Release of monomers from four different composite materials after halogen and LED curing

Olga Polydorou; Armin König; Markus Jörg Altenburger; Martin Wolkewitz; Elmar Hellwig; Klaus Kümmerer

Release of monomers from four different composite materials after halogen and LED curing

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Standard

Release of monomers from four different composite materials after halogen and LED curing. / Polydorou, Olga; König, Armin; Altenburger, Markus Jörg et al.
In: American Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 24, No. 5, 01.10.2011, p. 315-321.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Bibtex

@article{f8637300b9b648019e1e133bce8e02db,

title = "Release of monomers from four different composite materials after halogen and LED curing",

abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the release of monomers from four different composite materials (Ceram X, Filtek Supreme XT, Tetric Flow, Tetric EvoCeram), polymerized using either halogen or LED unit. Methods: Ten specimens were made for each material/unit combination. Each specimen was stored in 1 ml 75% ethanol. The storage medium was renewed after 1, 7 and 28 days. Aliquots of this medium were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Results: The effect of the curing unit on monomers' release differed significantly among the materials (P< 0.0001). The amount of BisGMA and TEGDMA released from Ceram X was not influenced by the unit used (P> 0.05). Curing with LED reduced the amount of Bisphenol A released from Ceram X compared to halogen. For Filtek Supreme XT, the type of unit exerted a significant effect on the elution of BisGMA (P< 0.05). LED curing resulted in a higher release of TEGDMA and UDMA compared to halogen (P< 0.05). For Tetric Flow, LED curing resulted in lower monomer release (P< 0.0001). For Tetric EvoCeram, the amounts of BisGMA, UDMA and Bisphenol A were higher when polymerizing with LED compared to halogen. The release of substances was more material dependent and less influenced by the curing unit used.",

keywords = "Chemistry, Sustainability Science",

author = "Olga Polydorou and Armin K{\"o}nig and Altenburger, {Markus J{\"o}rg} and Martin Wolkewitz and Elmar Hellwig and Klaus K{\"u}mmerer",

year = "2011",

month = oct,

day = "1",

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "315--321",

journal = "American Journal of Dentistry",

issn = "0894-8275",

publisher = "Mosher and Linder, Inc",

number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Release of monomers from four different composite materials after halogen and LED curing

AU - Polydorou, Olga

AU - König, Armin

AU - Altenburger, Markus Jörg

AU - Wolkewitz, Martin

AU - Hellwig, Elmar

AU - Kümmerer, Klaus

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the release of monomers from four different composite materials (Ceram X, Filtek Supreme XT, Tetric Flow, Tetric EvoCeram), polymerized using either halogen or LED unit. Methods: Ten specimens were made for each material/unit combination. Each specimen was stored in 1 ml 75% ethanol. The storage medium was renewed after 1, 7 and 28 days. Aliquots of this medium were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Results: The effect of the curing unit on monomers' release differed significantly among the materials (P< 0.0001). The amount of BisGMA and TEGDMA released from Ceram X was not influenced by the unit used (P> 0.05). Curing with LED reduced the amount of Bisphenol A released from Ceram X compared to halogen. For Filtek Supreme XT, the type of unit exerted a significant effect on the elution of BisGMA (P< 0.05). LED curing resulted in a higher release of TEGDMA and UDMA compared to halogen (P< 0.05). For Tetric Flow, LED curing resulted in lower monomer release (P< 0.0001). For Tetric EvoCeram, the amounts of BisGMA, UDMA and Bisphenol A were higher when polymerizing with LED compared to halogen. The release of substances was more material dependent and less influenced by the curing unit used.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the release of monomers from four different composite materials (Ceram X, Filtek Supreme XT, Tetric Flow, Tetric EvoCeram), polymerized using either halogen or LED unit. Methods: Ten specimens were made for each material/unit combination. Each specimen was stored in 1 ml 75% ethanol. The storage medium was renewed after 1, 7 and 28 days. Aliquots of this medium were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Results: The effect of the curing unit on monomers' release differed significantly among the materials (P< 0.0001). The amount of BisGMA and TEGDMA released from Ceram X was not influenced by the unit used (P> 0.05). Curing with LED reduced the amount of Bisphenol A released from Ceram X compared to halogen. For Filtek Supreme XT, the type of unit exerted a significant effect on the elution of BisGMA (P< 0.05). LED curing resulted in a higher release of TEGDMA and UDMA compared to halogen (P< 0.05). For Tetric Flow, LED curing resulted in lower monomer release (P< 0.0001). For Tetric EvoCeram, the amounts of BisGMA, UDMA and Bisphenol A were higher when polymerizing with LED compared to halogen. The release of substances was more material dependent and less influenced by the curing unit used.

KW - Chemistry

KW - Sustainability Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855396257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 22165461

VL - 24

SP - 315

EP - 321

JO - American Journal of Dentistry

JF - American Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0894-8275

IS - 5

ER -

Correction to: Determination and risk assessment of UV filters and benzotriazole UV stabilizers in wastewater from a wastewater treatment plant in Lüneburg, Germany (Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, (2024), 196, 8, (725), 10.1007/s10661-024-12853-2)

Ajibola, A. S., Reich, M. & Kümmerer, K., 11.2024, In: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 196, 11, 1 p., 1095.

Research output: Journal contributions › Comments / Debate / Reports › Research