Phonographic work: Reading and writing sound
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research › peer-review
Standard
Sound as popular culture: a research companion. ed. / Jens Gerrit Papenburg; Holger Schulze. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2016. p. 355-366.
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Phonographic work
T2 - Reading and writing sound
AU - Großmann, Rolf
PY - 2016/3
Y1 - 2016/3
N2 - Designing musical artifacts has changed since the use of traditional music notation has been extendend and partly substituted by electronic media based composing, producing and performing. This process is essentially driven by two technocultural innovations of the 20th century: the phonographic notation of sound and the algorithmic notation of programmed sound production. If we consider that the only written and writable medium for working with musical structure has been the score (the medium of a 'tone universe') for many centuries the impact of such a fundamental change (to the medium of a 'sound universe') is evident. The consequences range from new forms and objectives of composition, from everyday practice of media production to the rise of new musical media-instruments like turntables, grooveboxes and laptops. The contribution draws an outline of a theoretical framework that focusses the new strategies and qualities of machine-processable sound notation. The term "phonographic work" points out the common ground with the established 'contrapunctic work' or 'motivic-thematic work' as an aesthetic paradigm that is based on written material, but emphasizes at the same time the "secondary orality" (Walter Ong) of phonographic media.
AB - Designing musical artifacts has changed since the use of traditional music notation has been extendend and partly substituted by electronic media based composing, producing and performing. This process is essentially driven by two technocultural innovations of the 20th century: the phonographic notation of sound and the algorithmic notation of programmed sound production. If we consider that the only written and writable medium for working with musical structure has been the score (the medium of a 'tone universe') for many centuries the impact of such a fundamental change (to the medium of a 'sound universe') is evident. The consequences range from new forms and objectives of composition, from everyday practice of media production to the rise of new musical media-instruments like turntables, grooveboxes and laptops. The contribution draws an outline of a theoretical framework that focusses the new strategies and qualities of machine-processable sound notation. The term "phonographic work" points out the common ground with the established 'contrapunctic work' or 'motivic-thematic work' as an aesthetic paradigm that is based on written material, but emphasizes at the same time the "secondary orality" (Walter Ong) of phonographic media.
KW - Digital media
KW - Cultural Informatics
KW - Cultural studies
U2 - 10.7551/mitpress/9975.003.0046
DO - 10.7551/mitpress/9975.003.0046
M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies
SN - 9780262033909
SP - 355
EP - 366
BT - Sound as popular culture
A2 - Papenburg, Jens Gerrit
A2 - Schulze, Holger
PB - The MIT Press
CY - Cambridge
ER -