The focal-species approach and landscape restoration: a critique

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Authors

  • David B. Lindenmayer
  • Adrian D. Manning
  • P. L. Smith
  • Hugh Philip Possingham
  • Jörn Fischer
  • I. Oliver
  • M. A. McCarthy

In many parts of the world there is an urgent need for landscape restoration to conserve biodiversity. Landscape restoration is not straightforward, however, because many issues and processes must be understood for effective action to take place. In an attempt to guide restoration efforts for biodiversity conservation, Lambeck (1997, 1999) developed a taxon-based surrogate scheme called the focal-species approach. The focal-species approach involves the identification of a suite of species targeted for the management of threatening processes and vegetation-restoration efforts. Together, their "requirements for persistence define the attributes that must be present if [the landscape] is to meet the needs of the remaining biota" (Lambeck 1999). Some of our concerns with the focal-species approach include the following. First, the underlying theoretical basis of the focal-species approach is problematic. As part of a taxon-based surrogate scheme, a suite of focal species is presumed to act collectively as a surrogate for other elements of the biota. But taxon-based surrogate schemes have had limited success everywhere they have been applied. Second, the focal-species approach may be unsuitable for practical implementation, primarily because of the lack of data to guide the selection of a set of focal species in the majority of landscapes. We argue that restoration strategies should be based on appropriate theory, realistic assessment of available information, and an achievable outcome for the land managers who own or control the majority of land in the most significantly affected landscapes. Given the potential limitations of the focal-species approach, a mix of different strategies shouM be adopted in any given landscape and between different landscapes to spread risk of failure of any one approach. We believe that it is important to raise awareness about the potential limitations of the focal-species approach and to ensure that land managers do not assume it will inevitably lead to the conservation of all biota in a landscape.

Original languageEnglish
JournalConservation Biology
Volume16
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)338-345
Number of pages8
ISSN0888-8892
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.04.2002
Externally publishedYes

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Critical Evaluation of Sustainable Development Goals and Circular Economy in (Business) Education
  2. Fungal hydrolysis in submerged fermentation for food waste treatment and fermentation feedstock preparation
  3. Mathe darstellend vernetzen
  4. Thermo-oxidative aging of linear and branched alcohols as stability criterion for their use as e-fuels
  5. Gender differences in knowledge, use, and collection of wild edible plants in three spanish areas
  6. Democratic Stakeholder Representativeness
  7. Gone and forgotten
  8. Biodiversität, Ökosystemfunktionen und Naturschutz
  9. Unternehmensführung mit SAP BI
  10. A typology of actors and their strategies in multi-scale governance of wind turbine conflict within forests
  11. Rosa
  12. The role of belief in a just world for (dis)honest behavior
  13. Assessing the contribution of products to the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals: a methodological proposal
  14. Biodegradability of Antineoplastic Compounds in Screening Tests
  15. Becoming-Environmental
  16. Why does repatriate career success vary?
  17. Modification of the Lipid Profile of the Initial Oral Biofilm In Situ Using Linseed Oil as Mouthwash
  18. Existenzgründungsberatung
  19. Der Schwingung zum Trotz
  20. Maulwurf
  21. Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty: Being-in-the-world with others?
  22. Ecosystem decay exacerbates biodiversity loss with habitat loss
  23. Existenzgründung
  24. A bait-and-switch model of corporate social responsibility
  25. What difference a "pre" makes: University business preincubators in Germany
  26. Evaluation beruflicher Kompetenzentwicklung in der Erzieherausbildung
  27. Demographischer Wandel und Daseinsgrundfunktionen
  28. The fantasy of the organizational One
  29. Tierschutz in der Verfassung und was nun?
  30. The Right to Consular Assistance Under International Law
  31. An aesthetics of displacement
  32. Apologies and Corpus Pragmatics
  33. An Bildern denken
  34. The Meaning of Natality – Doğumluluğun Anlami
  35. Doppelpräsentationen und mathematische Begabung im Grundschulalter
  36. Communications about uncertainty in scientific climate-related findings
  37. D'une coopération. [About a Cooperation]
  38. Arno Schmidt
  39. Silvio Huonder
  40. Stanislaw Przybyszewski: De profundis und andere Dichtungen