1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publications
  5. The coexistence of amenity and biodivers...
  6. Output formats
  7. //

The coexistence of amenity and biodiversity in urban landscapes

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Standard

The coexistence of amenity and biodiversity in urban landscapes. / Ives, Christopher D.; Kelly, Andrew H.
In: Landscape Research, Vol. 41, No. 5, 03.07.2016, p. 495-509.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Ives, CD & Kelly, AH 2016, 'The coexistence of amenity and biodiversity in urban landscapes', Landscape Research, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 495-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2015.1081161

APA

Ives, C. D., & Kelly, A. H. (2016). The coexistence of amenity and biodiversity in urban landscapes. Landscape Research, 41(5), 495-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2015.1081161

Vancouver

Ives CD, Kelly AH. The coexistence of amenity and biodiversity in urban landscapes. Landscape Research. 2016 Jul 3;41(5):495-509. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2015.1081161

Bibtex

@article{892c7d4c8f78407880831b707836f77d,
title = "The coexistence of amenity and biodiversity in urban landscapes",
abstract = "Amenity is a long-standing component of town planning and municipal governance. Biodiversity is a far more recent concept, yet interpreting the conservation mandate in a local context is a significant challenge for landscape and urban planners. This article explores the concepts of amenity and biodiversity and investigates their compatibility in an urbanising world. Their historical expression in law and urban planning is considered, and empirical research on the links between human well-being, green environments and biodiversity is reviewed. We argue that amenity is an underutilised vehicle for achieving biodiversity goals in line with new urban greening paradigms because of its long-standing currency with planning professionals. However, conflict between biodiversity and amenity can arise in practice, depending on a city{\textquoteright}s social–ecological context. These challenges can be overcome through setting clear objectives, utilising scientific evidence, engaging with local communities and ensuring landscape policy is sufficiently flexible to accommodate local needs and characteristics.",
keywords = "amenity, Biodiversity, conservation, landscape aesthetics, local government, planning, Environmental planning",
author = "Ives, {Christopher D.} and Kelly, {Andrew H.}",
year = "2016",
month = jul,
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/01426397.2015.1081161",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "495--509",
journal = "Landscape Research",
issn = "0142-6397",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The coexistence of amenity and biodiversity in urban landscapes

AU - Ives, Christopher D.

AU - Kelly, Andrew H.

PY - 2016/7/3

Y1 - 2016/7/3

N2 - Amenity is a long-standing component of town planning and municipal governance. Biodiversity is a far more recent concept, yet interpreting the conservation mandate in a local context is a significant challenge for landscape and urban planners. This article explores the concepts of amenity and biodiversity and investigates their compatibility in an urbanising world. Their historical expression in law and urban planning is considered, and empirical research on the links between human well-being, green environments and biodiversity is reviewed. We argue that amenity is an underutilised vehicle for achieving biodiversity goals in line with new urban greening paradigms because of its long-standing currency with planning professionals. However, conflict between biodiversity and amenity can arise in practice, depending on a city’s social–ecological context. These challenges can be overcome through setting clear objectives, utilising scientific evidence, engaging with local communities and ensuring landscape policy is sufficiently flexible to accommodate local needs and characteristics.

AB - Amenity is a long-standing component of town planning and municipal governance. Biodiversity is a far more recent concept, yet interpreting the conservation mandate in a local context is a significant challenge for landscape and urban planners. This article explores the concepts of amenity and biodiversity and investigates their compatibility in an urbanising world. Their historical expression in law and urban planning is considered, and empirical research on the links between human well-being, green environments and biodiversity is reviewed. We argue that amenity is an underutilised vehicle for achieving biodiversity goals in line with new urban greening paradigms because of its long-standing currency with planning professionals. However, conflict between biodiversity and amenity can arise in practice, depending on a city’s social–ecological context. These challenges can be overcome through setting clear objectives, utilising scientific evidence, engaging with local communities and ensuring landscape policy is sufficiently flexible to accommodate local needs and characteristics.

KW - amenity

KW - Biodiversity

KW - conservation

KW - landscape aesthetics

KW - local government

KW - planning

KW - Environmental planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944937585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01426397.2015.1081161

DO - 10.1080/01426397.2015.1081161

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84944937585

VL - 41

SP - 495

EP - 509

JO - Landscape Research

JF - Landscape Research

SN - 0142-6397

IS - 5

ER -

Related by journal

Integrating sense of place into participatory landscape planning: merging mapping surveys and geodesign workshops

Gottwald, S., Brenner, J., Albert, C. & Janssen, R., 17.11.2021, In: Landscape Research. 46, 8, p. 1041-1056 16 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Other publications by the same author(s)

Leverage points for sustainability transformation: a review on interventions in food and energy systems

Dorninger, C., Abson, D. J., Apetrei, C. I., Derwort, P., Ives, C. D., Klaniecki, K., Lam, D., Langsenlehner, M., Riechers, M., Spittler, N. & von Wehrden, H., 01.05.2020, In: Ecological Economics. 171, 9 p., 106570.

