Psychometric approaches to language testing and linguistic profiling: – A complementary relationship?
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research › peer-review
Standard
Developing, Modelling and Assessing Second Languages: Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching. ed. / Jörg Keßler; Anke Lenzing; Mathias Liebner. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2016. p. 135-162 https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.5.07hag.
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Psychometric approaches to language testing and linguistic profiling
T2 - – A complementary relationship?
AU - Hagenfeld, Katharina
PY - 2016/6/29
Y1 - 2016/6/29
N2 - The present study investigates as to whether and to what extent Linguistic Profiling can complement shortcomings of proficiency rating scales that are based on the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) (CoE 2001). In order to shed light on possible interfaces between the second language acquisition theory Processability Theory (PT) (Pienemann 1998, 2005) and the CEFR, learners were rated according to the CEFR and diagnosed with two linguistic profiling tools: Rapid Profile (Mackey, Pienemann, & Thornton 1991; Pienemann & Mackey 1993; Keßler 2006, 2008) and Autoprofile (Lin 2012). The emergence criterion (Pienemann 1998; Pallotti 2007) as used in PT as the starting point to determine acquisition is highly predictive in nature and thus taken as the point of departure of an integration of PT into the CEFR. The results show correspondences between CEFR levels and PT stages and suggest a reexamination of early CEFR levels in terms of the complexity of operations beginning learners are assumed to manage.
AB - The present study investigates as to whether and to what extent Linguistic Profiling can complement shortcomings of proficiency rating scales that are based on the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) (CoE 2001). In order to shed light on possible interfaces between the second language acquisition theory Processability Theory (PT) (Pienemann 1998, 2005) and the CEFR, learners were rated according to the CEFR and diagnosed with two linguistic profiling tools: Rapid Profile (Mackey, Pienemann, & Thornton 1991; Pienemann & Mackey 1993; Keßler 2006, 2008) and Autoprofile (Lin 2012). The emergence criterion (Pienemann 1998; Pallotti 2007) as used in PT as the starting point to determine acquisition is highly predictive in nature and thus taken as the point of departure of an integration of PT into the CEFR. The results show correspondences between CEFR levels and PT stages and suggest a reexamination of early CEFR levels in terms of the complexity of operations beginning learners are assumed to manage.
KW - Didactics of English as a foreign language
M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies
SN - ISBN 9789027203052
SP - 135
EP - 162
BT - Developing, Modelling and Assessing Second Languages
A2 - Keßler, Jörg
A2 - Lenzing, Anke
A2 - Liebner, Mathias
PB - John Benjamins Publishing Company
ER -