Transcending transmission: Towards a constitutive perspective on CSR communication

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Transcending transmission: Towards a constitutive perspective on CSR communication. / Schoeneborn, Dennis; Trittin, Hannah.
In: Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol. 18, No. 2, 04.2013, p. 193-211.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{685d2d1dca06408688ff85b2a63ca065,
title = "Transcending transmission: Towards a constitutive perspective on CSR communication",
abstract = "Purpose - Extant research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication primarily relies on a transmission model of communication that treats organizations and communication as distinct phenomena. This approach has been criticized for neglecting the formative role of communication in the emergence of organizations. This paper seeks to propose to reconceptualize CSR communication by drawing on the {"}communication constitutes organizations{"} (CCO) perspective. Design/methodology/approach - This is a conceptual paper that explores the implications of switching from an instrumental to a constitutive notion of communication. Findings - The study brings forth four main findings: from the CCO view, organizations are constituted by several, partly dissonant, and potentially contradictory communicative practices. From that viewpoint, the potential impact of CSR communication becomes a matter of connectivity of CSR to other practices of organizational communication. Communication practices that concern CSR should not be generally dismissed as mere {"}greenwashing{"} - given that some forms of talk can be action. Consequently, there is a need to investigate which specific speech acts create accountability and commitment in the context of CSR. The CCO view shows that CSR communication potentially extends the boundary of the organization through the involvement of third parties. Thus, it is fruitful to study CSR communication as a set of practices that aims at boundary maintenance and extension. Organizations are stabilized by various non-human entities that {"}act{"} on their behalf. Accordingly, CSR communication should also take into account non-human agency and responsibility. Originality/value - This paper links the literature on CSR communication to broader debates in organizational communication studies and, in particular, to the CCO perspective. By applying the CCO view, it reconceptualizes CSR communication as a complex process of meaning negotiation.",
keywords = "Management studies, CSR, CSR communication, Corporate communication, communication constitutes organization (CCO)",
author = "Dennis Schoeneborn and Hannah Trittin",
year = "2013",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1108/13563281311319481",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "193--211",
journal = "Corporate Communications: An International Journal",
issn = "1356-3289",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transcending transmission

T2 - Towards a constitutive perspective on CSR communication

AU - Schoeneborn, Dennis

AU - Trittin, Hannah

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Purpose - Extant research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication primarily relies on a transmission model of communication that treats organizations and communication as distinct phenomena. This approach has been criticized for neglecting the formative role of communication in the emergence of organizations. This paper seeks to propose to reconceptualize CSR communication by drawing on the "communication constitutes organizations" (CCO) perspective. Design/methodology/approach - This is a conceptual paper that explores the implications of switching from an instrumental to a constitutive notion of communication. Findings - The study brings forth four main findings: from the CCO view, organizations are constituted by several, partly dissonant, and potentially contradictory communicative practices. From that viewpoint, the potential impact of CSR communication becomes a matter of connectivity of CSR to other practices of organizational communication. Communication practices that concern CSR should not be generally dismissed as mere "greenwashing" - given that some forms of talk can be action. Consequently, there is a need to investigate which specific speech acts create accountability and commitment in the context of CSR. The CCO view shows that CSR communication potentially extends the boundary of the organization through the involvement of third parties. Thus, it is fruitful to study CSR communication as a set of practices that aims at boundary maintenance and extension. Organizations are stabilized by various non-human entities that "act" on their behalf. Accordingly, CSR communication should also take into account non-human agency and responsibility. Originality/value - This paper links the literature on CSR communication to broader debates in organizational communication studies and, in particular, to the CCO perspective. By applying the CCO view, it reconceptualizes CSR communication as a complex process of meaning negotiation.

AB - Purpose - Extant research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication primarily relies on a transmission model of communication that treats organizations and communication as distinct phenomena. This approach has been criticized for neglecting the formative role of communication in the emergence of organizations. This paper seeks to propose to reconceptualize CSR communication by drawing on the "communication constitutes organizations" (CCO) perspective. Design/methodology/approach - This is a conceptual paper that explores the implications of switching from an instrumental to a constitutive notion of communication. Findings - The study brings forth four main findings: from the CCO view, organizations are constituted by several, partly dissonant, and potentially contradictory communicative practices. From that viewpoint, the potential impact of CSR communication becomes a matter of connectivity of CSR to other practices of organizational communication. Communication practices that concern CSR should not be generally dismissed as mere "greenwashing" - given that some forms of talk can be action. Consequently, there is a need to investigate which specific speech acts create accountability and commitment in the context of CSR. The CCO view shows that CSR communication potentially extends the boundary of the organization through the involvement of third parties. Thus, it is fruitful to study CSR communication as a set of practices that aims at boundary maintenance and extension. Organizations are stabilized by various non-human entities that "act" on their behalf. Accordingly, CSR communication should also take into account non-human agency and responsibility. Originality/value - This paper links the literature on CSR communication to broader debates in organizational communication studies and, in particular, to the CCO perspective. By applying the CCO view, it reconceptualizes CSR communication as a complex process of meaning negotiation.

KW - Management studies

KW - CSR

KW - CSR communication

KW - Corporate communication

KW - communication constitutes organization (CCO)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878257333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/13563281311319481

DO - 10.1108/13563281311319481

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 18

SP - 193

EP - 211

JO - Corporate Communications: An International Journal

JF - Corporate Communications: An International Journal

SN - 1356-3289

IS - 2

ER -

Documents

DOI