Resilience in ecology: Abstraction, distraction, or where the action is?

Rachel J. Standish; Richard J. Hobbs; Margaret Mayfield; Brandon T. Bestelmeyer; Katherine N. Suding; Loretta L. Battaglia; Valerie Eviner; Christine V. Hawkes; Victoria Martine Temperton; Viki A. Cramer; James Harris; Jennifer L. Funk; Peter A. Thomas

doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.008

Resilience in ecology: Abstraction, distraction, or where the action is?

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Standard

Resilience in ecology: Abstraction, distraction, or where the action is? / Standish, Rachel J.; Hobbs, Richard J.; Mayfield, Margaret et al.
In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 177, 09.2014, p. 43-51.

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Harvard

Standish, RJ, Hobbs, RJ, Mayfield, M, Bestelmeyer, BT, Suding, KN, Battaglia, LL, Eviner, V, Hawkes, CV, Temperton, VM, Cramer, VA, Harris, J, Funk, JL & Thomas, PA 2014, 'Resilience in ecology: Abstraction, distraction, or where the action is?', Biological Conservation, vol. 177, pp. 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.008

APA

Standish, R. J., Hobbs, R. J., Mayfield, M., Bestelmeyer, B. T., Suding, K. N., Battaglia, L. L., Eviner, V., Hawkes, C. V., Temperton, V. M., Cramer, V. A., Harris, J., Funk, J. L., & Thomas, P. A. (2014). Resilience in ecology: Abstraction, distraction, or where the action is? Biological Conservation, 177, 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.008

Vancouver

Standish RJ, Hobbs RJ, Mayfield M, Bestelmeyer BT, Suding KN, Battaglia LL et al. Resilience in ecology: Abstraction, distraction, or where the action is? Biological Conservation. 2014 Sept;177:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.008

Bibtex

@article{afb9c533e65142b8b0d83faedee01d1a,

title = "Resilience in ecology: Abstraction, distraction, or where the action is?",

abstract = "Increasingly, the success of management interventions aimed at biodiversity conservation are viewed as being dependent on the {\textquoteleft}resilience{\textquoteright} of the system. Although the term {\textquoteleft}resilience{\textquoteright} is increasingly used by policy makers and environmental managers, the concept of {\textquoteleft}resilience{\textquoteright} remains vague, varied and difficult to quantify. Here we clarify what this concept means from an ecological perspective, and how it can be measured and applied to ecosystem management. We argue that thresholds of disturbance are central tomeasuring resilience. Thresholds are important because they offer a means to quantify how much disturbance an ecosystem can absorb before switching to another state, and so indicate whether intervention might be necessary to promote the recovery of the pre-disturbance state. We distinguish between helpful resilience, where resilience helps recovery, and unhelpful resilience where it does not, signalling the presence of a threshold and the need for intervention. Data to determine thresholds are not always availableand so we consider the potential for indices of functional diversity to act as proxy measures of resilience.We also consider the contributions of connectivity and scale to resilience and how to incorporate these factors into management. We argue that linking thresholds to functional diversity indices may improve our ability to predict the resilience of ecosystems to future, potentially novel, disturbances according totheir spatial and temporal scales of influence. Throughout, we provide guidance for the application of the resilience concept to ecosystem management. In doing so, we confirm its usefulness for improving biodiversity conservation in our rapidly changing world.",

keywords = "Ecosystems Research, Biodiversity conservation, Ecological resilience, Environmental Policy, Recovery, Restoration goals, Thresholding, Biology, Sustainability Science",

author = "Standish, {Rachel J.} and Hobbs, {Richard J.} and Margaret Mayfield and Bestelmeyer, {Brandon T.} and Suding, {Katherine N.} and Battaglia, {Loretta L.} and Valerie Eviner and Hawkes, {Christine V.} and Temperton, {Victoria Martine} and Cramer, {Viki A.} and James Harris and Funk, {Jennifer L.} and Thomas, {Peter A.}",

year = "2014",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.008",

language = "English",

volume = "177",

pages = "43--51",

journal = "Biological Conservation",

issn = "0006-3207",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resilience in ecology

T2 - Abstraction, distraction, or where the action is?

AU - Standish, Rachel J.