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth: Visions of future systems and how to get there

Fazey, I., Schäpke, N., Caniglia, G., Hodgson, A., Kendrick, I., Lyon, C., Page, G., Patterson, J., Riedy, C., Strasser, T., Verveen, S., Adams, D., Goldstein, B., Klaes, M., Leicester, G., Linyard, A., McCurdy, A., Ryan, P., Sharpe, B., Silvestri, G., Abdurrahim, A. Y., Abson, D., Adetunji, O. S., Aldunce, P., Alvarez-Pereira, C., Amparo, J. M., Amundsen, H., Anderson, L., Andersson, L., Asquith, M., Augenstein, K., Barrie, J., Bent, D., Bentz, J., Bergsten, A., Berzonsky, C., Bina, O., Blackstock, K., Boehnert, J., Bradbury, H., Brand, C., Böhme, J., Bøjer, M. M., Carmen, E., Charli-Joseph, L., Choudhury, S., Chunhachoti-ananta, S., Cockburn, J., Colvin, J., Connon, I. L. C., Cornforth, R., Cox, R. S., Cradock-Henry, N., Cramer, L., Cremaschi, A., Dannevig, H., Day, C. T., de Lima Hutchison, C., de Vrieze, A., Desai, V., Dolley, J., Duckett, D., Durrant, R. A., Egermann, M., Elsner (Adams), E., Fremantle, C., Fullwood-Thomas, J., Galafassi, D., Gobby, J., Golland, A., González-Padrón, S. K., Gram-Hanssen, I., Grandin, J., Grenni, S., Lauren Gunnell, J., Gusmao, F., Hamann, M., Harding, B., Harper, G., Hesselgren, M., Hestad, D., Heykoop, C. A., Holmén, J., Holstead, K., Hoolohan, C., Horcea-Milcu, A. I., Horlings, L. G., Howden, S. M., Howell, R. A., Huque, S. I., Inturias Canedo, M. L., Iro, C. Y., Ives, C. D., John, B., Joshi, R., Juarez-Bourke, S., Juma, D. W., Karlsen, B. C., Kliem, L., Kläy, A., Kuenkel, P., Kunze, I., Lam, D., Lang, D. J., Larkin, A., Light, A., Luederitz, C., Luthe, T., Maguire, C., Mahecha-Groot, A. M., Malcolm, J., Marshall, F., Maru, Y., McLachlan, C., Mmbando, P., Mohapatra, S., Moore, M. L., Moriggi, A., Morley-Fletcher, M., Moser, S., Mueller, K. M., Mukute, M., Mühlemeier, S., Naess, L. O., Nieto-Romero, M., Novo, P., ÓBrien, K., O'Connell, D. A., O'Donnell, K., Olsson, P., Pearson, K. R., Pereira, L., Petridis, P., Peukert, D., Phear, N., Pisters, S. R., Polsky, M., Pound, D., Preiser, R., Rahman, M. S., Reed, M. S., Revell, P., Rodriguez, I., Rogers, B. C., Rohr, J., Nordbø Rosenberg, M., Ross, H., Russell, S., Ryan, M., Saha, P., Schleicher, K., Schneider, F., Scoville-Simonds, M., Searle, B., Sebhatu, S. P., Sesana, E., Silverman, H., Singh, C., Sterling, E., Stewart, S. J., Tàbara, J. D., Taylor, D., Thornton, P., Tribaldos, T. M., Tschakert, P., Uribe-Calvo, N., Waddell, S., Waddock, S., van der Merwe, L., van Mierlo, B., van Zwanenberg, P., Velarde, S. J., Washbourne, C. L., Waylen, K., Weiser, A., Wight, I., Williams, S., Woods, M., Wolstenholme, R., Wright, N., Wunder, S., Wyllie, A. & Young, H. R., 01.12.2020, In: Energy Research and Social Science. 70, 18 p., 101724.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Inside-out sustainability: The neglect of inner worlds

Ives, C. D., Freeth, R. & Fischer, J., 01.01.2020, In: Ambio. 49, 1, p. 208-217 10 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Loving the mess: navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability

Kenter, J. O., Raymond, C. M., van Riper, C. J., Azzopardi, E., Brear, M. R., Calcagni, F., Christie, I., Christie, M., Fordham, A., Gould, R. K., Ives, C. D., Hejnowicz, A. P., Gunton, R., Horcea-Milcu, A. I., Kendal, D., Kronenberg, J., Massenberg, J. R., O’Connor, S., Ravenscroft, N., Rawluk, A., Raymond, I. J., Rodríguez-Morales, J. & Thankappan, S., 02.09.2019, In: Sustainability Science. 14, 5, p. 1439-1461 23 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Reconnecting with nature for sustainability

Ives, C. D., Abson, D. J., von Wehrden, H., Dorninger, C., Klaniecki, K. & Fischer, J., 01.09.2018, In: Sustainability Science. 13, 5, p. 1389-1397 9 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

DOI