The Exilic Classroom: Spaces of Subversion

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Exilic Classroom : Spaces of Subversion. / Brogan, Andrew.

In: Journal of Philosophy of Education, Vol. 51, No. 2, 01.05.2017, p. 510-523.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Brogan A. The Exilic Classroom: Spaces of Subversion. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2017 May 1;51(2):510-523. doi: 10.1111/1467-9752.12243

Bibtex

@article{7afdf98cf97f4fd1b681a102c44e2d27,
title = "The Exilic Classroom: Spaces of Subversion",
abstract = "This paper explores the possibility of the classroom as an exilic space of subversion in which we can pursue anarchist notions of personal transformation, relationships and society. Classroom environments in higher education institutions in Britain, particularly following the introduction of the Teaching Excellence Framework in September 2016, are premised upon relationships shaped by specific external standards: Employability, the instrumental pursuit of degrees, provider/consumer exchange, among others. Any notions of personal transformation are economic, and the broader goal is the pursuit of economic gain for individual, company and country. In an act of subversion of these external standards, I propose theorising the classroom as an exilic space: a temporally and spatially bracketed space in which participants and their relationships are not beholden to these various external referents. Instead, I put forward the exilic classroom as an anarchic space in which the interactions of the participants are not pre-defined but are formed in the process of the interactions themselves. In theorising the exilic classroom I draw on the work of Obika Gray, and push his notion of exilic space further by integrating the works of Michel de Certeau, Jamie Heckert and Gustav Landauer to help propose a classroom defined as a positive subversive everyday space that is not bound by its opposition to wider structures. The creation of such an exilic classroom assists the participants in stepping out of their expected roles as {\textquoteleft}provider{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}consumer{\textquoteright}, or {\textquoteleft}teacher{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}student{\textquoteright}, and allows the creation of a space of possibilities for our relationships",
keywords = "Educational science, Higher Education, REF, Politics, Anarchism, de Certeau",
author = "Andrew Brogan",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 The Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.",
year = "2017",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1467-9752.12243",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "510--523",
journal = "Journal of Philosophy of Education",
issn = "0309-8249",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Exilic Classroom

T2 - Spaces of Subversion

AU - Brogan, Andrew

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 The Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - This paper explores the possibility of the classroom as an exilic space of subversion in which we can pursue anarchist notions of personal transformation, relationships and society. Classroom environments in higher education institutions in Britain, particularly following the introduction of the Teaching Excellence Framework in September 2016, are premised upon relationships shaped by specific external standards: Employability, the instrumental pursuit of degrees, provider/consumer exchange, among others. Any notions of personal transformation are economic, and the broader goal is the pursuit of economic gain for individual, company and country. In an act of subversion of these external standards, I propose theorising the classroom as an exilic space: a temporally and spatially bracketed space in which participants and their relationships are not beholden to these various external referents. Instead, I put forward the exilic classroom as an anarchic space in which the interactions of the participants are not pre-defined but are formed in the process of the interactions themselves. In theorising the exilic classroom I draw on the work of Obika Gray, and push his notion of exilic space further by integrating the works of Michel de Certeau, Jamie Heckert and Gustav Landauer to help propose a classroom defined as a positive subversive everyday space that is not bound by its opposition to wider structures. The creation of such an exilic classroom assists the participants in stepping out of their expected roles as ‘provider’ and ‘consumer’, or ‘teacher’ and ‘student’, and allows the creation of a space of possibilities for our relationships

AB - This paper explores the possibility of the classroom as an exilic space of subversion in which we can pursue anarchist notions of personal transformation, relationships and society. Classroom environments in higher education institutions in Britain, particularly following the introduction of the Teaching Excellence Framework in September 2016, are premised upon relationships shaped by specific external standards: Employability, the instrumental pursuit of degrees, provider/consumer exchange, among others. Any notions of personal transformation are economic, and the broader goal is the pursuit of economic gain for individual, company and country. In an act of subversion of these external standards, I propose theorising the classroom as an exilic space: a temporally and spatially bracketed space in which participants and their relationships are not beholden to these various external referents. Instead, I put forward the exilic classroom as an anarchic space in which the interactions of the participants are not pre-defined but are formed in the process of the interactions themselves. In theorising the exilic classroom I draw on the work of Obika Gray, and push his notion of exilic space further by integrating the works of Michel de Certeau, Jamie Heckert and Gustav Landauer to help propose a classroom defined as a positive subversive everyday space that is not bound by its opposition to wider structures. The creation of such an exilic classroom assists the participants in stepping out of their expected roles as ‘provider’ and ‘consumer’, or ‘teacher’ and ‘student’, and allows the creation of a space of possibilities for our relationships

KW - Educational science

KW - Higher Education

KW - REF

KW - Politics

KW - Anarchism

KW - de Certeau

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018543673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/90886b21-b29f-3569-9d9c-d8e3bf5b3157/

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9752.12243

DO - 10.1111/1467-9752.12243

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 51

SP - 510

EP - 523

JO - Journal of Philosophy of Education

JF - Journal of Philosophy of Education

SN - 0309-8249

IS - 2

ER -

DOI