Politics without a Proper Locus: Political Agency between Action and Practice
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Chapter › peer-review
Standard
Decolonising Political Concepts. Taylor and Francis Inc., 2023. p. 83-99.
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Chapter › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Politics without a Proper Locus
T2 - Political Agency between Action and Practice
AU - Kohpeiß, Henrike
AU - Wuth, Marie
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 selection and editorial matter, Valentin Clavé-Mercier and Marie Wuth; individual chapters, the contributors.
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - Hannah Arendt’s political theory builds on the notion of action in order to describe individual as well as collective power to intervene in a given order. But Arendt’s specific concept of action comes with a number of assumptions and conditions, which constitute a universalised idea of the human subject as generally rational and striving for political progress. This notion, we argue, cannot account for circumstances of violent domination under which some populations live and therefore runs the risk to exclude these parts of society from the field of political agency Arendt sketches. With this observation, the idea of political agency itself is put under scrutiny and has to be reviewed with regard to alternative concepts. In contrast to Arendt’s vocabulary, Saidiya Hartman’s notion of practice aims to describe human activity under extreme circumstances of undermined autonomy and thereby suggests an altered view on politics, action, and the construction of political subjectivity.
AB - Hannah Arendt’s political theory builds on the notion of action in order to describe individual as well as collective power to intervene in a given order. But Arendt’s specific concept of action comes with a number of assumptions and conditions, which constitute a universalised idea of the human subject as generally rational and striving for political progress. This notion, we argue, cannot account for circumstances of violent domination under which some populations live and therefore runs the risk to exclude these parts of society from the field of political agency Arendt sketches. With this observation, the idea of political agency itself is put under scrutiny and has to be reviewed with regard to alternative concepts. In contrast to Arendt’s vocabulary, Saidiya Hartman’s notion of practice aims to describe human activity under extreme circumstances of undermined autonomy and thereby suggests an altered view on politics, action, and the construction of political subjectivity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178622754&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4324/9781003293460-7
DO - 10.4324/9781003293460-7
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85178622754
SN - 9781032275918
SP - 83
EP - 99
BT - Decolonising Political Concepts
PB - Taylor and Francis Inc.
ER -