AU - Hobbs, Richard J.

AU - Mayfield, Margaret

AU - Bestelmeyer, Brandon T.

AU - Suding, Katherine N.

AU - Battaglia, Loretta L.

AU - Eviner, Valerie

AU - Hawkes, Christine V.

AU - Temperton, Victoria Martine

AU - Cramer, Viki A.

AU - Harris, James

AU - Funk, Jennifer L.

AU - Thomas, Peter A.

PY - 2014/9

Y1 - 2014/9

N2 - Increasingly, the success of management interventions aimed at biodiversity conservation are viewed as being dependent on the ‘resilience’ of the system. Although the term ‘resilience’ is increasingly used by policy makers and environmental managers, the concept of ‘resilience’ remains vague, varied and difficult to quantify. Here we clarify what this concept means from an ecological perspective, and how it can be measured and applied to ecosystem management. We argue that thresholds of disturbance are central tomeasuring resilience. Thresholds are important because they offer a means to quantify how much disturbance an ecosystem can absorb before switching to another state, and so indicate whether intervention might be necessary to promote the recovery of the pre-disturbance state. We distinguish between helpful resilience, where resilience helps recovery, and unhelpful resilience where it does not, signalling the presence of a threshold and the need for intervention. Data to determine thresholds are not always availableand so we consider the potential for indices of functional diversity to act as proxy measures of resilience.We also consider the contributions of connectivity and scale to resilience and how to incorporate these factors into management. We argue that linking thresholds to functional diversity indices may improve our ability to predict the resilience of ecosystems to future, potentially novel, disturbances according totheir spatial and temporal scales of influence. Throughout, we provide guidance for the application of the resilience concept to ecosystem management. In doing so, we confirm its usefulness for improving biodiversity conservation in our rapidly changing world.

AB - Increasingly, the success of management interventions aimed at biodiversity conservation are viewed as being dependent on the ‘resilience’ of the system. Although the term ‘resilience’ is increasingly used by policy makers and environmental managers, the concept of ‘resilience’ remains vague, varied and difficult to quantify. Here we clarify what this concept means from an ecological perspective, and how it can be measured and applied to ecosystem management. We argue that thresholds of disturbance are central tomeasuring resilience. Thresholds are important because they offer a means to quantify how much disturbance an ecosystem can absorb before switching to another state, and so indicate whether intervention might be necessary to promote the recovery of the pre-disturbance state. We distinguish between helpful resilience, where resilience helps recovery, and unhelpful resilience where it does not, signalling the presence of a threshold and the need for intervention. Data to determine thresholds are not always availableand so we consider the potential for indices of functional diversity to act as proxy measures of resilience.We also consider the contributions of connectivity and scale to resilience and how to incorporate these factors into management. We argue that linking thresholds to functional diversity indices may improve our ability to predict the resilience of ecosystems to future, potentially novel, disturbances according totheir spatial and temporal scales of influence. Throughout, we provide guidance for the application of the resilience concept to ecosystem management. In doing so, we confirm its usefulness for improving biodiversity conservation in our rapidly changing world.

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Biodiversity conservation

KW - Ecological resilience

KW - Environmental Policy

KW - Recovery

KW - Restoration goals

KW - Thresholding

KW - Biology

KW - Sustainability Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903784121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/21590bea-f036-360d-bbbf-4f40a0ef631b/

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.008

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.008

M3 - Scientific review articles

VL - 177

SP - 43

EP - 51

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

ER -

Related by journal

Enhancing the transformative potential of interventions for the sustainable use of natural resources

Loos, J., Cortés-Capano, G., Riechers, M., Walsh, C. & Leventon, J., 01.08.2024, In: Biological Conservation. 296, 10 p., 110691.

Research output: Journal contributions › Comments / Debate / Reports › Research

Taking the pulse of Earth's tropical forests using networks of highly distributed plots

Author Collaboration of "Taking the pulse of Earth's tropical forests using networks of highly distributed plots", Blundo, C., Carilla, J., Grau, R., Malizia, A., Malizia, L., Osinaga-Acosta, O., Bird, M., Bradford, M., Catchpole, D., Ford, A., Graham, A. & Klipel, J., 08.2021, In: Biological Conservation. 260, 27 p., 108849.