The focal-species approach and landscape restoration: a critique

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Authors

  • David B. Lindenmayer
  • Adrian D. Manning
  • P. L. Smith
  • Hugh Philip Possingham
  • Jörn Fischer
  • I. Oliver
  • M. A. McCarthy

In many parts of the world there is an urgent need for landscape restoration to conserve biodiversity. Landscape restoration is not straightforward, however, because many issues and processes must be understood for effective action to take place. In an attempt to guide restoration efforts for biodiversity conservation, Lambeck (1997, 1999) developed a taxon-based surrogate scheme called the focal-species approach. The focal-species approach involves the identification of a suite of species targeted for the management of threatening processes and vegetation-restoration efforts. Together, their "requirements for persistence define the attributes that must be present if [the landscape] is to meet the needs of the remaining biota" (Lambeck 1999). Some of our concerns with the focal-species approach include the following. First, the underlying theoretical basis of the focal-species approach is problematic. As part of a taxon-based surrogate scheme, a suite of focal species is presumed to act collectively as a surrogate for other elements of the biota. But taxon-based surrogate schemes have had limited success everywhere they have been applied. Second, the focal-species approach may be unsuitable for practical implementation, primarily because of the lack of data to guide the selection of a set of focal species in the majority of landscapes. We argue that restoration strategies should be based on appropriate theory, realistic assessment of available information, and an achievable outcome for the land managers who own or control the majority of land in the most significantly affected landscapes. Given the potential limitations of the focal-species approach, a mix of different strategies shouM be adopted in any given landscape and between different landscapes to spread risk of failure of any one approach. We believe that it is important to raise awareness about the potential limitations of the focal-species approach and to ensure that land managers do not assume it will inevitably lead to the conservation of all biota in a landscape.

Original languageEnglish
JournalConservation Biology
Volume16
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)338-345
Number of pages8
ISSN0888-8892
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.04.2002
Externally publishedYes

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Existenzgründung 1
  2. The impact of foreign takeovers: comparative evidence from foreign and domestic acquisitions in Germany
  3. Project-Mentoring
  4. Nitrosation and analysis of amino acid derivatives by isocratic HPLC
  5. Peter H. Reid. 2020. Every Hill a Burial Place
  6. Facilitating age diversity in organizations – Part I
  7. Tree species richness modulates water supply in the local tree neighbourhood
  8. Erga Omnes, Jus Cogens and their Impact on the Law of Responsibility
  9. Konfliktlösung durch Verhandlung
  10. Biogasanlagen müssen größer werden
  11. Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse und Human Resources (HR)
  12. Effects of digital video-based feedback environments on pre-service teachers’ feedback competence
  13. Migrantinnen in den Medien
  14. Genetic relatedness and chemical profiles in an unusually peaceful eusocial bee
  15. Nutzung von Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement-Software in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen
  16. European Management Styles
  17. Application of titanium dioxide nanoparticles as a photocatalyst for the removal of micropollutants such as pharmaceuticals from water
  18. Black Pedagogy 4.0: Art as a School Subject in the Wake of Competence Orientation and Digitalization
  19. A note on the granular nature of imports in German manufacturing industries
  20. Night-time noise annoyance
  21. Anerkennung
  22. Evolutionary Precursors of Negation in Non-Human Reasoning
  23. Leistungsorientierte Vergütung in Nonprofit-Organisationen?
  24. Vorsorgevollmachten in transnationalen Fällen
  25. Einschränkung der Mehrheitsdemokratie?
  26. Wahl:Freiheit?
  27. Hohe und niedrige Einkommen
  28. Gute Arbeit im Mittelstand
  29. Weblogs und Wikis, (Teil 2)
  30. Zwischen Pult und Bühne
  31. Die gantze Heilige Schrift ,,, zu unserer Seelen-Wolfahrt
  32. Zittern – Rebellieren – Sterben
  33. Komplexe Verhältnisse
  34. Sachunterricht für das 21. Jahrhundert. Mit dem Konzept Bildung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung arbeiten
  35. Gremlin-1 is an inhibitor of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and attenuates atherosclerotic plaque growth in ApoE-/- mice
  36. Ethik und Nachhaltigkeit.