The micro-processes during repatriate knowledge transfer: The repatriates’ perspective

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

The micro-processes during repatriate knowledge transfer: The repatriates’ perspective. / Burmeister, Anne; Deller, Jürgen; Osland, Joyce et al.
In: Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 19, No. 4, 13.07.2015, p. 735-755.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Burmeister A, Deller J, Osland J, Szkudlarek B, Oddou G, Blakeney R. The micro-processes during repatriate knowledge transfer: The repatriates’ perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2015 Jul 13;19(4):735-755. doi: 10.1108/JKM-01-2015-0011

Bibtex

@article{4e51e0393f3443899af7350bdf25f9ef,
title = "The micro-processes during repatriate knowledge transfer: The repatriates{\textquoteright} perspective",
abstract = "Purpose–The purpose of this paper is to add a process perspective to the literature on repatriate knowledge transfer (RKT) and to understand how the knowledge transfer process unfolds in the repatriation context. Thus, this qualitative study uses existing knowledge transfer process models to assess their applicability to the context of repatriation and explain the micro-processes during RKT. Design/methodology/approach–To provide a rich understanding of these processes from the repatriate perspective, critical incidents reported by 29 German and US American repatriates were content-analyzed. Findings–The findings are summarized in a proposed RKT process model, which describes the roles and knowledge transfer-related activities of repatriates, recipients and supervisors as well as their interaction during four transfer phases: assessment, initiation, execution and evaluation. Research limitations/implications–The experiences of repatriates from different geographic areas as well as the perspectives of knowledge recipients and supervisors were not studied but should be included in future research. In addition, future research could test the applicability of the identified micro-processes to different knowledge transfer contexts. Practical implications–Managers can use the findings to facilitate the RKT process more effectively because the type of organizational support offered can be aligned with the changing needs of repatriates, recipients and supervisors during the four identified phases. Originality/value–This is the first study that takes a process perspective to understand RKT. The integration of the current findings with the existing literature can enable a more nuanced view on RKT.",
keywords = "Content analysis, Critical incident technique, International assignment, Knowledge transfer process, Repatriate knowledge transfer, Repatriation",
author = "Anne Burmeister and J{\"u}rgen Deller and Joyce Osland and Betina Szkudlarek and Gary Oddou and Roger Blakeney",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Emerald Group Publishing Limited.",
year = "2015",
month = jul,
day = "13",
doi = "10.1108/JKM-01-2015-0011",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "735--755",
journal = "Journal of Knowledge Management",
issn = "1367-3270",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The micro-processes during repatriate knowledge transfer

T2 - The repatriates’ perspective

AU - Burmeister, Anne

AU - Deller, Jürgen

AU - Osland, Joyce

AU - Szkudlarek, Betina

AU - Oddou, Gary

AU - Blakeney, Roger

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

PY - 2015/7/13

Y1 - 2015/7/13

N2 - Purpose–The purpose of this paper is to add a process perspective to the literature on repatriate knowledge transfer (RKT) and to understand how the knowledge transfer process unfolds in the repatriation context. Thus, this qualitative study uses existing knowledge transfer process models to assess their applicability to the context of repatriation and explain the micro-processes during RKT. Design/methodology/approach–To provide a rich understanding of these processes from the repatriate perspective, critical incidents reported by 29 German and US American repatriates were content-analyzed. Findings–The findings are summarized in a proposed RKT process model, which describes the roles and knowledge transfer-related activities of repatriates, recipients and supervisors as well as their interaction during four transfer phases: assessment, initiation, execution and evaluation. Research limitations/implications–The experiences of repatriates from different geographic areas as well as the perspectives of knowledge recipients and supervisors were not studied but should be included in future research. In addition, future research could test the applicability of the identified micro-processes to different knowledge transfer contexts. Practical implications–Managers can use the findings to facilitate the RKT process more effectively because the type of organizational support offered can be aligned with the changing needs of repatriates, recipients and supervisors during the four identified phases. Originality/value–This is the first study that takes a process perspective to understand RKT. The integration of the current findings with the existing literature can enable a more nuanced view on RKT.

AB - Purpose–The purpose of this paper is to add a process perspective to the literature on repatriate knowledge transfer (RKT) and to understand how the knowledge transfer process unfolds in the repatriation context. Thus, this qualitative study uses existing knowledge transfer process models to assess their applicability to the context of repatriation and explain the micro-processes during RKT. Design/methodology/approach–To provide a rich understanding of these processes from the repatriate perspective, critical incidents reported by 29 German and US American repatriates were content-analyzed. Findings–The findings are summarized in a proposed RKT process model, which describes the roles and knowledge transfer-related activities of repatriates, recipients and supervisors as well as their interaction during four transfer phases: assessment, initiation, execution and evaluation. Research limitations/implications–The experiences of repatriates from different geographic areas as well as the perspectives of knowledge recipients and supervisors were not studied but should be included in future research. In addition, future research could test the applicability of the identified micro-processes to different knowledge transfer contexts. Practical implications–Managers can use the findings to facilitate the RKT process more effectively because the type of organizational support offered can be aligned with the changing needs of repatriates, recipients and supervisors during the four identified phases. Originality/value–This is the first study that takes a process perspective to understand RKT. The integration of the current findings with the existing literature can enable a more nuanced view on RKT.

KW - Content analysis

KW - Critical incident technique

KW - International assignment

KW - Knowledge transfer process

KW - Repatriate knowledge transfer

KW - Repatriation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931092253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JKM-01-2015-0011

DO - 10.1108/JKM-01-2015-0011

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 19

SP - 735

EP - 755

JO - Journal of Knowledge Management

JF - Journal of Knowledge Management

SN - 1367-3270

IS - 4

ER -

DOI