The role of perceptions and social norms in shaping women’s fertility preferences: a case study from Ethiopia

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

The role of perceptions and social norms in shaping women’s fertility preferences : a case study from Ethiopia. / Rodrigues, Patrícia; Manlosa, Aisa O.; Fischer, Joern et al.

In: Sustainability Science, Vol. 17, No. 6, 01.11.2022, p. 2473-2488.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Rodrigues P, Manlosa AO, Fischer J, Schultner J, Hanspach J, Senbeta F et al. The role of perceptions and social norms in shaping women’s fertility preferences: a case study from Ethiopia. Sustainability Science. 2022 Nov 1;17(6):2473-2488. doi: 10.1007/s11625-022-01152-9

Bibtex

@article{f0dcd89b29b94fe798f51a3a94222c76,
title = "The role of perceptions and social norms in shaping women{\textquoteright}s fertility preferences: a case study from Ethiopia",
abstract = "The population–environment–food nexus is a sustainability challenge for the Global South, and for Africa in particular, where rapid human population growth typically overlaps with high levels of food insecurity and environmental degradation. In this context, it is important to understand the reasons driving high fertility in these regions. Here, we examined possible determinants of women{\textquoteright}s fertility preferences in rural southwestern Ethiopia. Using a survey tool (n = 120), we assessed women{\textquoteright}s perceptions of four key environmental stressors, namely food insecurity, environmental degradation, human population growth, and land scarcity. Through statistical modelling we tested whether there was a relationship between perceptions of future trends in these stressors and women{\textquoteright}s fertility preferences; expressed as their desired number of children and use of family planning methods. This analysis was complemented by a qualitative content analysis of the survey{\textquoteright}s open-ended questions, to contextualize and interpret the quantitative data. Our quantitative results indicated that perceptions of future trends in key stressors had little effect on fertility preferences of respondents, with the exception of perceptions of human population growth. Our qualitative data suggested that this may be due to the influence of social-cultural norms and religion, decision-making with the husband, as well as a perceived utilitarian value of children. These findings have important implications for the development of interventions to slow down human population growth. Our findings suggest the need to look beyond improved physical access to family planning, and develop a new suite of deliberative approaches that engage with social norms, religion, and gender equity.",
keywords = "Environmental degradation, Fertility, Food security, Human population growth, Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics",
author = "Patr{\'i}cia Rodrigues and Manlosa, {Aisa O.} and Joern Fischer and Jannik Schultner and Jan Hanspach and Feyera Senbeta and Ine Dorresteijn",
year = "2022",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11625-022-01152-9",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "2473--2488",
journal = "Sustainability Science",
issn = "1862-4065",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of perceptions and social norms in shaping women’s fertility preferences

T2 - a case study from Ethiopia

AU - Rodrigues, Patrícia

AU - Manlosa, Aisa O.

AU - Fischer, Joern

AU - Schultner, Jannik

AU - Hanspach, Jan

AU - Senbeta, Feyera

AU - Dorresteijn, Ine

PY - 2022/11/1

Y1 - 2022/11/1

N2 - The population–environment–food nexus is a sustainability challenge for the Global South, and for Africa in particular, where rapid human population growth typically overlaps with high levels of food insecurity and environmental degradation. In this context, it is important to understand the reasons driving high fertility in these regions. Here, we examined possible determinants of women’s fertility preferences in rural southwestern Ethiopia. Using a survey tool (n = 120), we assessed women’s perceptions of four key environmental stressors, namely food insecurity, environmental degradation, human population growth, and land scarcity. Through statistical modelling we tested whether there was a relationship between perceptions of future trends in these stressors and women’s fertility preferences; expressed as their desired number of children and use of family planning methods. This analysis was complemented by a qualitative content analysis of the survey’s open-ended questions, to contextualize and interpret the quantitative data. Our quantitative results indicated that perceptions of future trends in key stressors had little effect on fertility preferences of respondents, with the exception of perceptions of human population growth. Our qualitative data suggested that this may be due to the influence of social-cultural norms and religion, decision-making with the husband, as well as a perceived utilitarian value of children. These findings have important implications for the development of interventions to slow down human population growth. Our findings suggest the need to look beyond improved physical access to family planning, and develop a new suite of deliberative approaches that engage with social norms, religion, and gender equity.

AB - The population–environment–food nexus is a sustainability challenge for the Global South, and for Africa in particular, where rapid human population growth typically overlaps with high levels of food insecurity and environmental degradation. In this context, it is important to understand the reasons driving high fertility in these regions. Here, we examined possible determinants of women’s fertility preferences in rural southwestern Ethiopia. Using a survey tool (n = 120), we assessed women’s perceptions of four key environmental stressors, namely food insecurity, environmental degradation, human population growth, and land scarcity. Through statistical modelling we tested whether there was a relationship between perceptions of future trends in these stressors and women’s fertility preferences; expressed as their desired number of children and use of family planning methods. This analysis was complemented by a qualitative content analysis of the survey’s open-ended questions, to contextualize and interpret the quantitative data. Our quantitative results indicated that perceptions of future trends in key stressors had little effect on fertility preferences of respondents, with the exception of perceptions of human population growth. Our qualitative data suggested that this may be due to the influence of social-cultural norms and religion, decision-making with the husband, as well as a perceived utilitarian value of children. These findings have important implications for the development of interventions to slow down human population growth. Our findings suggest the need to look beyond improved physical access to family planning, and develop a new suite of deliberative approaches that engage with social norms, religion, and gender equity.

KW - Environmental degradation

KW - Fertility

KW - Food security

KW - Human population growth

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129773918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/9299e2ef-f958-30a5-8c15-f50653fe6764/

U2 - 10.1007/s11625-022-01152-9

DO - 10.1007/s11625-022-01152-9

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85129773918

VL - 17

SP - 2473

EP - 2488

JO - Sustainability Science

JF - Sustainability Science

SN - 1862-4065

IS - 6

ER -