Preventing the onset of major depressive disorder: A meta-analytic review of psychological interventions

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Preventing the onset of major depressive disorder: A meta-analytic review of psychological interventions. / van Zoonen, Kim; Buntrock, Claudia; Ebert, David Daniel et al.
In: International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 43, No. 2, dyt175, 01.04.2014, p. 318-329.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

van Zoonen K, Buntrock C, Ebert DD, Smit F, Reynolds CF, Beekman ATF et al. Preventing the onset of major depressive disorder: A meta-analytic review of psychological interventions. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2014 Apr 1;43(2):318-329. dyt175. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt175

Bibtex

@article{01353dbb198d4349b137b27f53d6108a,
title = "Preventing the onset of major depressive disorder: A meta-analytic review of psychological interventions",
abstract = "BACKGROUND:Depressive disorders are highly prevalent, have a detrimental impact on the quality of life of patients and their relatives and are associated with increased mortality rates, high levels of service use and substantial economic costs. Current treatments are estimated to only reduce about one-third of the disease burden of depressive disorders. Prevention may be an alternative strategy to further reduce the disease burden of depression.METHODS:We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining the effects of preventive interventions in participants with no diagnosed depression at baseline on the incidence of diagnosed depressive disorders at follow-up. We identified 32 studies that met our inclusion criteria.RESULTS:We found that the relative risk of developing a depressive disorder was incidence rate ratio = 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.69-0.91), indicating a 21% decrease in incidence in prevention groups in comparison with control groups. Heterogeneity was low (I(2) = 24%). The number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one new case of depressive disorder was 20. Sensitivity analyses revealed no differences between type of prevention (e.g. selective, indicated or universal) nor between type of intervention (e.g. cognitive behavioural therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy or other). However, data on NNT did show differences.CONCLUSIONS:Prevention of depression seems feasible and may, in addition to treatment, be an effective way to delay or prevent the onset of depressive disorders. Preventing or delaying these disorders may contribute to the further reduction of the disease burden and the economic costs associated with depressive disorders.",
keywords = "Health sciences, depression, prevention, RCT, Psychology",
author = "{van Zoonen}, Kim and Claudia Buntrock and Ebert, {David Daniel} and Filip Smit and Reynolds, {Charles F.} and Beekman, {Aartjan T.F.} and Pim Cuijpers",
year = "2014",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ije/dyt175",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "318--329",
journal = "International Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0300-5771",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preventing the onset of major depressive disorder

T2 - A meta-analytic review of psychological interventions

AU - van Zoonen, Kim

AU - Buntrock, Claudia

AU - Ebert, David Daniel

AU - Smit, Filip

AU - Reynolds, Charles F.

AU - Beekman, Aartjan T.F.

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

PY - 2014/4/1

Y1 - 2014/4/1

N2 - BACKGROUND:Depressive disorders are highly prevalent, have a detrimental impact on the quality of life of patients and their relatives and are associated with increased mortality rates, high levels of service use and substantial economic costs. Current treatments are estimated to only reduce about one-third of the disease burden of depressive disorders. Prevention may be an alternative strategy to further reduce the disease burden of depression.METHODS:We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining the effects of preventive interventions in participants with no diagnosed depression at baseline on the incidence of diagnosed depressive disorders at follow-up. We identified 32 studies that met our inclusion criteria.RESULTS:We found that the relative risk of developing a depressive disorder was incidence rate ratio = 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.69-0.91), indicating a 21% decrease in incidence in prevention groups in comparison with control groups. Heterogeneity was low (I(2) = 24%). The number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one new case of depressive disorder was 20. Sensitivity analyses revealed no differences between type of prevention (e.g. selective, indicated or universal) nor between type of intervention (e.g. cognitive behavioural therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy or other). However, data on NNT did show differences.CONCLUSIONS:Prevention of depression seems feasible and may, in addition to treatment, be an effective way to delay or prevent the onset of depressive disorders. Preventing or delaying these disorders may contribute to the further reduction of the disease burden and the economic costs associated with depressive disorders.

AB - BACKGROUND:Depressive disorders are highly prevalent, have a detrimental impact on the quality of life of patients and their relatives and are associated with increased mortality rates, high levels of service use and substantial economic costs. Current treatments are estimated to only reduce about one-third of the disease burden of depressive disorders. Prevention may be an alternative strategy to further reduce the disease burden of depression.METHODS:We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining the effects of preventive interventions in participants with no diagnosed depression at baseline on the incidence of diagnosed depressive disorders at follow-up. We identified 32 studies that met our inclusion criteria.RESULTS:We found that the relative risk of developing a depressive disorder was incidence rate ratio = 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.69-0.91), indicating a 21% decrease in incidence in prevention groups in comparison with control groups. Heterogeneity was low (I(2) = 24%). The number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one new case of depressive disorder was 20. Sensitivity analyses revealed no differences between type of prevention (e.g. selective, indicated or universal) nor between type of intervention (e.g. cognitive behavioural therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy or other). However, data on NNT did show differences.CONCLUSIONS:Prevention of depression seems feasible and may, in addition to treatment, be an effective way to delay or prevent the onset of depressive disorders. Preventing or delaying these disorders may contribute to the further reduction of the disease burden and the economic costs associated with depressive disorders.

KW - Health sciences

KW - depression

KW - prevention

KW - RCT

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899842288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/9a9591cb-31a8-378c-96e1-07721de630a7/

U2 - 10.1093/ije/dyt175

DO - 10.1093/ije/dyt175

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 24760873

VL - 43

SP - 318

EP - 329

JO - International Journal of Epidemiology

JF - International Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0300-5771

IS - 2

M1 - dyt175

ER -

DOI