Technological opportunities and their rejection: A process perspective on organizational lock-in

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksContributions to collected editions/anthologiesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Technological opportunities and their rejection: A process perspective on organizational lock-in. / Rothmann, Wasko; Wenzel, Matthias; Wagner, Heinz Theo.
Technological Innovation Networks: Collaboration and Partnership. ed. / Ring Ran; Penn State Harrisburg. Information Age Publishing, 2017. p. 75-97.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksContributions to collected editions/anthologiesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Rothmann, W, Wenzel, M & Wagner, HT 2017, Technological opportunities and their rejection: A process perspective on organizational lock-in. in R Ran & PS Harrisburg (eds), Technological Innovation Networks: Collaboration and Partnership. Information Age Publishing, pp. 75-97.

APA

Rothmann, W., Wenzel, M., & Wagner, H. T. (2017). Technological opportunities and their rejection: A process perspective on organizational lock-in. In R. Ran, & P. S. Harrisburg (Eds.), Technological Innovation Networks: Collaboration and Partnership (pp. 75-97). Information Age Publishing.

Vancouver

Rothmann W, Wenzel M, Wagner HT. Technological opportunities and their rejection: A process perspective on organizational lock-in. In Ran R, Harrisburg PS, editors, Technological Innovation Networks: Collaboration and Partnership. Information Age Publishing. 2017. p. 75-97

Bibtex

@inbook{4e7c9697162344ff82fca1ea4308d32d,
title = "Technological opportunities and their rejection: A process perspective on organizational lock-in",
abstract = "In this chapter, we add to the contemporary debate on path dependence in the management literature by examining how the scope of action evolves in lock-ins. For this purpose, we draw on qualitative data of the German newspaper industry from 1995 to date. Our study indicates that the scope of action in lock-ins continuously changes as new technological opportunities emerge and disappear. Our results also suggest that path-dependent firms have windows of opportunity available that remain unexploited due to cognitive and normative barriers. Furthermore, our empirical evidence indicates that although windows of opportunity may temporarily close, the scope of action reopens when further technological opportunities emerge. Our study contributes to a better understanding of lock-ins as an underresearched phase of path dependence, provides a more comprehensive process understanding for the inability of path-dependent firms to exploit technological opportunities, and offers practical implications on how path-dependent firms may leave their path.",
keywords = "Management studies",
author = "Wasko Rothmann and Matthias Wenzel and Wagner, {Heinz Theo}",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781681238586",
pages = "75--97",
editor = "Ring Ran and Harrisburg, {Penn State}",
booktitle = "Technological Innovation Networks",
publisher = "Information Age Publishing",
address = "United States",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Technological opportunities and their rejection

T2 - A process perspective on organizational lock-in

AU - Rothmann, Wasko

AU - Wenzel, Matthias

AU - Wagner, Heinz Theo

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - In this chapter, we add to the contemporary debate on path dependence in the management literature by examining how the scope of action evolves in lock-ins. For this purpose, we draw on qualitative data of the German newspaper industry from 1995 to date. Our study indicates that the scope of action in lock-ins continuously changes as new technological opportunities emerge and disappear. Our results also suggest that path-dependent firms have windows of opportunity available that remain unexploited due to cognitive and normative barriers. Furthermore, our empirical evidence indicates that although windows of opportunity may temporarily close, the scope of action reopens when further technological opportunities emerge. Our study contributes to a better understanding of lock-ins as an underresearched phase of path dependence, provides a more comprehensive process understanding for the inability of path-dependent firms to exploit technological opportunities, and offers practical implications on how path-dependent firms may leave their path.

AB - In this chapter, we add to the contemporary debate on path dependence in the management literature by examining how the scope of action evolves in lock-ins. For this purpose, we draw on qualitative data of the German newspaper industry from 1995 to date. Our study indicates that the scope of action in lock-ins continuously changes as new technological opportunities emerge and disappear. Our results also suggest that path-dependent firms have windows of opportunity available that remain unexploited due to cognitive and normative barriers. Furthermore, our empirical evidence indicates that although windows of opportunity may temporarily close, the scope of action reopens when further technological opportunities emerge. Our study contributes to a better understanding of lock-ins as an underresearched phase of path dependence, provides a more comprehensive process understanding for the inability of path-dependent firms to exploit technological opportunities, and offers practical implications on how path-dependent firms may leave their path.

KW - Management studies

UR - https://www.infoagepub.com/products/Technological-Innovation-Networks

M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies

SN - 9781681238586

SN - 9781681238593

SP - 75

EP - 97

BT - Technological Innovation Networks

A2 - Ran, Ring

A2 - Harrisburg, Penn State

PB - Information Age Publishing

ER -