misalignment
KW - organizational identity
KW - strategy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068204765&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1476127019856524
DO - 10.1177/1476127019856524
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85068204765
VL - 18
SP - 212
EP - 244
JO - Strategic Organization
JF - Strategic Organization
SN - 1476-1270
IS - 1
ER -