Phonographic work: Reading and writing sound

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksContributions to collected editions/anthologiesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Phonographic work: Reading and writing sound. / Großmann, Rolf.
Sound as popular culture: a research companion. ed. / Jens Gerrit Papenburg; Holger Schulze. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2016. p. 355-366.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksContributions to collected editions/anthologiesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Großmann, R 2016, Phonographic work: Reading and writing sound. in JG Papenburg & H Schulze (eds), Sound as popular culture: a research companion. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 355-366. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9975.003.0046

APA

Großmann, R. (2016). Phonographic work: Reading and writing sound. In J. G. Papenburg, & H. Schulze (Eds.), Sound as popular culture: a research companion (pp. 355-366). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9975.003.0046

Vancouver

Großmann R. Phonographic work: Reading and writing sound. In Papenburg JG, Schulze H, editors, Sound as popular culture: a research companion. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 2016. p. 355-366 doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9975.003.0046

Bibtex

@inbook{54c900c33b1b4f27b7d0780e2ec34ed5,
title = "Phonographic work: Reading and writing sound",
abstract = "Designing musical artifacts has changed since the use of traditional music notation has been extendend and partly substituted by electronic media based composing, producing and performing. This process is essentially driven by two technocultural innovations of the 20th century: the phonographic notation of sound and the algorithmic notation of programmed sound production. If we consider that the only written and writable medium for working with musical structure has been the score (the medium of a 'tone universe') for many centuries the impact of such a fundamental change (to the medium of a 'sound universe') is evident. The consequences range from new forms and objectives of composition, from everyday practice of media production to the rise of new musical media-instruments like turntables, grooveboxes and laptops. The contribution draws an outline of a theoretical framework that focusses the new strategies and qualities of machine-processable sound notation. The term {"}phonographic work{"} points out the common ground with the established 'contrapunctic work' or 'motivic-thematic work' as an aesthetic paradigm that is based on written material, but emphasizes at the same time the {"}secondary orality{"} (Walter Ong) of phonographic media.",
keywords = "Digital media, Cultural Informatics, Cultural studies",
author = "Rolf Gro{\ss}mann",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
doi = "10.7551/mitpress/9975.003.0046",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780262033909",
pages = "355--366",
editor = "Papenburg, {Jens Gerrit} and Holger Schulze",
booktitle = "Sound as popular culture",
publisher = "The MIT Press",
address = "United States",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Phonographic work

T2 - Reading and writing sound

AU - Großmann, Rolf

PY - 2016/3

Y1 - 2016/3

N2 - Designing musical artifacts has changed since the use of traditional music notation has been extendend and partly substituted by electronic media based composing, producing and performing. This process is essentially driven by two technocultural innovations of the 20th century: the phonographic notation of sound and the algorithmic notation of programmed sound production. If we consider that the only written and writable medium for working with musical structure has been the score (the medium of a 'tone universe') for many centuries the impact of such a fundamental change (to the medium of a 'sound universe') is evident. The consequences range from new forms and objectives of composition, from everyday practice of media production to the rise of new musical media-instruments like turntables, grooveboxes and laptops. The contribution draws an outline of a theoretical framework that focusses the new strategies and qualities of machine-processable sound notation. The term "phonographic work" points out the common ground with the established 'contrapunctic work' or 'motivic-thematic work' as an aesthetic paradigm that is based on written material, but emphasizes at the same time the "secondary orality" (Walter Ong) of phonographic media.

AB - Designing musical artifacts has changed since the use of traditional music notation has been extendend and partly substituted by electronic media based composing, producing and performing. This process is essentially driven by two technocultural innovations of the 20th century: the phonographic notation of sound and the algorithmic notation of programmed sound production. If we consider that the only written and writable medium for working with musical structure has been the score (the medium of a 'tone universe') for many centuries the impact of such a fundamental change (to the medium of a 'sound universe') is evident. The consequences range from new forms and objectives of composition, from everyday practice of media production to the rise of new musical media-instruments like turntables, grooveboxes and laptops. The contribution draws an outline of a theoretical framework that focusses the new strategies and qualities of machine-processable sound notation. The term "phonographic work" points out the common ground with the established 'contrapunctic work' or 'motivic-thematic work' as an aesthetic paradigm that is based on written material, but emphasizes at the same time the "secondary orality" (Walter Ong) of phonographic media.

KW - Digital media

KW - Cultural Informatics

KW - Cultural studies

U2 - 10.7551/mitpress/9975.003.0046

DO - 10.7551/mitpress/9975.003.0046

M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies

SN - 9780262033909

SP - 355

EP - 366

BT - Sound as popular culture

A2 - Papenburg, Jens Gerrit

A2 - Schulze, Holger

PB - The MIT Press

CY - Cambridge

ER -