The abuse of executive powers: what remedies?

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksContributions to collected editions/anthologiesResearch

Standard

The abuse of executive powers: what remedies? / Tams, Christian J.
Counterterrorism: Democracy's Challenge. ed. / Andrea Bianchi; Alexis Keller. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008. p. 313-334 (Studies in International Law).

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksContributions to collected editions/anthologiesResearch

Harvard

Tams, CJ 2008, The abuse of executive powers: what remedies? in A Bianchi & A Keller (eds), Counterterrorism: Democracy's Challenge. Studies in International Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp. 313-334.

APA

Tams, C. J. (2008). The abuse of executive powers: what remedies? In A. Bianchi, & A. Keller (Eds.), Counterterrorism: Democracy's Challenge (pp. 313-334). (Studies in International Law). Hart Publishing.

Vancouver

Tams CJ. The abuse of executive powers: what remedies? In Bianchi A, Keller A, editors, Counterterrorism: Democracy's Challenge. Oxford: Hart Publishing. 2008. p. 313-334. (Studies in International Law).

Bibtex

@inbook{a6cce2debee643da99d37fc2ddf3eac6,
title = "The abuse of executive powers: what remedies?",
abstract = "This paper addresses remedies available to victims of illegal counter-terrorist measures adopted by States. It focuses on judicial remedies and outlines the legal parameters governing recourse to three types of institutions: (i) national courts of the State responsible for the violation; (ii) national courts of other States; and (iii) international (quasi-)judicial bodies, notably human rights courts. It shows that in proceedings before their national courts, States responsible for violations have frequently ignored the victims' human rights to remedies (whether in the form of apologies, compensation or criminal prosecution of perpetrators). Proceedings before foreign national courts, in turn, face considerable obstacles, notably issues of jurisdiction and immunity. While these do not arise in international proceedings, these proceedings are typically dependent on the prior exhaustion of local remedies; what is more, they are time-consuming and often do not lead to binding legal decisions. As a consequence, most victims of human rights abuses committed as part of counter-terrorist operations have not been able to obtain any remedy. This worrying tendency reflects the limited acceptance, in practice, of the international right to a remedy.",
keywords = "Law",
author = "Tams, {Christian J.}",
year = "2008",
month = jul,
day = "30",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781841138183",
series = "Studies in International Law",
publisher = "Hart Publishing",
pages = "313--334",
editor = "Andrea Bianchi and Keller, { Alexis}",
booktitle = "Counterterrorism",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - The abuse of executive powers

T2 - what remedies?

AU - Tams, Christian J.

PY - 2008/7/30

Y1 - 2008/7/30

N2 - This paper addresses remedies available to victims of illegal counter-terrorist measures adopted by States. It focuses on judicial remedies and outlines the legal parameters governing recourse to three types of institutions: (i) national courts of the State responsible for the violation; (ii) national courts of other States; and (iii) international (quasi-)judicial bodies, notably human rights courts. It shows that in proceedings before their national courts, States responsible for violations have frequently ignored the victims' human rights to remedies (whether in the form of apologies, compensation or criminal prosecution of perpetrators). Proceedings before foreign national courts, in turn, face considerable obstacles, notably issues of jurisdiction and immunity. While these do not arise in international proceedings, these proceedings are typically dependent on the prior exhaustion of local remedies; what is more, they are time-consuming and often do not lead to binding legal decisions. As a consequence, most victims of human rights abuses committed as part of counter-terrorist operations have not been able to obtain any remedy. This worrying tendency reflects the limited acceptance, in practice, of the international right to a remedy.

AB - This paper addresses remedies available to victims of illegal counter-terrorist measures adopted by States. It focuses on judicial remedies and outlines the legal parameters governing recourse to three types of institutions: (i) national courts of the State responsible for the violation; (ii) national courts of other States; and (iii) international (quasi-)judicial bodies, notably human rights courts. It shows that in proceedings before their national courts, States responsible for violations have frequently ignored the victims' human rights to remedies (whether in the form of apologies, compensation or criminal prosecution of perpetrators). Proceedings before foreign national courts, in turn, face considerable obstacles, notably issues of jurisdiction and immunity. While these do not arise in international proceedings, these proceedings are typically dependent on the prior exhaustion of local remedies; what is more, they are time-consuming and often do not lead to binding legal decisions. As a consequence, most victims of human rights abuses committed as part of counter-terrorist operations have not been able to obtain any remedy. This worrying tendency reflects the limited acceptance, in practice, of the international right to a remedy.

KW - Law

UR - https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/counterterrorism-democracys-challenge-9781841138183/

M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies

SN - 9781841138183

T3 - Studies in International Law

SP - 313

EP - 334

BT - Counterterrorism

A2 - Bianchi, Andrea

A2 - Keller, Alexis

PB - Hart Publishing

CY - Oxford

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Dokumentation der Befragungsinstrumente der Interventionsstudie im Projekt „Conditions and Consequences of Classroom Assessment“ (Co²CA)
  2. Balkans, global migration, ethnic conflict, and class struggle
  3. Between the Ends of a Wire
  4. Inkorporationskunst
  5. COPERNICUS in Lüneburg
  6. "Inability to pay"
  7. 1968
  8. Patterns of organizational (sub)culture and their influence on organizational effectiveness
  9. Sustainable Entrepreneurship
  10. Religiöses Coping
  11. Ein neuer Klassenkampf?
  12. »Widerspruch«
  13. Medienidentitäten
  14. Prevalence of depression in cancer patients
  15. Moirés, Andreas Fogarasi, Katya Sander, Urtica
  16. The Giant Hummingbird (Patagona gigas) in the mountains of central Argentina and a climatic envelope model for its distribution
  17. Ein paar Walzerschritte zu Haffners Ehren
  18. Metamorphosis of ruins
  19. Patientenautonomie im Strafrecht
  20. The Legal Dimensions of Rule of Law Promotion in EU Foreign Policy:
  21. Life Cycle and Supply Chain Information in Environmental Management Accounting
  22. Kulturland Brandenburg
  23. Bestrafung und Resozialisierung?
  24. Cabinet Reshuffles in Parliamentary Democracies
  25. Gender-Rituale in der Mobilkommunikation von Jugendlichen
  26. Is less more? Investigating citizen and consumer preferences for the future direction of livestock farming policy
  27. Das homosexuelle Begehren
  28. Empirical Implications for Promoting Students "Entrepreneurial Intentions"
  29. Sustainability management accounting – enabling macro-level sustainability transformation towards the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
  30. Contradictions in German Penal Practices
  31. Die Poetisierung stummer Traumbilder
  32. Kommunikative Konstitution von Organisationen
  33. Unterrichtsdiagnostik – Voraussetzung für die Verbesserung der Unterrichtsqualität
  34. Die Eigenverbrauchsregelung in § 33 Abs. 2 EEG nach der Photovoltaik-Novelle 2010
  35. The post-entry performance of new small firms in German manufacturing-industries
  36. Kinetic and Stoichiometric Modeling-Based Analysis of Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) Production Potential by Crypthecodinium cohnii from Glycerol, Glucose and Ethanol