Sustainable development indicators: Conceptual frameworks of comparative indicators sets for local administrations in Japan
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Sustainable Development, Vol. 26, No. 6, 01.11.2018, p. 683-690.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Sustainable development indicators
T2 - Conceptual frameworks of comparative indicators sets for local administrations in Japan
AU - Hatakeyama, Takehiro
PY - 2018/11/1
Y1 - 2018/11/1
N2 - Comparative indicators, with which local governments monitor and evaluate policy progress, help effective implementation of public policy toward sustainable development (SD). However, such policy tools have been less developed at the local level. This study proposes conceptual frameworks of sustainable development indicators (SDIs) taking Japanese municipal governments as examples. The results illustrated five SDIs thereby indicating four approaches, and highlighted the most feasible and optimal frameworks. The former, supported by the vast majority of local governments, had a strong predilection for socioeconomic policies while disregarding environmental aspects despite their holistic aim, reflecting the current trend of sustainability at the local level in Japan. In contrast, the latter tended to encompass three dimensions of SD in a balanced manner, focusing largely on well-being. Hence, this framework helped complement the lack of environmental orientation and potentially maintain the consistency of public policy.
AB - Comparative indicators, with which local governments monitor and evaluate policy progress, help effective implementation of public policy toward sustainable development (SD). However, such policy tools have been less developed at the local level. This study proposes conceptual frameworks of sustainable development indicators (SDIs) taking Japanese municipal governments as examples. The results illustrated five SDIs thereby indicating four approaches, and highlighted the most feasible and optimal frameworks. The former, supported by the vast majority of local governments, had a strong predilection for socioeconomic policies while disregarding environmental aspects despite their holistic aim, reflecting the current trend of sustainability at the local level in Japan. In contrast, the latter tended to encompass three dimensions of SD in a balanced manner, focusing largely on well-being. Hence, this framework helped complement the lack of environmental orientation and potentially maintain the consistency of public policy.
KW - Comparative indicators
KW - Japan
KW - Municipality
KW - Public policy
KW - Sustainability policy
KW - Sustainable city
KW - Sustainable development indicators
KW - Sustainability Science
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045396121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/sd.1738
DO - 10.1002/sd.1738
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85045396121
VL - 26
SP - 683
EP - 690
JO - Sustainable Development
JF - Sustainable Development
SN - 0968-0802
IS - 6
ER -