The Power to Resist: Mobilization and the Logic of Terrorist Attacks in Civil War
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 53, No. 13, 01.11.2020, p. 2029-2060.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The Power to Resist
T2 - Mobilization and the Logic of Terrorist Attacks in Civil War
AU - Polo, Sara M.T.
AU - González, Belén
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - Existing research has argued that terrorism is common in civil war because it is “effective.” Surprisingly, however, only some groups use terrorism during civil wars, while many refrain altogether. We also see considerable variation in the use of terrorism over time. This article presents a theory of terrorism as a mobilization strategy in civil war, taking into account benefits, costs, and temporal dynamics. We argue that the choice and the timing of terrorism arise from the interaction between conditions for effective mobilization and battlefield dynamics. Terrorism can mobilize support when it provokes indiscriminate government repression or when it radicalizes rebels’ constituency by antagonizing specific societal groups. The timing of attacks, however, is influenced by battlefield losses, which increase rebels’ need to rally civilian support. The analyses of new disaggregated data on rebels’ terrorist attacks during conflicts (1989–2009) and of Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) tactics in Iraq and Syria support our theoretical argument.
AB - Existing research has argued that terrorism is common in civil war because it is “effective.” Surprisingly, however, only some groups use terrorism during civil wars, while many refrain altogether. We also see considerable variation in the use of terrorism over time. This article presents a theory of terrorism as a mobilization strategy in civil war, taking into account benefits, costs, and temporal dynamics. We argue that the choice and the timing of terrorism arise from the interaction between conditions for effective mobilization and battlefield dynamics. Terrorism can mobilize support when it provokes indiscriminate government repression or when it radicalizes rebels’ constituency by antagonizing specific societal groups. The timing of attacks, however, is influenced by battlefield losses, which increase rebels’ need to rally civilian support. The analyses of new disaggregated data on rebels’ terrorist attacks during conflicts (1989–2009) and of Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) tactics in Iraq and Syria support our theoretical argument.
KW - civil war
KW - conflict dynamics
KW - mobilization
KW - rebel groups
KW - terrorism
KW - Politics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083088171&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0010414020912264
DO - 10.1177/0010414020912264
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85083088171
VL - 53
SP - 2029
EP - 2060
JO - Comparative Political Studies
JF - Comparative Political Studies
SN - 0010-4140
IS - 13
ER -