Politics without a Proper Locus: Political Agency between Action and Practice

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Standard

Politics without a Proper Locus: Political Agency between Action and Practice. / Kohpeiß, Henrike; Wuth, Marie.
Decolonising Political Concepts. Taylor and Francis Inc., 2023. S. 83-99.

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Harvard

Kohpeiß, H & Wuth, M 2023, Politics without a Proper Locus: Political Agency between Action and Practice. in Decolonising Political Concepts. Taylor and Francis Inc., S. 83-99. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003293460-7

APA

Kohpeiß, H., & Wuth, M. (2023). Politics without a Proper Locus: Political Agency between Action and Practice. In Decolonising Political Concepts (S. 83-99). Taylor and Francis Inc.. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003293460-7

Vancouver

Kohpeiß H, Wuth M. Politics without a Proper Locus: Political Agency between Action and Practice. in Decolonising Political Concepts. Taylor and Francis Inc. 2023. S. 83-99 doi: 10.4324/9781003293460-7

Bibtex

@inbook{33e26ed902824d9aa7e70a3f232660c6,
title = "Politics without a Proper Locus: Political Agency between Action and Practice",
abstract = "Hannah Arendt{\textquoteright}s political theory builds on the notion of action in order to describe individual as well as collective power to intervene in a given order. But Arendt{\textquoteright}s specific concept of action comes with a number of assumptions and conditions, which constitute a universalised idea of the human subject as generally rational and striving for political progress. This notion, we argue, cannot account for circumstances of violent domination under which some populations live and therefore runs the risk to exclude these parts of society from the field of political agency Arendt sketches. With this observation, the idea of political agency itself is put under scrutiny and has to be reviewed with regard to alternative concepts. In contrast to Arendt{\textquoteright}s vocabulary, Saidiya Hartman{\textquoteright}s notion of practice aims to describe human activity under extreme circumstances of undermined autonomy and thereby suggests an altered view on politics, action, and the construction of political subjectivity.",
author = "Henrike Kohpei{\ss} and Marie Wuth",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 selection and editorial matter, Valentin Clav{\'e}-Mercier and Marie Wuth; individual chapters, the contributors.",
year = "2023",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781003293460-7",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781032275918",
pages = "83--99",
booktitle = "Decolonising Political Concepts",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Inc.",
address = "United States",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Politics without a Proper Locus

T2 - Political Agency between Action and Practice

AU - Kohpeiß, Henrike

AU - Wuth, Marie

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 selection and editorial matter, Valentin Clavé-Mercier and Marie Wuth; individual chapters, the contributors.

PY - 2023/1/1

Y1 - 2023/1/1

N2 - Hannah Arendt’s political theory builds on the notion of action in order to describe individual as well as collective power to intervene in a given order. But Arendt’s specific concept of action comes with a number of assumptions and conditions, which constitute a universalised idea of the human subject as generally rational and striving for political progress. This notion, we argue, cannot account for circumstances of violent domination under which some populations live and therefore runs the risk to exclude these parts of society from the field of political agency Arendt sketches. With this observation, the idea of political agency itself is put under scrutiny and has to be reviewed with regard to alternative concepts. In contrast to Arendt’s vocabulary, Saidiya Hartman’s notion of practice aims to describe human activity under extreme circumstances of undermined autonomy and thereby suggests an altered view on politics, action, and the construction of political subjectivity.

AB - Hannah Arendt’s political theory builds on the notion of action in order to describe individual as well as collective power to intervene in a given order. But Arendt’s specific concept of action comes with a number of assumptions and conditions, which constitute a universalised idea of the human subject as generally rational and striving for political progress. This notion, we argue, cannot account for circumstances of violent domination under which some populations live and therefore runs the risk to exclude these parts of society from the field of political agency Arendt sketches. With this observation, the idea of political agency itself is put under scrutiny and has to be reviewed with regard to alternative concepts. In contrast to Arendt’s vocabulary, Saidiya Hartman’s notion of practice aims to describe human activity under extreme circumstances of undermined autonomy and thereby suggests an altered view on politics, action, and the construction of political subjectivity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178622754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781003293460-7

DO - 10.4324/9781003293460-7

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85178622754

SN - 9781032275918

SP - 83

EP - 99

BT - Decolonising Political Concepts

PB - Taylor and Francis Inc.

ER -

DOI